The effect of overload on corrosion fatigue crack growth behavior of a low alloy steel in threshold region
- 16 Downloads
Influence of tensile overload (stress) on corrosion fatigue crack growth behavior of a low alloy steel in threshold region in 3.5% NaCl solution has been investigated. The investigation also examined the influence of material strength on overload retardation behavior. Compact tension specimens with transverse longitudinal (TL) orientation prepared from SAE 4130 steel in two different heat treated conditions were used. All test specimens used in the present investigation satisfied the test requirements of ASTM Standard E-647.
The results of the present investigation demonstrate that in the threshold region, as percentage overload increases more retardation on crack growth rate is produced. This retardation effect on crack growth rate for similar percentage of overload was found to be greater in the annealed condition compared to the hardened and tempered condition. The retardation factor (ϕ) showed a general trend to decrease with increase in ΔK level. This retardation of corrosion fatigue crack growth rate due to tensile overload can be attributed to the effect of crack closure in the crack tip region.
KeywordsCrack Growth Rate Fatigue Crack Growth Crack Closure Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Corrosion Fatigue
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.O.E. Wheeler:Journal of Basic Engineering, Paper No. 71-MELX, 1979.Google Scholar
- 2.G.R. Chinani:Metals Engineering Quarterly, 15, (1975) 40–62.Google Scholar
- 3.A.U. De Koning: ASTM STP 743 (1981), pp. 63–85.Google Scholar
- 4.J. Willenborg, R.M. Engle, and H.A. Wood: Technical Paper AFFLDL-TM 71-lFBRd (1971).Google Scholar
- 5.G.R. Chinani: ASTM STP 642 (1978), pp. 51–73.Google Scholar
- 6.R. Colwell, A. Spis, and S.K. Putatunda:Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. A110, (1989), pp. L13-L17.Google Scholar
- 7.A. Sengupta, A. Spis, and S.K. Putatunda: Presented at 15th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, ISTFA-A ASM, Los Angeles, California, Nov. 6–8, 1989.Google Scholar
- 8.W. Elber:Journal of Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 2, No. 5, 1970, pp. 323–370.Google Scholar
- 9.Kenjiro Komai:Current Research on Fatigue Cracks, Society of Materials Science, Japan, 1987, pp. 267–288.Google Scholar
- 11.R.H. Christensen:Metal Fatigue, McGraw Hill, New York, 1959.Google Scholar
- 13.W. Elber:Journal of Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 2, No. 5, 1970, pp. 323–370.Google Scholar
- 14.R.J. Bucci, A.B. Thakkar, T.H. Sanders, R.R. Sawtell, and J.T. Staley: ASTM 87 7, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1980, pp. 41–78.Google Scholar
- 15.N.A. Fleck: ASTM, Special Technical Publication 924, 1988, p. 157.Google Scholar
- 17.R.O. Ritchie and S. Suresh:International Metals Review, Vol. 1, 1985, pp. 139–162.Google Scholar