Do economists have anything to contribute to the debate on urban sprawl? (and would anbody listen to them if they did?)
- 47 Downloads
This essay explores reasons for the relative shortage of work by economists on the subject of urban sprawl. I argue that a correct economic understanding of the sprawl issue is difficult to communicate. Meanwhile, a simplified caricature of economic thinking on sprawl has emerged. It argues that decentralized, low-density development has been chosen by the “free market”, therefore the problem signified by the word sprawl does not exist. This argument, made in the name of economics but not always by economists, has served to polarize the detabe as much as to enlighten it. I propose an alternative understanding of the economics of sprawl that provides common ground for debate among economists, planners, and politicians.
KeywordsDesign Pattern Market Failure Social Economic Urban Sprawl Urban Economic
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Atkinson, Glen and Ted Oleson. (1996). “Urban Sprawl as a Path Dependent Process.”Journal of Economic Issues, 30, 2: 609–615.Google Scholar
- Bogart William Thomas. (1998).The Economics of Cities and Suburbs. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Burchell, Robert, et. al. (1992).Impact Assessment of the New Jersey Interim State Development and Redevelopment Plan. Prepared for the New Jersey Office of State Planning by the Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research.Google Scholar
- Burchell, Robert. (1997). “Economic and Fiscal Costs (And Benefits) of Sprawl.”Urban Lawyer, 29, 2: 159–181.Google Scholar
- Glaeser, Edward. (Spring 1996). “Why Economists Still Like Cities.”City Journal, 6, 2: 70–77.Google Scholar
- Gordon, Peter, and Harry Richardson. (1991). “Anti-Planning?” Paper prepared for the ACSP-AESOP Joint International Congress onPlanning Transatlantic: Global change and Local Problems, Oxford, U.K., July 8–12, 1991.Google Scholar
- Gore, Albert. (September 1998). “Building Liveable Communities,” Remarks delivered to the Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
- Hollis, Linda, Douglas Porter, and Holly Stallworth. (April 1997).Assessing the Impacts of Development Choices. Prepared for the Governer's Commission for a Sustainable South Florida by the Growth Management Institute.Google Scholar
- Myers, Dowell. (1999).The Debate Over Future Density of Development: An Interpretive Review. Working Paper WP99DM1, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
- Richmond, Henry. (October 1996). “Model Strategies for Greater Cleveland.” Remarks at a Bicentennial Symposium sponsored by the Levin College of Public Affairs, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio.Google Scholar
- Tregoning, Harriett. (March 5, 1999). Speeches given in Cleveland and Akron, Ohio. (Tregoning directs the Smartgrowth Network for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.)Google Scholar