Journal of Materials Engineering

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 113–132 | Cite as

Microstructure and stress corrosion resistance of alloys X750, 718, and A286 in light water reactor environments

  • M. T. Miglin
  • H. A. Domian


The results of microstructural characterization and stress corrosion cracking tests are presented for several heat treatment conditions of the age-hardenable Alloys X750, 718, and A286. Resistance to intergranular stress corrosion cracking (IGSCC) was evaluated using slow strain rate tests in pressurized water reactor (PWR) primary water, microstructural etch, and rising-load screening tests. The results of these tests indicate greater IGSCC resistance in the PWR primary water environment for X750 microstructures with heavier grain boundary coverage by Cr23C6, regardless of grain boundary chromium depletion. Alloys 718 and A 286 were not highly SCC susceptible according to these screening tests, although they are not immune to IGSCC in reactor environments. Results are compared with those of a related program, including crack initiation and crack growth tests in pressurized and boiling water reactor (BWR) environments.


Slow Strain Rate Pressurize Water Reactor Slow Strain Rate Test Boiling Water Reactor Domian 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Metals Handbook, T. Lyman, et al., eds., 8th ed., Vol. 8, American Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1973, p. 39.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G.S. Was, H.H. Tischner, and J.R. Martin,J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1983, pp. 1477–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E.L. Raymond:Trans. Met. Soc. AIME, Vol. 239, No. 9, 1967, pp. 1415–1422.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Hosoi, S. Hattori, Y. Urayama, I. Masaoka, and R. Sasaki,Proc. of the Int’I. Symp. on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems— Water Reactors, Nat’l. Assn. of Corrosion Engineers, Houston, 1984, pp. 334–344.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    F.J. Rizzo and J.D. Buzzanell,J. of Metals, October 1969, pp. 24–33.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L.E. Davis, N.C. MacDonald, P.W. Palmberg, G.E. Riach, and R.E. Weber,Handbook of Auger Electron Spectroscopy, 2nd ed., Physical Electronics Industries, Inc., Eden Prarie, Minn., 1976, p. 13.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W.J. Mills,Met. Trans. A, Vol. 11 A, 1980, pp. 1039–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Floreen and J.L. Nelson,Met. Trans. A, Vol. 14A, 1983, pp. 133–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    I.L.W. Wilson and T.R. Mager,Corrosion, Vol. 42, No. 6, 1986, pp. 352–361.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D.L. Baty, G.O. Hayner, G.S. Clevinger, and G.L. Garner,Proc. of Intl. Symp. on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems—Water Reactors, Nat’l. Assn. of Corrosion Engineers, Houston, 1984, pp. 151–178.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Hattori, Y. Mori, I. Masaoka, R. Sasaki, R. Watanabe, and H. Itoh,Proc. of ANS Winter Annual Meeting, San Francisco, Calif., Nov. 29-Dec. 4, 1981, pp. 451–453.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G.P. Airey, “Optimization of Metallurgical Variables to Improve the Stress Corrosion Resistance of Inconel 600,”Research Report NP-135, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Calif., March 1980.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Van Rooyen,Corrosion, Vol. 31, No. 9, 1975, p. 327.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H.A. Domian, R.H. Emanuelson, L.W. Sarver, and G.J. Theus,Corrosion, Vol. 33, 1977, p. 26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. T. Miglin
    • 1
  • H. A. Domian
    • 1
  1. 1.Research & Development DivisionBabcock & Wilcox, a McDermott companyAlliance

Personalised recommendations