The compatibility of metal electrodes in the oil fired MHD environment
- 13 Downloads
An important item in the development of the MHD generator is the development of a durable electrode. This paper investigates the compatibility of metal electrodes to the oil fired MHD environment by examining the degradation mechanisms of type 304 steel and SHOMAC® steel anodes and W-Cu and WC-Ag cathodes. For purpose of clarification, we wish to state that the cathode is the electrode that is bombarded by positive ions from the MHD plasma; the anode is bombarded by negative ions. It is shown that type 304 steel anode loss is due to both corrosion by current and abrasion by combustion gas flow, and can be predicted by using empirical equations, if only the surface temperature is given. Abrasion appears if the surface temperature is over about 700 K. General corrosion also occurs on both type 304 steel and SHOMAC steel anodes and is accompanied by the formation of solid oxide scales. On the other hand, W-Cu cathode loss is mostly by abrasion in the current region below about 0.3 A/cm2. However, above that current value, corrosion by current increases rapidly due to the generation of intensive arc spots.
KeywordsCorrosion Rate Cathode Material Weight Loss Rate Abrasion Loss Steel Anode
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Open-Cycle MHD Power Generation, J. B. Heywood and G. J. Womack, eds., Pergamon Press, London, 1969, pp. 506–532.Google Scholar
- 2.V. J. Hruby, J. Morenski, S. W. Petty, and A. Solbes:Electrode Development at AVCO Everett Research Laboratory, Inc., 7th International Conference on MHD Electrical Power Generation, M.I.T., Cambridge, MA, June 1980, vol. 1, p. 262.Google Scholar
- 3.V. J. Hruby, R. Kessler, S. W. Petty, and P. Weiss:1000 Hour MHD Anode Test, 20th Symposium on Engineering Aspects of MHD, Irvine, CA, 1982, p. 4.3.1.Google Scholar
- 4.Y. Kusaka, K. Takano, K. Onda, K. Kato, Y. Kaga, Y. Aiyama, M. Irino, T. Imatake, and Y. Fukaya:Experimental Investigation of ETL Mark VII MHD Facility, 21st Symposium on Engineering Aspects of MHD, Argonne, IL, 1983, p. 2.8.1.Google Scholar
- 7.Y. Kusaka, S. Ikeda, T. Honda, and Y. Aiyama:Construction of ETL Mark VII MHD Facility, 7th International Conference on MHD Electric Power Generation, M.I.T., Cambridge, MA, June 1980, vol. 1, p. B.4.1.Google Scholar
- 8.K. Fushimi, T. Homma, Y. Aiyama. Y. Akiyama. S. Ikeda, O. Nomura, T. Kashihara, T. Masuda, K. Takano, Y. Kusaka, Y. Kaga, and N. Amano:Construction of an MHD Generator with a Large-Scale Superconducting Magnet (ETL Mark V), 13th Symposium on Engineering Aspects of MHD. Stanford University. March 1973, p. IV.2.1.Google Scholar
- 9.Open-Cycle MHD Power Generation, J. B. Heywood and G. J. Womack, eds., Pergamon Press, London, 1969, p. 519.Google Scholar
- 10.For example. J. D. Aspnes and D. A. Pierre:Dynamic Modeling and Control of Magnetohydrodynamic / Steam Power Generation Plants, 16th Symposium on Engineering Aspects of MHD, The University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. May 16–18, 1977, p. X.I.I.Google Scholar
- 11.Handbook of Metals (Journal of the Japan Institute of Metals), Maruzen, 1982, p. 1255.Google Scholar
- 13.M. Martinez-Sanchez and C. E. Kolb:A Model for the Enhancement of Corrosion by Sulfur at MHD Anodes, 19th Symposium on Engineering Aspects of MHD, The University of Tennessee Space Institute, Tullahoma, TN, June 15–17, 1981, p. 8.2.1.Google Scholar