Journal of Heat Treating

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 5–19 | Cite as

Preoxidation prior to gas carburizing: Theory and its effect on pyrowear ® 53 alloy

  • Michael L. Schmidt


The absorption of carbon during gas carburizing of steel components is reviewed based on thermodynamic and kinetic considerations. The effects of chromium and silicon on carbon absorption are reviewed based on the thermodynamics of passive film formation in the presence of a carburizing gas. Finally, the merits associated with the use of preoxidation treatments prior to gas carburizing are discussed and the results of an in-depth analysis performed on carbon absorption in Pyrowear®1 53 alloy are presented based on preoxidation temperature.

Maximum carbon absorption was observed when using a preoxidation temperature of approximately 700/927° C (1292/1700° F) prior to carburizing Pyrowear 53 alloy at 927° C (1700° F) for 7.5 hr at a carbon potential of 1.16-1.19 using a 40% N2, 40% H2, and 20% CO endothermic carrier gas and vaporized methanol. This effect is believed to be related to the thickness of the oxide layer and to the roughness of the oxide/metal interface.


Austenite Carbon Absorption Carbon Potential Surface Oxide Layer Furnace Atmosphere 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    G. Krauss: “Principles of Heat Treatment of Steel,” p. 252, Am. Soc. Met., Metals Park, Ohio, 1980.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P.R. Patel: Bell Helicopter Corp., Forth Worth, Texas, unpublished research October 31, 1986.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Metals Handbook, 9th ed., Vol. 4, pp. 135–175, Am. Soc. Met., Metals Park, Ohio, 1981.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.L. Davis,Met. Prog., 1969, vol. 96, pp. 99–102.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carburizing and Carbonitriding, ASM Committee on Gas Carburizing, Am. Soc. Met., Metals Park, Ohio, 1977.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Collin, S. Gunnarson, and D. Thulin,J. Iron Steel Inst., 1972, vol. 210, pp. 785–789.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Ellis,J. Iron Steel Inst., 1963, vol. 201, pp. 582–587.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Neumann and B. Person,Härt.-Techn. Mitt., 1968, vol. 203, p. 296.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    F.J. Harvey,Met. Trans., 1978, vol. 9A, pp. 1507–1513.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Collin, “Heat Treatment ’73,” proceedings of a conference, London, Dec. 1973, pp. 121–124, Met. Soc, London (1975).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Collin, M. Brachaczek, and D. Thulin,J. Iron Steel Inst., 1969, vol. 207, pp. 1122–1128.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Colin, S. Gunnarson, and D. Thulin,J. Iron Steel Inst., 1972, vol. 210, pp. 777–784.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R.A. Perkins, “Behavior of High Temperature Alloys in Aggressive Environments,” proceedings of the international conference Oct. 1979, pp. 617–645, Met. Soc, London (1980).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    N.M. Levtonova, K.I. Cheskis, and A.F. Mikhailova,Met. Sci. Heat. Treat., 1976, vol. 18, pp. 433–434.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R.J. Cunningham, and W. Lieberman, U.S. Patent 3,885,995, May 27, 1975.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    P.R. Patel, Inter-Office Memorandum, 81:PRP:mw-1175, Bell Helicopter Textron, June 24, 1986.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.I. Goldstein, D.E. Newbury, P. Echlin, D.C. Joy, C. Fiori, and E. Lifshin, “Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis,” pp. 306–308, Plenum Press, New York, 1984.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    The Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel, 9th ed., pp. 297–298, United States Steel Corp., Pittsburgh, 1971.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael L. Schmidt
    • 1
  1. 1.Tool and Alloy R&D with Carpenter Technology Corp.Reading

Personalised recommendations