Abstract
The microbial community structures of anaerobic sludge, alternately exposed to mesophilic and thermophilic condition, were investigated and their microbial activities under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. PCR-DGGE (polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis) profiles for the eubacterial and archaebacterial communities from thermophilic sludge alternately exposed to mesophilic condition (TSEM) and mesophilic sludge alternately exposed to thermophilic condition (MSET) had a few populations in common, these are probably thermophilic microorganisms. The population profiles for archaebacterial communities of TSEM and MSET were quite different from each other. For TSEM under thermophilic condition, the specific methanogenic activity (SMA) was 159.6mL CH4/g VSS/d, which was higher than 106.3mL CH4/g VSS/d under mesophilic condition. The SMA for MSET under both temperature conditions was as much as those of TSEM. The lag phase period for MSET in the batch culture was around 2 times longer than TSEM, but the lag periods for both sludges under thermophilic condition were shorter than those under mesophilic condition. The acidogenic activity for both sludge types in MSET was slightly higher than TSEM under the thermophilic and mesophilic conditions. The specific hydrolytic activity for the two sludge types was higher under the mesophilic condition, and the hydrolysis potential of TSEM incubated under mesophilic condition was higher than other cases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adrie, V. and Bert, H. (1999). “Effect of temperature on hydrolysis rates of selected biowaste components.”Bio. Tech., Vol. 69, No. 3, pp. 249–254.
Aoki, N. and Kawase, M. (1991). “Development of high performance thermophilic two-phase digestion process.”Wat. Sci. Tech., Vol. 23, pp. 1147–1156.
Daniel, I. M. and Lucie, M. (2001). “The effect of temperature on slaughterhouse wastewater treatment in anaerobic sequencing batch reactors.”Bio. Tech., Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 91–98.
Han, Y., Sung, S., and Dague, R. R. (1997). “Temperature-phased anaerobic digestion of wastewater sludge.”Wat. Sci. Tech., Vol. 36, No. 6-7, pp. 367–374.
Lay, J.J., Li, Y.Y., and Noike, T. (1997). “Influences of pH and moisture content on the methane production in high-solids sludge digestion.”Wat. Res., Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 1518–1524.
Song, Y.C. (1995).High-rate Methane Fermentation of the Organic Solid Waste. Ph. D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, KAIST.
Song, Y.C., Kwon, S.J., and Woo, J.H. (2003). “Mesophilic and thermophilic temperature co-phase anaerobic digestion compared with single-stage mesophilic- and thermophilic digestion of sewage sludge.”Wat. Res., Vol. 38, pp. 1653–1662.
Song, Y.C., Woo, J.H., Kwon, S.J., Park, I.S., and Yoo, J.S. (2003). Influence of Temperature on the Biochemical Activity of the sludges from the Thermophilic-Mesophilic Cophase Anaerobic Digestion System, Korean Society of Env. Eng., Oct.
Van Lier, J. B. (1996). “Limitation of thermophilic anaerobic wastewater treatment and the consequences for process design.”Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, Vol. 69, pp. 1–14.
Vandenburgh, S.R. and Ellis, T.G. (2002). “Effect of varying solids concentration and organic loading on the performance oftemperature phased anaerobic digestion process.”Water Environ. Res., Vol. 74, No. 2, pp. 142–148.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Song, Y.C., Woo, J.H., Kwon, S.J. et al. Microbial activity and population structure of anaerobic sludge alternately exposed to mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. KSCE J Civ Eng 10, 319–323 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02830085
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02830085