Advertisement

Forum for Social Economics

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 22–29 | Cite as

Can rawls' vision of justice provide a preferential option for the poor of the third world?

  • John D. Abell
Article

Keywords

Human Dignity Difference Principle Preferential Option Social Infrastructure Catholic Social Teaching 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Crotty, James R. and Rev. James R. Stormes, “The Bishops on the U.S. Economy,” inTaking Sides 3rd ed., 1986, Guilford, Connecticut: Dushkin Publishing Group, pp. 326–333.Google Scholar
  2. George, Susan,A Fate Worse than Debt 1990, New York: Grove Weidenfeld.Google Scholar
  3. Rawls, JohnA Theory of Justice, 1971, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. U. S. Catholic Bishops, “Economic Justice For All: Catholic Social Teaching and the U.S. Economy,”Origins, National Catholic documentary service, November 27, 1986, Vol. 16, No. 24.Google Scholar
  5. Worland, Stephen, “Preferential Option for the Poor and the Marxian-Christian Perspective on Distributive Justice,”Forum for Social Economics, Fall 1988, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • John D. Abell

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations