Skip to main content
Log in

Lime pretreatment of crop residues bagasse and wheat straw

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lime (calcium hydroxide) was used as a pretreatment agent to enhance the enzymatic digestibility of two common crop residues: bagasse and wheat straw. A systematic study of pretreatment conditions suggested that for short pretreatment times (1–3 h), high temperatures (85-135°C) were required to achieve high sugar yields, whereas for long pretreatment times (e.g., 24 h), low temperatures (50–65°C) were effective. The recommended lime loading is 0.1 g Ca(OH)2/g dry biomass. Water loading had little effect on the digestibility. Under the recommended conditions, the 3-d reducing sugar yield of the pretreated bagasse increased from 153 to 659 mg Eq glucose/g dry biomass, and that of the pretreated wheat straw increased from 65 to 650 mg Eq glucose/g dry biomass. A material balance study on bagasse showed that the biomass yield after lime pretreatment is 93.6%. No glucan or xylan was removed from bagasse by the pretreatment, whereas 14% of lignin became solubilized. A lime recovery study showed that 86% of added calcium was removed from the pretreated bagasse by ten washings and could be recovered by carbonating the wash water with CO2 at pH 9.5.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ernest, R. K. and Buffington, L. E. (1981), inCRC Handbook of Biomass Resources, vol. II. Zaborsky O. R., ed., CRC., Boca Raton, FL, pp. 501–509.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Day, D. L. (1989), inBiomass Handbook, Kitani, O. and Hall, C. W., eds. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, pp. 142–146.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fan, L. T., Lee, Y.-H., and Gharpuray, M. M. (1982),Adv. Biochem. Eng. 23, 157–187.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kong, R., Engler, C. R. and Soltes, E. J. (1992),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 34, 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Han, Y. W., Catalano, E. A., and Ciegler, A. (1983), inWood and Agricultural Residues: Research on Use for Feed, Fuels, and Chemicals, Soltes, J., ed. Academic, New York, pp. 217–238.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fontana, J. D., Ramos, L. P., and Deschamps, F. C. (1995),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 51/52, 105–116.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Deschamps, F. C., Ramos, L. P., and Fontana, J. D. (1996),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 57/58, 171–182.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. van Walsum, G. P., Allen, S. G., Spencer, M. J., Laser, M. S., Antal, M. J., and Lynd, L. R. (1996),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 57/58, 157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibrahim, M. N. M. and Pearce, G. R. (1983),Agricultural Wastes 5, 135–156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Playne, M. J. (1984),Biotechnol. Bioeng. 26, 426–433.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ladisch, M. R., Ladisch, C. M., and Tsao, G. T. (1978),Science 201, 743–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Holtzapple, M. T., Jun, J.-H., Ashok, G., Patibandla, S. L., and Dale, B. E. (1991),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 28/29, 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gharpuray, M. M., Lee, Y.-H., and Fan, L. T. (1983),Biotechnol. Bioeng. 25, 157–172.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fan, L. T., Gharpuray, M. M., and Lee, Y.-H. (1981),Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 11, 29–45.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Beltrame, P. L., Carniti, P., and Visciglio, A. (1992),Bioresource Technol. 39, 165–171.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilson, R. K. and Pigden, W. J. (1964),Can. J. Anim. Sci. 44, 122–123.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Verma, M. L. (1983), inThe Utilisation of Fibrous Agricultural Residues, Pearce, G. R., ed. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, A.C.T., pp. 85–99.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Djajanegara, A., Molina, B. T., and Doyle, P. T. (1984),Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 12, 141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lesoing, G., Klopfenstein, T., Rush, I., and Ward, J. (1981),J. Anim. Sci. 51, no. 2, 263–269.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Detroy, R. W., Lindenfelser, L. A., St. Julian, G., Jr., and Orton, W. L. (1980),Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 10, 135–148.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Grohmann, K., Torget, R., and Himmel, M. (1985),Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 15, 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Holtzapple, M. T. (1981), inThe Pretreatment and Enzymatic Saccharification of Poplar Wood, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chemical Marketing Reporter251(3), January 20, 1997, Schnell Publishing, New York, pp. 22–30.

  24. Chang, V. S., Burr, B., and Holtzapple, M. T. (1997), Lime pretreatment of switchgrass.Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol,63–65, 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chemical Analysis & Testing Standard Procedure, no. 002–006, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.

  26. Miller, G. L. (1959),Anal. Chem. 31, 462–428.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chang, V. S., Holtzapple, M. T., and Davidson, R. (1996), inDevelopment of Alternative Pretreatment and Biomass Fractionation Processes: Lime Pretreatment, part III, Final Report, Subcontract XAW-3-11181-03, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, pp. 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark T. Holtzapple.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, V.S., Nagwani, M. & Holtzapple, M.T. Lime pretreatment of crop residues bagasse and wheat straw. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 74, 135–159 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02825962

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02825962

Index Entries

Navigation