Knowledge, Technology and Policy

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 28–35 | Cite as

Knowledge management in agriculture: Building upon diversity

  • Paul G. H. Engel
Feature Articles


Knowledge increasingly has become a vital resource. Within our communities, institutions, and organizations, practical insights are needed for optimizing its use. Knowledge management needs to become an object of study. This article deals with two issues. First, using both knowledge systems concepts and tools, and insights gained from comparative research, it explores the vital qualities of agricultural knowledge systems. These qualities, like the multiplicity and relative autonomy of the actors, the level of integration reached through linkage mechanisms, and the coordination needed to overcome default situations, might provide leverage points for effective knowledge management. Second, it probes into a more specific definition of the tasks and areas of attention of the knowledge manager. Knowledge management can focus on various levels of a system (e.g., the individual, organizational, or system level) and can make use of a variety of instruments and skills.


Knowledge Management Knowledge System Linkage Mechanism Knowledge Network Informal Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bolhuis, E.E., & Van der Ploeg, J. (1985).Boerenarbeid en stijlen van landbouwbeoefening. Leiden: University of Leiden Development Studies.Google Scholar
  2. Box, L. (1989). Knowledge, networks, and cultivators: Cassava in the Dominican Republic. In N. Long (Ed.),Encounters at the interface, a perspective on social discontinuities in rural development. Wageningen: Agricultural University.Google Scholar
  3. Carter, A.P. (1989). Know-how trading as economic exchange.Research Policy, 18, 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Engel, P.G.H. (1989). Kennis- en informatiegebruik door bedrijfsvoorlicht(st)ers: Uitgangspunt voor kennismanagement,Agrarische Voorlichting, 1(6/7), 27–30.Google Scholar
  5. Engel, P.G.H. (1990).The impact of improved institutional coordination on agricultural performance: The case of the Nariño Highlands in Colombia (Linkage Discussion Paper No. 4). The Hague: ISNAR.Google Scholar
  6. Engel, P.G.H. (1990).Agricultural knowledge management: Concepts and tools. A comparative study. Wageningen: Agricultural University, Department of Extension Science. (in preparation).Google Scholar
  7. Grooters, W. (1990).The role of growers and pig farmers in the programming of adaptive agricultural research in The Netherlands. Unpublished master's thesis. Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  8. Kaimowitz, D., Snyder, M., & Engel, P.G.H. (1989).A conceptual framework for studying links between agricultural research and technology transfer in developing countries. The Hague: ISNAR.Google Scholar
  9. McDermott, J.K. (1987). Making extension effective: The role of extension/research linkages. In W. Rivera, S. Schram (Eds.),Agricultural Extension World-wide. New York: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  10. Moss Kanter, R. (1983).The change masters: Innovation and entrepreneurship in the American corporation. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  11. Nitsch, U. (1990). Appropriate use of computers. In M. Florin, & B. Göranzon (Eds.),Artificial intelligence, culture and language. West Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Rogers, E.M., & Kincaid, D.L. (1981)Communication networks: Towards a new paradigm for research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Röling, N.G. (1988)Extension science, information systems in agricultural development. New York: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Röling, N.G. (1989).The agricultural research-technology transfer interface: A knowledge systems perspective (Linkage Theme Paper No. 6). The Hague: ISNAR.Google Scholar
  15. Röling, N.G., & Engel, P.G.H. (1990). Information technology from a knowledge system perspective: Concepts and issues.Knowledge in Society: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer (this issue).Google Scholar
  16. Schiefer, G. (1990). Farm-related communication: European videotex experiences in agriculture.Knowledge in Society: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer (this issue).Google Scholar
  17. Sims, H., & Leonard, D. (1989).The political economy of the development and transfer of agricultural technologies (Linkage Theme Paper No. 4). The Hague: ISNAR.Google Scholar
  18. Van den Ban, A.W. (1987). Communication systems between agricultural research and the farmers: The Netherlands way.Journal of Extension Systems, 3.Google Scholar
  19. Verkaik, A.P., & Dijkveld Stol, N.A. (1989).Commercialisering van kennis en het functioneren van het landbouwkennissysteem, The Hague: NRLO.Google Scholar
  20. Von Hippel, E. (1987). Cooperation between rivals: Informal know-how trading,Research Policy, 16, 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wissema, J.G., & Euser, L. (1988).Samenwerking bij technologische vernieuwing. Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul G. H. Engel

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations