Optimized conditions for rapd analysis inPinus radiata
- 50 Downloads
Pinus radiata is the most important softwood plantation species in Australia and New Zealand. The improtance of this species in forestry has led to an increasing demand to improve the efficiency of selection time of the production population, which currently takes 13 yr by traditional methods. With the application of molecular biology techniques such as random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) the selection period can be reduced to 6 yr. In this study, the conditions for RAPD were optimized and the feasibility of this marker system was investigated with different families ofPinus radiata from Tasmania and South Australia. Best concentrations of Taq-polymerase (1 U), magnesium chloride (2 mM), and template DNA (20 ng) were selected to test different polymerase chain reaction (PCR) thermocycler profiles. Devey's et al. (1996) program was the most effective for production of clear RAPD bands. Best conditions were investigated to screen 10–12 bp arbitrary Breasatec and Operon primers. Both types were found useful at detecting genetic variation between families. Seventy percent and thirty percent of the selected Bresatec and Operon primers, respectively, produced polymorphic bands.
Key wordsPolymorphisms RAPD Pinus radiata genetic diversity PCR primers
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.Erlich, H. A.; Kazarian, H. H., Jr.; Gibbs, R. A., Introduction—Polymerase chain reaction. Erlich, H. A.; Gibbs, R.; Kazarian, H. H., Jr., eds. Current communications in molecular biology. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989:1–4.Google Scholar
- 6.Keller, G. H.; Manak, M. M. DNA probes, background, application, procedures. 2nd ed. Macmillan Publishers; 1993:1–288.Google Scholar
- 7.Landry, B. S. DNA mapping in plants. Glick, B. R.; Thompson, J. E., eds.Methods in plant molecular biology and biotechnology. London, England: CRC Press; 1993:269–283.Google Scholar
- 8.Lu, M. Z.; Szmidt, A. E.; Wang, X. R. Inheritance of RAPD fragments in haploid and diploid tissues ofPinus sylvestris (L.).Heredity 74:582–589; 1995.Google Scholar
- 10.Muralitharan, M. S.; Stuart, S.; Graham, M. (1994)Methods in Plant Molecular Biology Techniques. Proceedings of Molecular Biology Workshop. July 14–16, 1994, Launceston, Tasmania. Available from: Applied Biology, University of Tasmania; pp. 1–98), Launceston.Google Scholar
- 12.Nelson, C. D.; Kubisiak, T. L.; Stine, M., et al. A genetic linkage map of longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs.J. Hered. 85:433–439; 1994.Google Scholar
- 14.Plomion, C.; Bahrman, N.; Durel, C. E., et al. Genomic mapping inPinus pinaster (maritime pine) using RAPD and protein markers.Heredity 74:661–668; 1994.Google Scholar
- 16.Sambrook, J.; Fritsch, E. F.; Maniatis, T.Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989:5.3–6.6.Google Scholar
- 18.White, T.L. A conceptual framework for tree improvement programs.New For. 4:325–342; 1987.Google Scholar
- 19.Wilhelmina, T. G.; McNicol, R. The use of RAPD markers for the identification of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) clones.Heredity 75:126–132; 1995.Google Scholar