Evaluation of UICC TNM classification for pancreatic cancer
- 258 Downloads
A different stage grouping of TNM factors can improve the predictivity of the UICC TNM classification for pancreatic cancer. Nevertheless, the Japanese Pancreas Society (JPS) classification maintains a higher prognostic value.
The use of a reliable staging classification facilitates the evaluation of anticancer treatments and the correct management of patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic value of three modified UICC TNM classifications, obtained by different stage grouping of the UICC TNM factors, comparing their predictivity to the standard UICC and the JPS classifications.
Clinical material consisted of 228 patients who underwent resection for pancreatic cancer. The reliability of the classifications was analyzed by the following methods: univariate analysis of stage survival curves; multivariate analysis of each classification after adjusting for grading and radicality; and correlation between the patients' distribution in the stages of each classification and in survival classes.
The following modfiied UICC classification allowed a better differentiation of stage II and III survival (P=0.08) than standard UICC (p=0.74): stage I: T1N0M0; stage II: T1N1M0/T2N0M0: stage III: T2N1M0/T3 any NM0; stage IV: M1. The JPS classification better discriminated between the different stages (P<0.001). All classifications had an independent prognostic value by multivariate analysis. The correlation between stages and survival classes was higher for the JPS classification than either UICC TNM classification or the modified UICC classifications.
Key WordsPancreatic neoplasms neoplasm staging classification survival survival analysis surgery pathology
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Hermanek P, Sobin LH, eds. UICC TNMClassification of Malignant Tumours, 4th ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987.Google Scholar
- 5.Klöppel G, Lingenthal G, von Bülow M, Kern HF. Histological and fine structural features of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas in relation to growth and prognosis: studies in xenografted tumours and clinicopathological correlation in a series of 75 casesHistopathology 1985; 9: 841–856.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Kaplan E, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations.JR Stat Soc 1958; 8: 423–446.Google Scholar
- 12.Hermanek P, Sobin LH, eds.UICC TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 4th ed., 2nd rev. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992.Google Scholar
- 13.AJCC.Manual for Staging of Cancer, 4th ed., Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1992.Google Scholar
- 14.Japan Pancreas Society.General Rules for the Study of Pancreatic Cancer. 4th ed., Kanehara, Tokyo, 1993(in Japanese).Google Scholar
- 15.Japan Pancreas Society,Classification of Pancreatic Carcinoma, 1st English ed., Kanehara, Tokyo, 1996.Google Scholar