Folia Geobotanica & Phytotaxonomica

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 421–422 | Cite as

Nomenclature of vegetation types and the Code: A few concluding remarks

  • Ladislav Mucina
Forum: Names and Nomenelature in Phytosociology


Classification Code of Phytosociogical Nomenclature Syntaxonomy 


  1. Barkman J.J., Moravec J. &Rauschert S. (1986): Code of phytosociological nomenclature. Ed. 2.Vegetatio 67: 145–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Julve P. (1997): Some comments on the present Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature.Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 32: 407–410.Google Scholar
  3. Krahulec F. (1997): The Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature: can the nomenclature be definitive?Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 32: 411–413.Google Scholar
  4. Mucina L. (1997a): Classification of vegetation: Past, present and future.J. Veg. Sci. 8: 751–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mucina L. (1997b): Quo vadis Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature?Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 32: 395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Peters R.H. (1989):A critique for ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Rejmánek M. (1997): Towards simplification of phytosociological nomenclature.Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 32: 419–420.Google Scholar
  8. Sánchez-Mata D. (1997): The phytosociological approach in North American studies: some considerations on phytosociological nomenclature.Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 32: 415–418.Google Scholar
  9. Theurillat J.-P. (1997): The fitness of the code: a three-legged cauldron.Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 32: 401–406.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Botany 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesKuwait UniversitySafatState of Kuwait

Personalised recommendations