Metallurgical Transactions

, Volume 2, Issue 10, pp 2885–2888 | Cite as

The importance of mechanical twinning in the stress-strain behavior of swaged high purity fine-grained titanium below 424°K

  • A. M. Garde
  • R. E. Reed-Hill
Mechanical Behavior


Zone-refined iodide titanium specimens, swaged and annealed at different temperatures to give a range of grain sizes from 2.4 to 22 μ, were deformed to fracture between 77° and 424°K. A metallographic study of the fractured specimens revealed that mechanical twinning is an important factor in the plastic deformation of this grade of titanium at subambient temperatures. In all cases, the volume fraction of twins increased steadily with strain as well as with decreasing deformation temperature. At 77°K and at a grain size of 22 μ, the twin volume fraction was greater than 0.5 at a strain of 0.5. Furthermore, each of the 77°K stress-strain curves showed a linear work-hardening character with an associated high ductility similar to that originally reported by Wasilewski for commercial purity titanium. The nearly linear stress-strain curve in this latter case has been rationalized earlier in terms of deformation twinning. The present results are in good agreement with this point of view.


Deformation Twinning Mechanical Twinning Commercial Purity Titanium Twin Volume Fraction Subambient Temperature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. N. Orava, G. Stone, and H. Conrad:Trans. ASM, 1966, vol. 59, pp. 171–84.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. L. Jones and H. Conrad:Acta Met., 1967, vol. 15, pp. 649–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. L. Jones and H. Conrad:Scripta Met., 1968, vol. 2, pp. 239–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Conrad and R. Jones:The Science, Technology and Application of Titanium, R. Jaffee and N. Promisel, eds., pp. 489–501. Pergamon Press, New York, 1970.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. D. Rosi and F. C. Perkins:J. Metals, 1953, vol. 5, pp. 1083–84.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. B. Kula and T. S. DeSisto:Am. Soc. Testing Mater., Spec. Tech. Publ., 1966, p. 387.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. I. Burrier, Jr., M. F. Amateau, and E. A. Steigerwald: Air Force Materials Laboratory, AFML-TR-65-239, July 1965.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. D. Rosi and F. C. Perkins:Trans. ASM, 1953, vol. 45, pp. 972–92.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Y. Lii, V. Ramachandran, and R. E. Reed-Hill:Met. Trans., 1970, vol. 1, pp. 447–53.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. J. Wasilewski:Trans. ASM, 1963, vol. 56, pp. 221–35.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. T. Santhanam, V. Ramachandran, and R. E. Reed-Hill: Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla., unpublished research, February 1971.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Sargent and H. Conrad:Scripta Met., 1969, vol. 3, pp. 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Metallurgical Society of American Institute of Mining, Mitallurgical and Petroleum Engineers, Inc., and American Society for Metals 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. M. Garde
    • 1
  • R. E. Reed-Hill
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringUniversity of FloridaGainesville

Personalised recommendations