Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)

, Volume 100, Issue 3, pp 413–418 | Cite as

Magnetic moments of nonrelativistic composite quarks and leptons

  • M. Samuel
  • S. Nandi
  • S. Rajpoot
  • T. Rizzo


We consider nonrelativistic composite models for quarks and leptons. We determine the constraints which arise, in order that theg value for both the quarks and the leptons, as well as the preons should be equal to 2. We present models which are consistent with our constraints.

PACS 12.35

Composite models of particles 

Магнитные моменты нерелятивистскнх составных кварков и лептонов


Мы рассматриваем нерелятивистские составные модели для кварков и лептонов. Мы определяем ограничения, которые возникают из условия, чтобы величинаQ для кварков и лептонов, а также для преонов равнялась бы 2. Предлагаются модели, которые удовлетворяют этим ограничениям.


Si considerano modelli composti non relativistici per i quark e i leptoni. Si determinano i vincoli che sorgono, per far si' che il valore dig per i quark e i leptoni nonché per i preonisia uguale a due. Si presentano modelli che sono compatibili con i nostri vincoli.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    J. J. Kokkedee:The Quark Model, (W. A. Benjamin Inc., New York, N. Y., 1969);F. Halzen andA. Martin:Quarks and Leptons (John Wiley, New York, N. Y. 1984);A. De Rujula, H. Georgi andS. Glashow:Phys. Rev. D,12, 147 (1975);M. A. Samuel:Magnetic moments of baryons in a nonrelativistic quark model with unequal quark masses, unpublished (1986).Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    W boson byT. Rizzo andM. Samuel:Magnetic moments of composite Wbosons (unpublished, 1986).Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    G. 't Hooft:Lecture III, Lecture given at the Cargese Summer Institute (1979).Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    J. C. Pati andA. Salam:Phys. Rev. D,10, 275 (1974);Proceedings of the Palermo Conference, June 1975.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    O. W. Greenberg andJ. Sucher:Phys. Lett. B,99, 339 (1981).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    O. W. Greenberg:Phys. Rev. Lett.,35, 1120 (1975).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    J. C. Pati, A. Salam andJ. Strathdee:Phys. Lett. B,59, 265 (1975);J. C. Pati, S. Rajpoot andA. Salam:J. Phys. A,13, 2509 (1980).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    K. Matumoto:Prog. Theor. Phys.,52, 1973 (1974).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    M. Yasue:Phys. Lett. B,91, 85 (1980).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    H. Terazawa:Proceedings of the XXII Conference on High Energy Physics, Leipzig, 1984, edited byA. Meyer andE. Weiezonek.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    L. F. Abbott andE. Farhi:Phys. Letts. B,101, 69 (1981);Nucl. Phys. B,189, 541 (1981).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    M. Claudson, E. Farhi andR. L. Jaffe: MIT Preprint CTP #1331 (1986), to be published.Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    M. Han andY. Nambu:Phys. Rev. B,139, 1006 (1965).MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    R. Mohapatra: private communication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Samuel
    • 1
  • S. Nandi
    • 1
  • S. Rajpoot
    • 1
  • T. Rizzo
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsOklahoma State UniversityStillwater
  2. 2.Ames Laboratory and Department of PhysicsIowa State UniversityAmes

Personalised recommendations