Advertisement

AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 11, Issue 1–2, pp 218–230 | Cite as

Assessing employee responses to teamworking and organisational change

  • Chris Rees
Article
  • 138 Downloads

Abstract

This paper surveys recent case study evidence addressing the implications of task-based teamworking for front-line employees. It refers primarily to three manufacturing companies in Britain. All three companies faced significant external challenges deriving from increased competition, and in each case teamworking was perceived as a key aspect of organisational restructuring. The paper illustrates the complexity of employee responses, arguing that there is no ‘one best way’ to implement teamworking, but at the same time suggesting what some of the necessary conditions might be for teamworking to be ‘successful’.

Keywords

Competitiveness Industrial relations Partnership Productivity Teamworking Work organisation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J. et al. (1994). “Japanese team-based work systems in North America: explaining the diversity”,California Management Review, 37, 42–64Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dale, B.G. and Cooper, C. (1992).Total Quality and Human Resources: An Executive Guide, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Delbridge, R. and Turnbull, P. (1992). Human resource maximisation: the management of labour under just-in-time manufacturing systems, in P. Blyton and P. Turnbull (eds)Reassessing Human Resource Management. London: SageGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Edwards, P.K., Collinson, M. and Rees, C. (1998). “The determinants of employee responses to TQM: six case studies”.Organization Studies. (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elger, T. (1990). “Technical Innovation and work reorganisation in British manufacturing in the 1980s: continuity, intensification or transformation?”Work, Employment and Society, (special issue, May) 4, 67–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elger, T. and Fairbrother, P. (1992). Inflexible flexibility: a case study of modularization, in N. Gilbert, R. Burrows and A. Pollert (eds.)Fordism and Flexibility: Divisions and Change, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garibaldo, F. (1997). “Knowledge, Competition and Employment”, paper presented atWork and Technology Consortium Conference on “Real Change in Organisations”, Bologna, 9–10 June.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Geary, J. (1993). “Work practices: the structure of work, in P.K. Edwards (ed.)Industrial Relations, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    Godfrey, G., Wilkinson, A., Marchington, M. and Dale, B. (1996). “Competitive advantage through people?: human resource policies in forms introducing total quality management”, paper presented atOpen University Business School Conference on “HRM: the Inside Story”, Milton Keynes, 1–2 April.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    Hill, S. and Peccei, R. (1996). “Checking out service: evaluating HRM and TQM in retailing”, paper presented atOpen University Business School Conference on “HRM: the Inside Story”, Milton Keynes, 1–2 April.Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    Marchington, M., Wilkinson, A., Ackers, P. and Goodman, J. (1994). “Understanding the meaning of participation”,Human Relations, 47, 867–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 13.
    McArdle, L., Rowlinson, M., Proctor, S., Hassard, J. and Forrester, P. (1995). Total quality management and participation: employee empowerment or the enhancement of exploitation?, in A. Wilkinson and H. Willmott (eds)Making Quality Critical: New Perspectives on Organisational Change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    O’Connell Davidson, J. (1990). “The road to functional flexibility: white collar work and employment relations in a privatised public utility”,The Sociological Review, 38(4), 689–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 15.
    Oliver, N. and Wilkinson, B. (1992).The Japanization of British Industry (Second Edition), Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    Parker, M. and Slaughter, J. (1993). “Should the labour movement buy TQM?”Journal of Organisational Change Management, 6(4), 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 17.
    Pollert, A. (1996). “Team work” on the assembly line: contradiction and the dynamics of union resilience, in P. Ackers, C. Smith and P. Smith (eds)The New Workplace and Trade Unionism, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    Rees, C. (1995). “Quality management and HRM in the service industry: some case study evidence,”Employee Relations, 17(3), 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 19.
    Rees, C. (1996). Employee Involvement in Quality Management Strategies: A Case Study Based Analysis, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
  19. 20.
    Rees, C., Scarbrough, H. and Terry, M. (1996). The People Management Implications of Leaner Ways of Working: The Warwick Report.IPD Issues in People Management No. 15, London: Institute of Personnel and Development.Google Scholar
  20. 21.
    Rosenthal, P., Hill, S. and Peccei, R. (1997). “Checking out service: evaluating excellence, HRM and TQM in retailing”,Work, Employment and Society.Google Scholar
  21. 22.
    Scott, A. (1994).Willing Slaves? British Workers Under Human Resource Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. 23.
    Sewell, G. and Wilkinson, B. (1992). “Someone to watch over me”: surveillance, discipline and the just-in-time labour process”,Sociology, 26, 271–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 24.
    Storey, J. (ed.) (1994).New Wave Manufacturing Strategies: Organizational and Human Resource Management Dimensions, London: Chapman.Google Scholar
  24. 25.
    Thompson, P., Wallace, T., Flecker, J. and Ahlstrand, R. (1995). “In ain’t what you do, it’s the way that you do it: production organisation and skill utilisation in commercial vehicles”Work, Employment and Society, 9, 719–42.Google Scholar
  25. 26.
    TUC (1996). Partners for Progress: Next Steps for the New Unionism, London: Trades Union Congress.Google Scholar
  26. 27.
    Waldman, D.A. (1994). “The contribution of total quality management to a theory of work performance”,Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 510–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 28.
    Walton, R.E. (1985). “From control to commitment at the workplace”,Harvard Business Review, 63, 77–84.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. 29.
    Webb, J. (1996). “Vocabularies of motive and the “new” management”,Work, Employment and Society, 10, 251–72.Google Scholar
  29. 30.
    Wickens, P. (1987).The Road to Nissan: Flexibility, Quality and Teamwork, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. 31.
    Wilkinson, A., Godfrey, G. and Marchington, M. (1997) “Bouquets, brickbats and blinkers: total quality management and employee involvement in practice”,Organizational Studies, 18(5), 799–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 32.
    Williamson, H. (1989). “Back to the melting pot?: re-thinking trade union perspectives on Japanese motor industry investment in Britain and Japanese-style industrial relations”, paper presented atConference of Socialist Economists.Google Scholar
  32. 33.
    Winchester, D. and Bach, S. (1995). “The state: the public sector, in P. K. Edwards (ed.)Industrial Relations, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  33. 34.
    Womack, J., Jones, D.T. and Roos, D. (1990).The Machine that Changed the World, New York: Rawson.Google Scholar
  34. 35.
    Wright, M. and Edwards, P.K. (1998). “Does teamworking work, and if so, why?: a case study in the aluminium industry”,Economic and Industrial Democracy. (forthcoming)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Human Resource ManagementKingston UniversityKingstonUK

Personalised recommendations