Skip to main content
Log in

Fracture and fatigue in M-50 and 18-4-1 high speed steels

  • Mechanical Behavior
  • Published:
Metallurgical Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The plane strain fracture toughness values,K Ic , the fatigue crack growth rates and the tensile properties of M-50 and 18-4-1 high speed steels have been measured as a function of tempering temperature. The M-50 was a vacuum arc remelted grade (VIM-VAR) and the 18-4-1 an electroslag grade, and both are used in mainshaft gas turbine bearings. At the usual hardness for bearings, Rockwell C 62, 18-4-1 exhibited a slightly higher fracture toughness (21 MPa·m1/2) than M-50 (18 MPa·m1/2). The fatigue crack growth rates were very similar, and in the slow growth region followed the usual power law,dC/dN=(ΔK)m withm=3 to 4. The crack propagation rates were still significant at values as low as ΔK=5 MPa·m1/2. SEM studies of the fracture surfaces showed complex transgranular fracture paths for both steels. The tensile strengths and the elongations of M-50 were somewhat higher than the corresponding values for 18-4-1 but the yield strengths of the two steels were similar. The microstructures of these steels were markedly different, with M-50 exhibiting 2.6 vol pct undissolved carbides and the 18-4-1 showing 15.2 vol pct carbides, but the fatigue and fracture behaviors were similar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. E. Littman and R. L. Widner:J. Basic Eng., 1966, vol. 88, pp. 624–36.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. E. Tallian:ASLE Trans, 1967, vol. 10, pp. 418–39.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. L. Averbach:Proc. Fourth Int. Conf. on Fracture, D. Taplin, ed., vol. 1, pp. 201–213, University of Waterloo Press, Waterloo, Canada, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Eriksson:Scand. J. Metall., 1973, vol. 2, pp. 197–203.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. R. Johnson:Met. Trans. A, 1977, vol. 8A, pp. 891–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. A. Rescalvo and B. L. Averbach: Unpublished research, MIT, Cambridge, MA 1978.

  7. J. E. Bridge, Jr., G. N. Maniar, and T. V. Philip:Met. Trans., 1971, vol. 2, pp. 2209–14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. F. Kayser and M. Cohen:Met. Prog., 1952, vol. 61, pp. 79–85

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. W. Hume-Rothery:The Structures of Alloys of Iron, p. 297, and pp. 257–63, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Mukherjee: ISI Publication 126, pp. 80–96, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Durnin and K. A. Ridal:J. Iron Steel Inst. 1968, vol. 206, pp. 60–67.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. J. R. Rice and M. A. Johnson:Inelastic Behavior of Solids, M. F. Kanninen et al., eds., pp. 641–70, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rescalvo, J.A., Averbach, B.L. Fracture and fatigue in M-50 and 18-4-1 high speed steels. Metall Trans A 10, 1265–1271 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02811982

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02811982

Keywords

Navigation