Fracture and fatigue in M-50 and 18-4-1 high speed steels
- 95 Downloads
The plane strain fracture toughness values,K Ic , the fatigue crack growth rates and the tensile properties of M-50 and 18-4-1 high speed steels have been measured as a function of tempering temperature. The M-50 was a vacuum arc remelted grade (VIM-VAR) and the 18-4-1 an electroslag grade, and both are used in mainshaft gas turbine bearings. At the usual hardness for bearings, Rockwell C 62, 18-4-1 exhibited a slightly higher fracture toughness (21 MPa·m1/2) than M-50 (18 MPa·m1/2). The fatigue crack growth rates were very similar, and in the slow growth region followed the usual power law,dC/dN=(ΔK) m withm=3 to 4. The crack propagation rates were still significant at values as low as ΔK=5 MPa·m1/2. SEM studies of the fracture surfaces showed complex transgranular fracture paths for both steels. The tensile strengths and the elongations of M-50 were somewhat higher than the corresponding values for 18-4-1 but the yield strengths of the two steels were similar. The microstructures of these steels were markedly different, with M-50 exhibiting 2.6 vol pct undissolved carbides and the 18-4-1 showing 15.2 vol pct carbides, but the fatigue and fracture behaviors were similar.
KeywordsFracture Toughness Fatigue Crack Crack Growth Rate Fatigue Crack Growth Fatigue Crack Propagation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.W. E. Littman and R. L. Widner:J. Basic Eng., 1966, vol. 88, pp. 624–36.Google Scholar
- 2.T. E. Tallian:ASLE Trans, 1967, vol. 10, pp. 418–39.Google Scholar
- 3.B. L. Averbach:Proc. Fourth Int. Conf. on Fracture, D. Taplin, ed., vol. 1, pp. 201–213, University of Waterloo Press, Waterloo, Canada, 1977.Google Scholar
- 4.K. Eriksson:Scand. J. Metall., 1973, vol. 2, pp. 197–203.Google Scholar
- 6.J. A. Rescalvo and B. L. Averbach: Unpublished research, MIT, Cambridge, MA 1978.Google Scholar
- 7.J. E. Bridge, Jr., G. N. Maniar, and T. V. Philip:Met. Trans., 1971, vol. 2, pp. 2209–14.Google Scholar
- 8.F. Kayser and M. Cohen:Met. Prog., 1952, vol. 61, pp. 79–85Google Scholar
- 9.W. Hume-Rothery:The Structures of Alloys of Iron, p. 297, and pp. 257–63, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1966.Google Scholar
- 10.T. Mukherjee: ISI Publication 126, pp. 80–96, 1970.Google Scholar
- 11.J. Durnin and K. A. Ridal:J. Iron Steel Inst. 1968, vol. 206, pp. 60–67.Google Scholar
- 12.J. R. Rice and M. A. Johnson:Inelastic Behavior of Solids, M. F. Kanninen et al., eds., pp. 641–70, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970.Google Scholar