Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B

, Volume 2, Issue 12, pp 3277–3282 | Cite as

Growth of aluminum antimonide in solid aluminum-liquid antimony diffusion couples

  • N. Grado
  • L. S. Castleman
Transport Phenomena


An investigation was made of the isothermal growth of the intermediate alloy phase aluminum antimonide AlSb, at the interfaces of diffusion couples consisting either of solid aluminum and liquid antimony or of solid aluminum and of an Sb−Al alloy slightly supersaturated in AlSb. The diffusion anneals were carried out in the temperature range 635° to 655°C and for times up to 48 hr. In the solid aluminum vs liquid antimony couples, it was found that considerable dissolution of solid aluminum occurred at the solid-liquid interface before the first crystals of AlSb appeared. Subsequently, a two-phase region, consisting of AlSb crystals of greatly varying sizes interspersed throughout the liquid antimony developed between the instantaneous solid-liquid interface and the original solid-liquid interface. The results suggest that the dominant mechanism influencing the growth of AlSb in these diffusion couples is diffusional mass transport of aluminum in liquid antimony. The rapid diffusion of aluminum leads first to the dissolution of solid aluminum and saturation of the liquid antimony, and next to the growth of large discrete crystals of AlSb presumably via an Ostwald-ripening mechanism.


Antimony Diffusion Couple AlSb Solid Aluminum Indium Arsenide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. E. Lyttle, P. V. Dembowski, and L. S. Castleman:Met. Trans., 1971, vol. 2, pp. 303–04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. W. Faust, Jr. and H. F. John:J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 1964, vol. 25, pp. 1407–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. W. Faust, Jr. and H. F. John:J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 1962, vol. 23, pp. 1119–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Chalmers:Principles of Solidification, p. 133, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., N.Y., 1964.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Hansen:Constitution of Binary Alloys, 2nd ed., p. 130, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., N.Y., 1958.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. deBarry Barnett and C. L. Wilson.Inorganic Chemistry, 2nd ed., p. 450, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., N.Y., 1960.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. W. Greenwood:Acta Met., 1956, vol. 4, pp. 243–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. W. Cahn and R. E. Hanneman:Surface Sci., 1964, vol. 1, pp. 387–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. I. Aaronson, C. Laird, and K. R. Kinsman:Phase Transformations, pp. 313–90, American Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1970.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. V. Azaroff:J. Appl. Phys., 1961, vol. 32, pp. 1658–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Silverman, L. S. Castleman, and C. F. Tufts:Trans. ASM, 1966, vol. 59, pp. 185–94.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Frank G. Armao and L. S. Castleman: Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, unpublished work, 1970.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. MacAuley and F. Weinberg:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1969, vol. 245, pp. 1831–32.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. W. Carslaw and J. C. Jaeger:Conduction of Heat in Solids, 2nd ed., p. 291, Oxford Univ. Press, London, 1959.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Metallurgical Society of American Institute of Mining, Mitallurgical and Petroleum Engineers, Inc., and American Society for Metals 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Grado
    • 1
  • L. S. Castleman
    • 2
  1. 1.serving in the U.S. Peace CorpsUSA
  2. 2.Department of Physical and Engineering MetallurgyPolytechnic Institute of BrooklynBrooklynUSA

Personalised recommendations