Advertisement

Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 44–50 | Cite as

Considerations for conducting psychological pre-employment interviews of law enforcement office applicants

  • James Janik
  • D. Diplomate
Article

Keywords

Negative Information Appeal Process Criminal Psychology Police Applicant Police Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, M. (1971). Psychiatric Screening of Urban Police Candidates.Journal of National Medical Association, 63(1) 50–51.Google Scholar
  2. Arvey, R. (1979). Unfair Discrimination in the Employment Interview: Legal and Psychologically Aspects.Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 86(4) 736–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, L. (1990). “The Untapped Potential of Psychological Assessments.”Police Chief, 2:23–25.Google Scholar
  4. Blum, R.; Goggen, W.; Whitmore, E.; Pomeray, W. (1962). A Further Study of Deputy Sheriff Selection ProceduresPolice 79 (2).Google Scholar
  5. Blum, R.; Goggen, W.; Whitmore, E. (1961) A Study of Deputy Sheriff Selection Procedures.Police 62. (30).Google Scholar
  6. Cavanaugh, J., Ostrov, E., Inwald, R., Girado, M., Janik, J. (1988) Police-related Psychiatric/Psychological Evaluations.Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, San Francisco, California, October 20–23, p. 47.Google Scholar
  7. Chandler, J. (190). Modern Polcie Psychology. Charles Thomas. Springfield, IL.Google Scholar
  8. Dietz, P., Reese, J. (1986). The Perils of Police Psychology: Ten Strategies for Minimizing Role Conflicts When Providing Mental Health Services and Consultation to Law Enforcement Agencies.Behavioral Science and the Law. 4 (4), p. 385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Employee Polygraph Protection Act. (1989) USC Title 29, Section 2001 et seq.Google Scholar
  10. Flotz, D. Detroit v. NLRB: High Court Rules to Protect Job Testing Confidentiality.APA Monitor, April, 1979. p. 1.Google Scholar
  11. Green v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, (1985) 523 F. 2d 1290.Google Scholar
  12. Hargrave, G. and Hiatt, D. (1986).Law Enforcement Selection With the Interview. MMPI and CPI:A Study of Reliability and Validity. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  13. Harless v. Duck, 14 FEP 1616 (1977).Google Scholar
  14. Hester v. Southern Railway Company, 8 FEP 646 (1974).Google Scholar
  15. Inwald, R., Knodz, H., Shusman, L. (1983)Inwald Personality Inventory Manual, New York: Hilson ResearchGoogle Scholar
  16. Inwald, R. (1987)Five-Year Follow-up Study of Departmental Determinations As Predicted By Sixteen Pre-employment Psychological Indicators. Personal Communication.Google Scholar
  17. Inwald, R. (1989). The Hilson Research Model:A Guide for Conducting Interviews and Preparing Psychological Screening Reports. Paper presented at the annual APA convention, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  18. Janik, J. (1988).Improving the Validity of Police Applicant Interviews. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  19. Keith-Speigel, P. and Koocher, G. (1985).Ethics in Psychology: Professional Standards and Cases, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  20. Kin-v. New Hampshire Department of Resources of Economic Development, 15, FEP 669 (1977).Google Scholar
  21. Landy, F., Farr, J., Sall, F. and Freytag, W. (1976). Behaviorally Anchored Scales for Rating the Performance of Police Officers.Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 61, No. 6, p. 750–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leflowitz, J. (1975). Psychological Attributes of Policemen: A Review of Research and Opinion.I. Social Issues. 31(1) 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Longsdale, J. & Weitz, J. (1973). Estimating the Influence of Job Information on Interview Agreement.Journal of Applied Psychology. 57, 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meloy, J. (1987). Raw Psychological Data Protected.The Californian Psychologist July/August, 7.Google Scholar
  25. Murphy, J. (1972). Current Practices in the Use of Psychological Testing by Police Agencies.Criminal L. C. & P.S., 63(4) 570–576.Google Scholar
  26. Ostrov, E.; Dawkins, M.; Dawkins, M.; Cavanaugh, J.; (1989). A Test of Interviewer Bias in Police Psychological Screening. Presented at the 1989 Annual Meetings of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  27. Police Psychology Services Section (1990) “Guidelines for Pre-Employment Psychological Testing”.Police Chief, 62:2, 21–25.Google Scholar
  28. Roulette v. C.M.S. (1986) 490 N.E. 2d 60.Google Scholar
  29. Rowe v. General Motors, (1972) 4 FEP 445.Google Scholar
  30. Space, L. (1981). The Computer and the Psychometrician.Behavior Research Methods and Instumentation, Vol. 13, p. 595–606.Google Scholar
  31. Ulrich, D, Trurnbo, D. (1965). The Selection Interviews Since 1949.Psychological Bulletin, 63.Google Scholar
  32. United States v. Hazelwood School District, 11 EPD 10854 (1976).Google Scholar
  33. Washington State Human Rights Commission.State and Local Laws: Text of Laws. Fair Employment Practices, 1979, Sec 457, 2923–2926.Google Scholar
  34. Weiner v. County of Oakland, 14 FEP 330 (1976).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Police and Criminal Psychology 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Janik
    • 1
  • D. Diplomate
    • 1
  1. 1.Police Psychology Isaac Ray CenterChicago

Personalised recommendations