Skip to main content
Log in

Contractions ofSU(1, n) andSU(n+1) via Berezin quantization

  • Published:
Journal d’Analyse Mathématique Aims and scope

Abstract

We establish contractions of discrete series representations ofSU(1,n) and of unitary irreducible representations ofSU(n+1) to the unitary irreducible representations of the (2n+1)-dimensional Heisenberg group by use of the Berezin calculus on the coadjoint orbits associated to these representations by the Kirillov-Kostant method of orbits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Arnal, M. Cahen and S. Gutt,Star exponential and holomorphic discrete series, Bull. Soc. Math. Belg., Sér. B41 (1989), 207–227.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. F. A. Berezin,Quantization, Math. USSR Izv.8 (1974), 1109–1165.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. F. A. Berezin,Quantization in complex symmetric spaces, Math. USSR Izv.9 (1975), 341–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. B. Cahen,Deformation program for principal series representations, Lett. Math. Phys.36 (1996), 65–75.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. B. Cahen,Quantification d'orbites coadjointes et théorie des contractions, J. Lie Theory11 (2001), 257–272.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. B. Cahen,Contraction de SU(2) vers le groupe de Heisenberg et calcul de Berezin, Beiträge Algebra Geom.44 (2003), 581–603.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Cahen,Contraction de SU(1, 1) vers le groupe de Heisenberg, preprint, Univ. Metz (2003); Travaux Mathématiques16 (2005), to appear.

  8. M. Cahen, S. Gutt and J. Rawnsley,Quantization on Kahler manifolds I: Geometric interpretation of Berezin quantization, J. Geom. Phys.7 (1990), 45–62.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Cishahayo and S. De Bievre,On the contraction of the discrete series of SU(1, 1), Ann. Inst. Fourier43 (1993), 551–567.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Cotton and A. H. Dooley,Contraction of an adapted functional calculus, J. Lie Theory7 (1997), 147–164.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. A. H. Dooley,Contractions of Lie Groups and applications to analysis, inTopics in Modern Harmonic Analysis, Proc. Semin., Torino and Milano 1982, Vol. 1, Ist. di Alta Mat., Rome, 1983, pp. 483–515.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. H. Dooley and S. K. Gupta,The contraction of S 2p−1 to Hp−1, Monatsh. Math.128 (1999), 237–253.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. A. H. Dooley and S. K. Gupta,Transferring Fourier multipliers from S 2p−1 to Hp−1, Illinois J. Math.46 (2002), 657–677.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. A. H. Dooley and J. W. Rice,On contractions of semisimple Lie groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.289 (1985), 185–202.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. G. Folland,Harmonic Analysis in Phase Space, Princeton Univ. Press, 1989.

  16. R. Howe,On the role of the Heisenberg group in harmonic analysis, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.3 (1980), 821–843.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Inönü and E. P. Wigner,On the contraction of groups and their representations, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.39 (1953), 510–524.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. A. W. Knapp,Representation Theory of Semisimple Groups. An Overview Based on Examples, Princeton Univ. Press, 1986.

  19. M. Levy-Nahas,Représentations des groupes de Heisenberg, inReprésentations des groupes de Lie résolubles (P. Bernat et al., eds.), Dunod, Paris, 1972, pp. 153–175.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Mickelsson and J. Niederle,Contractions of representations of de Sitter groups, Comm. Math. Phys.27 (1972), 167–180.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Moreno,Invariant star products and representations of compact semisimple Lie groups, Lett. Math. Phys.13 (1986), 217–229.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. C. Moreno and P. Ortega-Navarro,Deformations of the algebra of functions on Hermitian symmetric spaces resulting from quantization, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Sect. A38 (1983), 215–241.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. F. Ricci,A contraction of SU(2) to the Heisenberg group, Monatsh. Math.101 (1986), 211–225.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. F. Ricci and R. L. Rubin,Transferring Fourier multipliers from SU(2) to the Heisenberg group, Amer. J. Math.108 (1986), 571–588.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. V. S. Varadarajan,Lie Groups, Lie Algebras and Their Representations, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Vergne,Representations of Lie groups and the orbit method, inEmmy Noether in Bryn Mawr, Proc. Symp. Bryn Mawr, USA, 1982, Springer, New York, 1983, pp. 59–101.

    Google Scholar 

  27. E. Weimar-Woods,The three-dimensional real Lie algebras and their contractions, J. Math. Phys.32 (1991), 2028–2033.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Cahen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cahen, B. Contractions ofSU(1, n) andSU(n+1) via Berezin quantization. J. Anal. Math. 97, 83–101 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02807403

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02807403

Keywords

Navigation