Skip to main content
Log in

A first approach to the molecular phylogeny of the genusEchinops (Asteraceae): Sectional delimitation and relationships with the genusAcantholepis

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A first attempt to establish the phylogeny of the generaEchinops andAcantholepis has been carried out using the analysis of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) sequences of the nuclear ribosomal DNA including 30Echinops species and the only species of the monotypicAcantholepis. The results of this analysis are discussed in the light of morphological and cytogenetic characters. The genusAcantholepis is placed in a robust clade withEchinops nanus, and together they appear in a basal position to other members ofEchinops. The ITS phylogeny and several other characters, such as chromosome number and nuclear DNA amount, do not agree with the sections currently recognized withinEchinops. Some groups are defined in the present approach, but further studies are necessary to reach a complete, stable and natural infrageneric classification of this genus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Álvarez I. &Wendel J.F. (2003): Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference.Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 29: 417–434.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham G. (1873):Compositae. In:Bentham G. &Hooker J.D. (eds.),Genera plantarum 2, Reeve and Co., London, pp. 163–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett M.D. (1972): Nuclear DNA amount and minimum generation time in herbaceous plants.Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 191: 109–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremer K. (1988): The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction.Evolution 42: 795–803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bremer K. (1994): Asteraceae:Cladistics and classification. Timber Press, Portland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candolle A.P. (1837):Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 6. Treuttel et Würtz, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis P.H. (ed.) (1975):Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands 5. University Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrova D. &Greilhuber J. (2000): Karyotype and DNA-content evolution in ten species ofCrepis (Asteraceae) distributed in Bulgaria.Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 132: 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittrich M. (1977):Cynareae-Systematic review. In:Heywood V.H., Harborne J.B. &Turner B.L. (eds.),The biology and chemistry of the Compositae 2, Academic Press, London, pp. 999–1015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittrich M. (1996): Die Bedeutung morphologischer und anatomischer Achänen-Merkmale für die Systematik der TribusEchinopeae Cass. undCarlineae Cass.Boissiera 51: 9–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle J.J. &Doyle J.L. (1987): A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue.Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J. (1985): Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap.Evolution 39: 783–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia S., Sanz M., Garnatje T., Kreitschitz A., McArthur E.D. &Vallès J. (2004): Variation of DNA amount in 47 populations of the subtribeArtemisiinae and related taxa (Asteraceae, Anthemideae): karyological, ecological, and systematic implications.Genome 47: 1004–1014.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Jacas N., Garnatje T., Susanna A. &Vilatersana R. (2002): Tribal and subtribal delimitation and phylogeny of theCardueae (Asteraceae): a combined nuclear and chloroplast DNA analysis.Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 22: 51–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garnatje T., Vallès J., Garcia S., Hidalgo O., Sanz M., Canela M.A. &Siljak-Yakovlev S. (2004a): Genome size inEchinops L. and related genera (Asteraceae, Cardueae): karyological, ecological and phylogenetic implications.Biol. Cell 96: 117–124.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garnatje T., Vilatersana R., Susanna A., Vallès J. &Siljak-Yakovlev S. (2004b): Contribution to the karyological knowledge ofEchinops L. (Asteraceae, Cardueae) and related genera.Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 145: 337–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greuter W. (2003): The Euro+Med treatment ofCardueae (Compositae) — generic concepts and required new names.Willdenowia 33: 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann O. (1894):Compositae. In:Engler A. &Prantl K. (eds.),Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Engelmann, Leipzig, vol. 4, pp. 87–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäger E.J. (1987): Arealkarten derAsteraceen-Tribus als Grundlage der ökogeographischen Sippencharakteristik.Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 108: 481–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kit Tan K. (1995): Seven new species ofEchinops (Asteraceae).Ann. Bot. Fenn. 32: 117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kožuharov S. (1976):Echinops L. In:Tutin et al. (eds.),Flora Europaea 4, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 212–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse J. &Meusel H. (1972): Zur Blattfolge und Blattbildung einiger Cynareen-Gattungen. 2.Acantholepis, Xeranthemum, Chardinia, Siebera, Amphoricarpos. Feddes Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 83: 289–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitch I.J., Chase M.W., Bennett M.D. (1998): Phylogenetic analysis of DNA C-values provides evidence for a small ancestral genome size in flowering plants.Ann. Bot. (Oxford) 82: 85–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maddison D.R. (1991): The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most parsimonious trees.Syst. Zool. 40: 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehra P.N., Gill B.S., Mehta J.K. &Sidhu S.S. (1965): Cytological investigations on the IndianCompositae. I. North-Indian taxa.Caryologia 18: 35–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan D.R. (1997): Decay analysis of large sets of phylogenetic data.Taxon 46: 509–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore R.J. (1973): Index to plant chromosome numbers 1967–1971.Regnum Veg. 90.

  • Murray B.G., Cameron E.K. &Stardring L.S. (1992): Chromosome numbers, karyotypes, and nuclear DNA variation inPratia Gaudin (Lobeliaceae).New Zealand J. Bot. 30: 181–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickrent D.L., Schuette K.P. &Starr E.M. (1994): A molecular phylogeny ofArceuthobium (Viscaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences.Amer. J. Bot. 81: 1149–1160.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ohri D. (1996): Genome size and polyploidy variation in the tropical hardwood genusTerminalia (Combretaceae).Pl. Syst. Evol. 200: 225–232.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petit D.P. (1988): Le genreEchinops L. (Compositae, Cardueae). 1. Position phylétique et interprétation de l’incapitulescence.Candollea 43: 467–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit D.P. (1997): Generic interrelationships of theCardueae (Compositae): A cladistic analysis of morphological data.Pl. Syst. Evol. 207: 173–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit D.P., Mathez J. &Qaid A. (1996): Early differentiation of theCardueae sensu lato, morphology and pollen. In:Hind D.J.N. &Beentje H.J. (eds.),Compositae: Systematics. Proceedings of the International Compositae Conference 1, Kew, 1994, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp. 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pignatti S. (ed.) (1982):Flora d’Italia 3. Edagricole, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rechinger K.H. (ed.) (1979):Flora des Iranischen Hochlandes und der umrahmenden Gebirge. CompositaeIII — Cynareae. Akademische Druck-u. Verlagsanstalt, Graz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shishkin B.K. & Bobrov E.G. (eds.) (1997):Flora of the USSR 27. Bishen Singh, Mahendra Pal Singh and Koeltz Scientific Books, Dehra Dun.

  • Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S., Collier T.G. &Edgerton M.L. (1991): TheHeuchera group (Saxifragaceae): Evidence for chloroplast transfer and paraphyly.Amer. J. Bot. 78: 1091–1112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Susanna A. &Garcia-Jacas N. (2005): The tribeCardueae. In:Kubitzki J. (ed.),The families and genera of vascular plants, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford D.L. (1999):PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomšovic P. (1997): Some palynological observations on the genusEchinops (Asteraceae) and their taxonomic implications.Preslia 69: 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdés B. (1996): Tres nuevas combinaciones enAsteraceae.Lagascalia 18: 306.

    Google Scholar 

  • White T.J., Bruns T., Lee S. &Taylor J. (1990): Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In:Innis M., Gelfand D., Sninsky J. &White T. (eds.),PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 315–322.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa Garnatje.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garnatje, T., Susanna, A., Garcia-Jacas, N. et al. A first approach to the molecular phylogeny of the genusEchinops (Asteraceae): Sectional delimitation and relationships with the genusAcantholepis . Folia Geobot 40, 407–419 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02804288

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02804288

Keywords

Navigation