Skip to main content
Log in

Leibniz on evil

  • Published:
Sophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz,Theodicy, ed. by Diogenes Allen, Bobbs-Merrill, 1966, II, 122.

  2. John Hick,Evil and the God of Love (New York: Harper and Row, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nicholas Rescher,The Philosophy of Leibniz (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1967), p. 45, argues persuasively that Leibniz insisted here on necessary being rather than supreme perfection because his desire is to preserve the freedom of God.

    Google Scholar 

  4. On this issue, see my “One God, One Proof,”Southern Journal of Philosophy (6: 235–45), Winter, 1968.

  5. As Rescher (op. cit. ), p. 79) points out, Leibniz does not argue adequately for the genuineness of relational properties (properties not wholly represented by mere predicates), and unless there are such relational properties it could never be maintained that any two possible substances could be incompossible.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See my “Existence as a Perfection: A Reconsideration of the Ontological Argument” (Religious Studies 4, 1968, pp. 78–101) for a more complete treatment of this issue.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Howe, L.T. Leibniz on evil. SOPH 10, 8–17 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02804262

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02804262

Keywords

Navigation