Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Theodicy and Mary Baker Eddy

  • Published:
Sophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mary Baker Eddy.Science and Health, (Boston: Trustees under the will of Mary Baker Eddy, 1875), p. 230.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid., p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., p. 330.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid., p. 417.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. W. Leibniz,Theodicy (reprinted/London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1951), p. 197.

  6. See B.A.O. Williams, “Knowledge and Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind”,Philosophical Review, LXXVII (1968), p. 228. If Williams were justifiably apprehensive, then to that extent he should be convinced of the adequacy of Mary Baker Eddy's theodicy. This could be viewed, not unreasonably, as areductio of his position.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Antony Flew, “Divine Omnipotence and Human Freedom”,New Essays in Philosophical Theology, ed. Antony Flew and Alasdair MacIntyre (London: SCM Press, 1955), p. 155.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mark Twain,Christian Science (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1907), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid., p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Calgary, Canada

    H. B. McCullough

Authors
  1. H. B. McCullough
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCullough, H.B. Theodicy and Mary Baker Eddy. SOPH 14, 12–18 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02804253

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02804253

Keywords

Search

Navigation