Skip to main content
Log in

Developmental responses of subdominant grassland species to current weather conditions and their relevance for annual vegetation changes

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Year-to-year vegetation changes have been observed many times in temperate grasslands. Ordinarily, variation in annual weather patterns is considered responsible for these changes. However, the exact mechanisms of vegetation dynamics have seldom been studied. In order to analyse the direct response of plants to distinct weather situations, the shoot growth rates of three subdominant grassland species were determined during three growing seasons and tested for significant relationships to meteorological variables measured simultaneously in the study site. Half of the shoots grew in the natural community with competition from neighbouring plants. For the other half, above-ground interference was avoided by regularly clipping the surrounding vegetation. The results lead to the distinction of three different impact patterns of current weather conditions on the growth of subdominant grassland species: (i) As a consequence of extraordinary weather conditions, e.g. lasting periods of drought in the summer, plants die completely or partially or pass into secondary dormancy. Such weather situations may cause quantitative or even qualitative changes in species composition by altering the density and frequency of the species involved. (ii) Major divergences from average weather conditions, such as unusually warm or cold periods in the spring, affect the growth of subdominant species and may therefore lead to quantitative annual variation of the species involved in terms of cover or biomass. (iii) Average weather conditions with slight deviations from the long-term means of the weather variables do not produce detectable direct growth responses and therefore average weather conditions are not key factors for year-to-year variations in the quantitative or qualitative performance of subdominant species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albertson F.W. &Tomanek G.W. (1965): Vegetation changes during a 30-year period in grassland communities near Hays, Kansas.Ecology 46: 714–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaubien E.G. &Johnson D.L. (1994): Flowering plant phenology and weather in Alberta, Canada.Int. J. Biometeorol. 38: 23–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins S.L., Bradford J.A. &Sims P.L. (1987): Succession and fluctuation inArtemisia dominated grassland.Vegetatio 73: 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cytel (1995):StatXact for Windows. Statistical software for exact nonparametric inference. Cytel Software Corporation, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel W.W. (1990):Applied nonparametric statistics. Ed. 2. PWS-Kent, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann M. (1996): Relationship between flowering phenology of perennial herbs and meteorological data in deciduous forests of Sweden.Canad. J. Bot. 74: 528–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierschke H. (1985): Experimentelle Untersuchung zur Bestandesdynamik von Kalkmagerrasen (Mesobromion) in Südniedersachsen. I. Vegetationsentwicklung auf Dauerflächen 1972–1984. In:Schreiber K.F. (ed.), Sukzession auf Grünlandbrachen,Münstersche Geogr. Arbeiten 20: 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnett N.P., Willis A.J., Hunt R. &Grime J.P. (1998): A 38-year study of relations between weather and vegetation dynamics in road verges near Bibury, Gloucestershire.J. Ecol. 86: 610–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnett N.P. &Grime J.P. (1999): Competition as an amplifier of short-term vegetation responses to climate: an experimental test.Funct. Ecol. 13: 388–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnett N.P. &Willis A.J. (2000): Dynamics ofChamerion angustifolium in grassland vegetation over a thirty-nine-year period.Pl. Ecol. 148: 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H. (1996):Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen. Ed. 5. Ulmer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espigares T. &Peco B. (1995): Mediterranean annual pasture dynamics: impact of autumn drought.J. Ecol. 83: 135–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenner M. (1998): The phenology of growth and reproduction in plants.Perspect. Pl. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 1: 78–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa M.E. &Davy A.J. (1991): Response of mediterranean grassland species to changing rainfall.J. Ecol. 79: 925–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitter A.H., Fitter R.S.R., Harris I.T.B. &Williamson M.H. (1995): Relationships between first flowering date and temperature in the flora of a locality in central England.Funct. Ecol. 9: 55–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime J.P. (2001):Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties. Ed. 2. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herben T., Krahulec F., Hadincová V. &Pecháčková S. (1995): Climatic variability and grassland community composition over 10 years: separating effects on module biomass and number of modules.Funct. Ecol. 9: 767–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs R.J. &Mooney H.A. (1991): Effects of rainfall variability and gopher disturbance on serpentine annual grassland dynamics.Ecology 72: 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houle G. &Phillips D.L. (1989): Seasonal variation and annual fluctuation in granite outcrop plant communities.Vegetatio 80: 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kammer P.M. (1997): Räumliche, zeitliche und witterungsbedingte Variabilität eines Trespen-Halbtrockenrasens (Mesobromion) im Schweizer Mittelland (Spatial, temporal and weather influenced variability of aBromus erectus-dominated grassland in the Swiss midlands).Diss. Bot. 272: 1–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammer P.M. (1998): Erfolgskontrolle im Naturschutz: Eine Methode für die repräsentative Überwachung von Pflanzenbeständen mit Dauerflächen.Z. Ökol. Naturschutz 7: 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P. &Legendre L. (1998):Numerical ecology. Ed. 2. Developments in environmental modelling 20. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milchunas D.G., Lauenroth W.K., Chapman P.L. &Kazempour M.K. (1989): Effects of grazing, topography, and precipitation on the structure of a semiarid grassland.Vegetatio 80: 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peco B. (1989): Modelling mediterranean grassland dynamics.Vegetatio 83: 269–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pors B. &Werner P.A. (1989): Individual flowering time in a Goldenrod (Solidago canadensis): field experiment shows genotype more important than environment.Amer. J. Bot. 76: 1681–1688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosén E. (1995): Periodic droughts and long-term dynamics of alvar grassland vegetation on Öland, Sweden.Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 30: 131–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala O.E., Parton W.J., Joyce L.A. &Lauenroth W.K. (1988): Primary production of the Central Grassland region of the United States.Ecology 69: 40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt J. &Wulff R.D. (1993): Light spectral quality, phytochrome and plant competition.Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown J., Dodd M.E., McConway K., Potts J. &Crawley M. (1994): Rainfall, biomass variation, and community composition in the Park Grass Experiment.Ecology 75: 2430–2437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith H. (1995): Physiological and ecological function within the phytochrome family.Annual Rev. Pl. Physiol. 46: 289–315.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spano D., Cesaraccio C., Duce P. &Snyder R.L. (1999): Phenological stages of natural species and their use as climate indicators.Int. J. Biometeorol. 42: 124–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks T.H. &Carey P.D. (1995): The responses of species to climate over two centuries: an analysis of the Marsham phenological record 1736–1947.J. Ecol. 83: 321–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stampfli A. (1995): Species composition and standing crop variation in an unfertilized meadow and its relationship to climatic variability during six years.Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 30: 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoutjesdijk P. &Barkman J.J. (1992):Microclimate, vegetation and fauna. Opulus, Knivsta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D. &El Haddi A. (1992): Drought and biodiversity in grasslands.Oecologia 89: 257–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Maarel E. (1996): Pattern and process in the plant community: fifty years after A.S. Watt.J. Veg. Sci. 7: 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt A.S. (1971): Factors controlling the floristic composition of some plant communities in Breckland. In:Duffey E. &Watt A.S. (eds),The scientific management of animal and plant communities for conservation, Symposium of the British Ecological Society 11, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • White L.M. (1995): Predicting flowering of 130 plants at 8 locations with temperature and day-length.J. Range Managem. 48: 108–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kammer, P.M. Developmental responses of subdominant grassland species to current weather conditions and their relevance for annual vegetation changes. Folia Geobot 37, 185–204 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02804231

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02804231

Keywords

Navigation