Skip to main content
Log in

Picea abies andAbies alba forests of the austrian alps: Numerical classification and ordination

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A TWINSPAN classification of a representative set of 3026 relevés of spruce and fir forests from the Eastern Alps (Austria) is presented. Ecological features of relevé clusters and species groups are described by means of Ellenberg indicator values, site factors and stand characteristics. The most important floristic discontinuity in the data set separates acidophilous communities on mostly silicate substrates from basiphilous communities on mostly carbonate substrates. Further divisions reflect a combined gradient of temperature, nutrient regime and shading. This is supported by the correlation of average Ellenberg values of sample plots with DCA axes. A qualitative comparison between TWINSPAN clusters and a syntaxonomic system widely used in the Austrian Alps is drawn. The two ordersPiceetalia excelsae andAthyrio-Piceetalia largely coincide with the clusters of the first level of divisions. Alliances are partly reproduced by TWINSPAN. Clusters on the fifth and fourth level of division mostly correspond to associations. However, a considerable portion of the lower level clusters is of a transitional type. Out of thirteen fir and spruce associations described for the Austrian Alps, five associations are not reproduced by TWINSPAN, i.e.Bazzanio-Piceetum, Veronico-Piceetum, Adenostylo alliariae-Abietetum, Asplenio-Piceetum andCarici-Piceetum. Three associations are split on the second level of division, i.e.Larici-Piceetum, Luzulo nemorosae-Piceetum andCalamagrostio variae-Piceetum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler W., Oswald K. &Fischer R. (1994):Exkursionsflora von Österreich. Ulmer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aichinger E. (1933):Vegetationskunde der Karawanken. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun-Blanquet J. (1964):Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. Ed. 3. Springer Verlag, Wien, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun-Blanquet J., Sissingh G. &Vlieger J. (1939):Prodromus der Pflanzengesellschaften. Klasse der Vaccinio-Piceetea (Nadelholz- und Vaccinienheiden-Verbände der eurosibirisch-nordamerikanischen Region). Mari-Lavit, Montpellier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann M. &Lawesson J.E. (1999): Shifts in ecological behaviour of herbaceous forest species along a transect from northern Central to North Europe.Folia Geobot. 34: 127–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierschke H. (1994):Pflanzensoziologie: Grundlagen und Methoden. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H. (1996):Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer Sicht. Ed. 5. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H. &Klötzli F. (1972): Waldgesellschaften und Waldstandorte der Schweiz.Mitt. Schweiz. Anst. Forstl. Versuchswesen 48: 589–930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H., Weber H.E., Düll R., Wirth W., Werner W. &Paulißen D. (1992): Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Ed. 2.Scripta Geobot. 18: 1–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etter H. (1943): Über die Waldvegetation am Südostrand des schweizerischen Mittellandes.Mitt. Schweiz. Anst. Forstl. Versuchswesen 25: 141–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald J. (1997): Die Bergmischwälder der Bayerischen Alpen — Soziologie, Standortbindung und Verbreitung.Diss. Bot. 290: 1–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald J. (1999): Soziologie und Standortbindung subalpiner Fichtenwälder in den Bayerischen Alpen.Tuexenia 19: 107–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald J. (2000): The influence of coniferous canopies on understorey vegetation and soils in mountain forests of the northern Calcareous Alps.Appl. Veg. Sci. 3: 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exner A. (2001): Die Syntaxonomie mitteleuropäischer Tannen- und Fichtenwälder.Ber. Reinhold-Tüxen-Ges. 13: 241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey W., Frahm J.-P., Fischer E. &Lobin W. (1995):Die Moos- und Farnpflanzen Europas. Kleine Kryptogamenflora, Band IV. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, Jena, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glavač V. (1996):Vegetationsökologie. Grundfragen, Aufgaben, Methoden. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabherr G. &Mucina L. (1993): Einleitung zum Werk “Die Pflanzengesellschaften Österreichs”. In:Mucina L., Grabherr G. &Ellmauer T. (eds.),Die Pflanzengesellschaften Österreichs, Teil I, Anthropogene Vegetation, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, Stuttgart, New York, pp. 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennekens S.M. (1996):MEGATAB — a visual editor for phytosociological tables, version 1.0. Giesen & Geusts, Ulft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennekens S.M. &Schaminée J.H.J. (2001): TURBOVEG, a comprehensive data base management system for vegetation data.J. Veg. Sci. 12: 589–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill M.O. (1973): Reciprocal averaging: an eigenvector method of ordination.J. Ecol. 61: 237–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill M.O. (1979):TWINSPAN. A FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes. Cornell University, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill M.O. &Gauch H.G. (1980): Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique.Vegetatio 42: 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jelem H. &Kilian W. (1966): Standortserkundung mit Waldbaugrundlagen Murauer Nockberge, Revier Paal.Forstl. Bundes-Versuchsanst. 20: 1–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelem H. &Kilian W. (1975): Wälder und Standorte am steirischen Alpenostrand. Wuchsraum 18.Mitt. Forstl. Bundes-Versuchsanst. 111: 1–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelem H., Kilian W. &Neumann A. (1964): Standortserkundung Volderberg-Pfons (Tuxer Alpen) Tirol.Forstl. Bundes-Versuchsanst. 14: 1–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jirásek J. (1996): Společenstva přirozených smrčin České republiky (Natural spruce forest communities in the Czech Republic).Preslia 67 (1995): 225–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent M. &Ballard J. (1988): Trends and problems in the application of classification and ordination methods in plant ecology.Vegetatio 78: 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilian W., Müller F. &Starlinger F. (1994): Die forstlichen Wuchsgebiete Österreichs. Eine Naturraumgliederung nach waldökologischen Gesichtspunkten.FBVA-Berichte 82: 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuoch R. (1954): Wälder der Schweizer Alpen im Verbreitungsgebiet der Weißtanne.Mitt. Schweiz. Anst. Forstl. Versuchswesen 30: 133–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer H. (1963):Tannenreiche Wälder am Nordabfall der mittleren Ostalpen. BLV Verlagsgesellschaft, München, Basel, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer H. (1974):Wälder des Ostalpenraums. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberdorfer E. (1957):Süddeutsche Pflanzengesellschaften. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberdorfer E. (ed.) (1992):Süddeutsche Pflanzengesellschaften. Teil IV. Wälder und Gebüsche. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, Stuttgart, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olano J.M., Loidi J., Ander G. &Escudero A. (1998): Relating variation in the understorey of beech forests to ecological factors.Folia Geobot. 33: 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak C.J.F. &Gremmen N.J.M. (1987): Ecological amplitudes of plant species and the internal consistency of Ellenberg’s indicator values for moisture.Vegetatio 69: 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak C.J.F. &Šmilauer P. (1998):CANOCO reference manual and user’s guide to Canoco for Windows. Software for canonical community ordination (version 4). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichý L. (2002): JUICE, software for vegetation classification.J. Veg. Sci. 13: 451–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walentowski H. (1998): Die Weißtannen-Waldgesellschaften Bayerns.Diss. Bot. 291: 1–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallnöfer S. (1993):Vaccinio-Piceetea. In:Mucina L., Grabherr G. &Wallnöfer S. (eds.),Die Pflanzengesellschaften Österreichs, Teil III, Wälder und Gebüsche, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, Stuttgart, New York, pp. 283–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber H.E., Moravec J. &Theurillat J.-P. (2000): International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. 3rd edition.J. Veg. Sci. 11: 739–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willner W. (2001): Assoziationsbegriff und Charakterarten im Zeitalter der numerischen Klassifikation.Ber. Reinhold-Tüxen-Ges. 13: 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlgemuth T., Schütz M., Keller W. &Wildi O. (1999): Errechnete Ökogramme für Schweizer Wälder.Bot. Helv. 109: 169–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukrigl K. (1973): Montane und subalpine Waldgesellschaften am Alpenostrand.Mitt. Forstl. Bundes-Versuchsanst. 101: 1–387.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Exner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Exner, A., Willner, W. & Grabherr, G. Picea abies andAbies alba forests of the austrian alps: Numerical classification and ordination. Folia Geobot 37, 383–402 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803254

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803254

Keywords

Nomenclature

Navigation