Skip to main content
Log in

Detecting hybridization in mixed populations ofRhinanthus minor andRhinanthus angustifolius

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rhinanthus minor andRhinanthus angustifolius are known to hybridize in mixed populations in nature. These hybridization events can have important evolutionary consequences. The development and use of species-specific RAPD and ISSR markers allowed the detection of hybrid individuals not always distinguishable with morphological characters. Two mixed populations of different ages were studied. In a young mixed 2-year-old population, both individuals of the two parental species and F1 hybrids were found using genetic analysis, showing that hybridization occurred rapidly. Flower morphology of F1 hybrids was too variable to distinguish all these hybrids from the parental species. This morphological variability of F1 hybrids was also confirmed in artificial crosses in the greenhouse. In an old and no longer mixed 30-year-old population, onlyR. angustifolius plants and a few genetically introgressed individuals close toR. angustifolius were present. Genetic markers showed traces of past hybridization and introgression. Unidirectional introgression ofR. minor intoR. angustifolius with the complete disappearance ofR. minor from this population was observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold M.L. Buckner C.M. &Robinson J.J. (1991): Pollen-mediated introgression and hybrid speciation in Louisiana irises.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 1398–1402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold M.L. (1997):Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awasthi A.K., Nagaraja G.M., Naik G.V., Kanginakudru S., Thangavelu K. &Nagaraju J. (2004): Genetic diversity and relationships in mulberry (genusMorus) as revealed by RAPD and ISSR marker assays.BMC Genetics 5: 1 (Jan 10 2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bacilieri R., Ducousso A., Petit R.J. &Kremer A. (1996): Mating system and asymmetric hybridization in a mixed stand of European oaks.Evolution 50: 900–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucci G., Anzidei M., Madaghiele A. &Vendramin G.G. (1998): Detection of haplotypic variation and natural hybridization inHalepensis-complex pine species using chloroplast single sequence repeat (SSR) markers.Molec. Ecol. 7: 1633–1643.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campion-Bourget F. (1980): L’hybridation interspécifique expérimentale chez cinq principales especes deRhinanthus L. de France.Rev. Cytol. Biol. Vég. Botaniste 3: 221–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraway V., Carr G.D. &Morden C.W. (2001): Assessment of hybridization and introgression in lava-colonizing hawaiianDubautia (Asteraceae: Madiinae) using RAPD markers.Amer. J. Bot. 88: 1688–1694.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carney S.H., Gardner K.A. &Rieseberg L.H. (2000): Evolutionary changes over the fifty-year history of a hybrid population of sunflowers (Helianthus).Evolution 54: 462–474.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chabert A. (1899): Etude sur le genreRhinanthus.Bull. Herb. Boissier 7: 512–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle J.J. &Doyle J.L. (1990): Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue.Focus 12: 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floate K.D. (2004): Extent and patterns of hybridization among the three species ofPopulus that constitute the riparian forest of southern Alberta, Canada.Canad. J. Bot. 82: 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Rodriguez A., Arias D.M., Valencia S. &Oyama K. (2004): Morphological and RAPD analysis of hybridization betweenQuercus affinis andQ. laurina (Fagaceae), two Mexican red oaks.Amer. J. Bot. 91: 401–409.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ho K.Y., Yang J.C. &Hsiao J.Y. (2002): An assessment of genetic diversity and documentation of hybridization ofCasuarina grown in Taiwan using RAPD markers.Int. J. Pl. Sci. 163: 831–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keim P., Paige K.N., Whitham T.G. &Lark K.G. (1989): Genetic analysis of an interspecific hybrid swarm ofPopulus: occurrence of unidirectional introgression.Genetics 123: 557–565.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuehn M.M., Minor J.E. &White B.N. (1999): An examination of hybridization between the cattail speciesTypha latifolia andTypha angustifolia using random amplified polymorphic DNA and chloroplast DNA markers.Molec. Ecol. 8: 1981–1990.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak M.M. (1978): Pollination, hybridization and ethological isolation ofRhinanthus minor andR. serotinus (Rhinanthoideae: Scrophulariaceae) by bumblebees (Bombus Latr.).Taxon 27: 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak M.M. (1979a): Effects of bumblebee visits on the seed set ofPedicularis, Rhinanthus andMelampyrum (Scrophulariaceae) in the Netherlands.Acta Bot. Neerl. 28: 177–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak M.M. (1979b): Maintenance of species integrity in sympatrically occuringRhinanthus minor andR. serotinus in the Netherlands.Oecologia 41: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak M.M. (1980): Artificial and natural hybridization and introgression inRhinanthus (Scrophulariaceae) in relation to bumblebee pollination.Taxon 29: 613–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak M.M. (1986): Bumblebees and constancy.Acta Bot. Neerl. 35: 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak M.M., Holthuijzen Y.A. &Prins H.H.Th. (1985): A comparison of nectar characteristics of the bumblebee-pollinatedRhinanthus minor andR. serotinus.Oikos 44: 123–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambinon J., Delvosalle L. &Duvigneaud J. (2004):Flore de la Belgique, du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, du Nord de la France et des régions voisines (Ptéridophytes et Spermatophytes). Ed. 5. Edition du patrimoine du Jardin botanique national de Belgique, Meise.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins M., Tenreiro R. &Oliveira M.M. (2003): Genetic relatedness of Portuguese almond cultivars assessed by RAPD and ISSR markers.Pl. Cell Rep. 22: 71–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nason J.D., Ellstrand N.C. &Arnold M.L. (1992): Patterns of hybridization and introgression in populations of oaks, manzanitas, and irises.Amer. J. Bot. 79: 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead R.G., DePamphilis C.W., Wolfe A.D., Young N.D., Elisons W.J. &Reeves P.A. (2001): Distintegration of theScrophulariaceae.Amer. J. Bot. 88: 348–361.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker C. &Riches C.R. (1993):Parasitic weeds of the world. CAB international, Wallingford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perron M. &Bousquet J. (1997): Natural hybridization between black spruce and red spruce.Molec. Ecol. 6: 725–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pharmawati M., Yan G. &McFarlane I.J. (2004): Application of RAPD and ISSR markers to analyse molecular relationships inGrevillea (Proteaceae).Austral. Syst. Bot. 17: 49–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rhymer J.M. &Simberloff D. (1996): Extinction by hybridization and introgression.Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 83–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieseberg L.H. &Ellstrand N.C. (1993): What can molecular and morphological markers tell us about plant hybridization?Crit. Rev. Pl. Sci. 12: 213–241.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rieseberg L.H. &Wendel J.F. (1993): Introgression and its consequences in plants. In:Harrison R.G. (eds.),Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 70–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sale M.M., Protts B.M., West A.K. &Rid J.B. (1996): Molecular differentiation within and betweenEucalyptus risdonii, E. amygdalina and their hybrids using RAPD markers.Austral. J. Bot. 44: 559–569.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sedgley M., Wirthensohn M.G. &Delaporte K.L. (1996): Interspecific hybridization betweenBanksia hookeriana Meisn. andBanksia prionotes Lindl. (Proteaceae).Int. J. Pl. Sci. 157: 638–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soó R. {Pade} &Webb D.A. (1972):Rhinanthus L. In:Tutin T.G., Heywood V.H., Burges N.A. &Valentine D.H. (eds.),Flora Europaea 3, Diapensiaceaeto Myoporaceae, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 276–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterneck J. von (1901): Monographie der gattungAlectorolophus.Abh. K. K. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien 1: 1–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Borg S.J. (1972):Variability of Rhinanthus serotinus (Schönh.)Oborny in relation to the environment. Ph.D. Thesis, Rijksuniversiteit te Groningen, Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Meijden R. (1990):Heukels’ Flora van Nederland. Ed. 21. Wolters-Noordhoof, Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Hulst R., Shipley B. &Thériault A. (1987): Why isRhinanthus minor (Scrophulariaceae) such a good invader?Canad. J. Bot. 65: 2373–2379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams J.G.K., Kubelik A.R., Livak K.J., Rafalski A. &Tingey S.V. (1990): DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers.Nucl. Acids Res. 18: 6531–6535.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young N.D., Steiner K.E. &DePamphilis C.W. (1999): The evolution of parasitism inScrophulariaceae/Orobanchaceae: plastid gene sequences refute an evolutionary transition series.Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 86: 876–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zietkiwicz E., Rafalski A. &Labuda D. (1994): Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain-reaction amplification.Genomics 20: 176–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ducarme, V., Wesselingh, R.A. Detecting hybridization in mixed populations ofRhinanthus minor andRhinanthus angustifolius . Folia Geobot 40, 151–161 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803231

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803231

Keywords

Navigation