Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term demographic variation in range-margin populations ofGypsophila fastigiata

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Disjunct populations of the perennial herbGypsophila fastigiata L. (Caryophyllaceae) on the Baltic island of Öland were monitored during a thirteen-year study. The main objectives were to analyze the dynamic features ofG. fastigiata within and among sub-populations in shorter and longer time perspectives, and to relate this to habitat characteristics and patterns in local weather variation. The total number of individuals decreased and the proportion of reproductive individuals increased throughout the study period. Recruitment and mortality on a fine spatial scale (0.25 m2) were negatively correlated to species richness and vegetation cover. Rapid changes in population sizes were observed during and after summers with low precipitation. The highest mortality rates were found in pre-reproductive stages whereas relatively many of the adult plants survived the droughts. The long-term trend of population decline inG. fastigiata could be a result of changes in vegetation structure due to changing grazing regimes. It might also be an effect of more frequent dry summers during the second half of the observation period or of an interaction between weather and changes in management. Another interpretation is that dynamic processes are taking place on a geographic scale not covered in the present study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albertson N. (1950): Das grosse südliche Alvar der Insel Öland.Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 44: 269–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz F.A. (1984): Demographic consequences of plant physiological traits: some case studies. In:Dirzo R. &Sarukhán J. (eds.),Perspectives on plant population ecology, Sinauer, Sunderland, pp. 324–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell G., Lechowicz M.L. &Schoen D.J. (1991): The ecology and genetics of fitness in forest plants. III. Environmental variance in natural populations ofImpatiens pallida.J. Ecol. 79: 697–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson K. (1993):Fumana procumbens on Öland: population dynamics of a disjunct species at the northern limits of its range.J. Ecol. 81: 745–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson K., Prentice H.C., Rosén E., Moberg R. &Sjörgren E. (1988): The dry alvar grasslands of Öland: ecological amplitudes of plant species in relation to vegetation composition.Acta Phytogeogr. Suec. 76: 21–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brussard P.F. (1984): Geographic patterns and environmental gradients: the central-marginal model inDrosophila revisited.Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 25–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullard E.R., Shearer H.D.H., Day J.D. &Crawford R.M.M. (1987): Survival and flowering ofPrimula scotica Hook.J. Ecol. 75: 589–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgman M.A., Ferson S. &Akçakaya H.R. (1993):Risk assessment in conservation biology. Population and community biology series 12, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson H.L. &Templeton A.R. (1984): Genetic revolutions in relation to speciation phenomena: the founding of new populations.Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 97–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter R.N. &Prince S.D. (1987): Distribution limits from a demographic point of view. In:Davy A.J., Hutchings M.J. &Watkinson A.R. (eds.),Plant population ecology, The 28th Symposium of the British Ecological Society, Sussex 1987, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 165–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler C.R. (1995): Practical considerations in the use of simultaneous inference in multiple tests.Anim. Behav. 49: 524–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnett N.P., Willis A.J., Hunt R. &Grime J.P. (1998): A 38-year study of relations between weather and vegetation dynamics in road verges near Bibury, Gloucestershire.J. Ecol. 86:610–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dytham C. (1999):Choosing and using statistics: A biologists guide. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson B. (1982):Data concerning the air temperature climate in Sweden. Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Report No. 39, Norrköping.

  • Falińska K. (1997): Life history variation inCirsium palustre and its consequences for the population demography in vegetation succession.Acta Soc. Bot. Poloniae 66: 207–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler J. &Cohen L. (1990):Practical statistics for field biology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston K.J. (1991): How large is a species range?Oikos 61: 434–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsinger K.E. &Gottlieb L.D. (1991): Conservation of rare and endangered plants: principles and prospects. In:Falk D.A. &Holsinger K.E. (eds.),Genetics and conservation of rare plants, Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford, pp. 195–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultén E. (1971):Atlas över Växternas Utbredning i Norden (Atlas of distribution of plants in the Nordic countries). Ed. 2. Generalstabens Litografiska Anstalts Förlag, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntley B. &Birks H.J.B. (1983):An atlas of past and present pollen maps for Europe: 0–13000 years ago. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings M.J. (1987): The population biology of the early spider orchid,Ophrys sphegodes Mill. I. A demographic study from 1975–1984.J. Ecol. 75: 711–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inghe O. &Tamm C.O. (1985): Survival and flowering of perennial herbs. IV. The behaviour ofHepatica nobilis andSanicula europaea on permanent plots during 1943–1981.Oikos 45: 400–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalas J. &Suominen J. (1986):Atlas florae europaeae 7, Caryophyllaceae (Silenoideae). The Committee for the Mapping of the Flora of Europe & Societas Biologica Fennica, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly D. (1989): Demography of short-lived plants in chalk grassland. I. Life cycle variation in annuals and strict biennials.J. Ecol. 77: 747–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J.M. &Hamrick J.L. (1983): Demography of two natural populations of Musk thistle (Carduus nutans).J. Ecol. 71: 923–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lönn M., Prentice H.C. &Bengtsson K. (1996): Genetic structure, allozyme-habitat associations and reproductive fitness inGypsophila fastigiata (Caryophyllaceae).Oecologia 106: 308–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack R.N. &Pyke D.A. (1983): The demography ofBromus tectorum: variation in time and space.J. Ecol. 71: 69–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall J. (1968): Factors limiting the survival ofCorynephorus canescens (L.)Beauv. in Great Britain at the northern edge of its distribution.Oikos 19: 206–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matlack G.R. (1987): Comparative demographies of four adjacent populations ofSilene dioica (Caryophyllaceae).J. Ecol. 75: 113–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novotný V. (1991): Effect of habitat persistence on the relationship between geographic distribution and local abundance.Oikos 61: 431–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons P.A. (1983):The evolutionary biology of colonizing species. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigott C.D. &Walters S.M. (1954): On the interpretation of the discontinuous distributions shown by certain British species of open habitats.J. Ecol. 42: 95–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz D. (1981): Seven forms of rarity. In:Synge H. (ed.),The biological aspects of rare plant conservation, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, pp. 205–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice W.R. (1989): Analyzing tables of statistical tests.Evolution 43: 223–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roff D.A. (1992):The evolution of life histories. Theory and analysis. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosén E. (1982): Vegetation development and sheep grazing in limestone grasslands of South Öland, Sweden.Acta Phytogeogr. Suec. 72: 1–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosén E. (1985): Succession and fluctuations in species composition in the limestone grasslands of south Öland.Münstersche Geogr. Arbeiten 20: 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosén E. (1988): Development and seedling establishment within aJuniperus communis stand on Öland, Sweden.Acta Bot. Neerl. 37: 193–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosén E. (1995): Periodic droughts and long-term dynamics of Alvar grassland vegetation on Öland, Sweden.Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 30: 131–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosén E. &Borgegård S.-O. (1999): The open cultural landscape. In:Rydin H., Snoeijs P. & Diekmann M. (eds.), Swedish plant geography,Acta Phytogeogr. Suec. 84: 113–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusch G. (1993): The role of regeneration by seed in the dynamics of limestone grassland communities.Acta Univ. Upsal. (Compreh. Summ. Uppsala Diss. Fac. Sci.) 427: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusch G. &Fernández-Palacios J.M. (1995): The influence of spatial heterogeneity on regeneration by seed in a limestone grassland.J. Veg. Sci. 6: 417–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silander J.A. Jr. (1983): Demographic variation in the Australian desert cassia under grazing pressure.Oecologia 60: 227–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown J.W. (1981): Micro-spatial heterogeneity and seedling demography in species-rich grassland.New Phytol. 88: 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown J.W. &Dickie J.B. (1981): Seedling survivorship in natural populations of nine perennial chalk grassland plants.New Phytol. 88: 555–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjögren E. 1964: Epilitische und epigäische Moosvegetation in Laubwäldern der Insel Öland (Schweden).Acta Phytogeogr. Suec. 48: 1–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skre O. (1979): The regional distribution of vascular plants in Scandinavia with requirements for high summer temperatures.Norweg J. Bot. 26: 295–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinhauser F. (1970):Climatic atlas of Europe. WMO & UNESCO, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterner R. (1938): Flora der Insel Öland.Acta Phytogeogr. Suec. 9: 1–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson B.M., Carlsson B.Å, Karlsson P.S. &Nordell K.O. (1993): Comparative long-term demography of three species ofPinguicula.J. Ecol. 81: 635–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symonides E. (1979): The structure and population dynamics of psammophyte communities on inland dunes. I. Populations of initial stages.Ekol. Polska 27: 3–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Maarel E. (1988): Floristic diversity and guild structure in the grasslands of Ölands Stora Alvar.Acta Phytogeogr. Suec. 76: 53–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorontzova L.I. &Zaugolnova L.B. (1985): Population biology of steppe plants. In:White J. (ed.),The population structure of vegetation, Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 143–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkinson A.R. (1990): The population dynamics ofVulpia fasciculata: a nine-year study.J. Ecol. 78: 196–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller S.G. (1985): The life history ofLithospermum caroliense, a long-lived herbaceous sand dune species.Ecol. Monogr. 55.

  • Wells T.C. (1981): Population ecology of terrestrial orchids. In:Synge H. (ed.),The biological aspects of rare plant conservation, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, pp. 281–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams O.B. (1970): Population dynamics of two perennial grasses in Australian semi-arid grassland.J. Ecol. 58: 869–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward F.I. (1997): Life at edge: a 14-year study of aVerbena officinalis population’s interactions with climate.J. Ecol. 85: 899–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bengtsson, K. Long-term demographic variation in range-margin populations ofGypsophila fastigiata . Folia Geobot 35, 143–160 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803093

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803093

Keywords

Navigation