Advertisement

Journal of Coastal Conservation

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 113–124 | Cite as

On the integrated modelling of coastal changes

  • Capobianco Michele
Special Features in Coastal Conservation 4

Abstract

This paper introduces a possible approach to integrated modelling of coastal change, focusing on coastal land use and cover change. Some of the mostimportant open issues in the context of integrated modelling of coastal change are introduced. The paper focuses on methdological aspects. Specific reference is made to Physiographic Unit Modelling as an approach to better handle spatial variability and ‘morphogenesis’, and as a way to focus on coastal change mechanisms instead of absolute coastal dynamics for achieving an important simplification of the problem. The application is briefly discussed with reference to a ‘minimal model’. The methodological structure introduced is considered particularly suitable to represent, according to a variable degree of simplification, the integrative dynamics between resources and uses of the resources.

Keywords

Coastal zone Land use Management Morphogenesis Spatial dynamics 

Abbreviations

CLUCC

Coastal Land Use and Cover Change

ICM

Integrated Coastal Management

ICZM

Integrated Coastal Zone Management

RSLR

Relative Sea Level Rise

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Capobianco, M. & Otter, H. 1996.Modelling land use and land cover changes for deltaic areas. International workshop on the state-of-the-art of ICZM in the Mediterranean and the Black Sea. Iberotel Sarigerme Park.Google Scholar
  2. Capobianco, M., DeVriend, H.J., Nicholls, R. & Stive, M.J.F. 1999. Coastal area impact and vulnerability assessment: A morphodynamic modeller's point of view.J. Coastal Res. 53: 701–716.Google Scholar
  3. Capobianco, M., Jimenez, J.A., Sanchez-Arcilla, A. & Stive, M.J.F. 1997. Budget models for the evolution of deltas. Definition of processes and scales.J. Coastal Conserv. 4: 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Costanza, R., Sklar, f.H. & White, M.L. 1990. Modelling coastal landscape dynamics.BioScience 40: 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Engelen, G., White, R. & Uljee, I. 1993. Exploratory modelling of socio-economic impacts of climatic change. In: Maul, G.A. (ed.)Climate change in the intra-americas sea, pp. 306–324. Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  6. Engelen, G., White, R., Uljee, I. & Drazan, P. 1995. Using cellular automata for integrated modelling of socio-environmental systems.Environ. Monit. Assessm. 34: 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Farinha, J.C., Costa, L., Zalidis, G., Matzavelas, A., Fitoka, E., Hecher, N. & Tomàs Vives, P. 1996.Mediterranean wetland inventory: habitat description system. MedWet/ICN/Wetlands International/Greek Biotope/Wetland Centre (EKBY)/Instituto da Conservaçao de Naturaleza (ICN) Publication, Vol. 3, Athens.Google Scholar
  8. Gardner, M. 1970. The fantastic combinations of John Conways new solitaire game Life.Sci. Am. 223: 120–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gutowitz, H. 1991.Cellular automata. Theory and experiment. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MS.Google Scholar
  10. Meyer, W.B. & Turner II, B.L. (eds.) 1994.Changes in land use and land cover: A global perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  11. Turner II, B.L., Skole, D., Sanderson, S., Fischer, G., Fresco, L. & Leemans, R. 1995.Land-use and land-cover change science/research plan. IGBP Report No. 35 and HDP Report No. 7. ICSU, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  12. Turner, R.K. 1991. Economics and wetland management.Ambio 20: 59–63.Google Scholar
  13. White, R. & Engelen, G. 1993. Cellular automata and fractal urban form: A cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land use patterns.Environ. Plann. 25: 1175–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EUCC; Opulus Press Uppsala 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Capobianco Michele
    • 1
  1. 1.Tecnomare S.p.A, R&D, EnvironmentVeneziaItaly

Personalised recommendations