, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 319–323 | Cite as

Depriving neonatal rats of milk from early lactation has long-term consequences on mammotrope development

  • Kevin D. Nusser
  • Stephen Frawley
Original Articles


The sudden appearance of prolactin-releasing cells during the early postnatal period of the rat is initiated by a small milk-borne peptide. Depriving newborn rats of this early milk factor severely retards mammotrope differentiation during the neonatal period. In the present work, we extend our study of early milk deprivation to the adult. To this end, newborn litters were crossfostered onto mothers that had given birth the same day or one week earlier in order to deprive pups in the latter group of early milk. At 5, 15, and 30 d of age, rats deprived of such milk had decreased percentages of mammotropes (as measured by reverse hemolytic plaque assay, RHPA) when compared to nondeprived animals (P<0.05). By 45 d, the percentage of mammotropes was similar for the two crossfostered groups (P>0.1) and this persisted through d 60. Subsequently, we assessed the secretory capacity of mammotropes from 60-d old rats to secretagogues and found that early milk deprivation had no effect on basal prolactin release (P>0.1), but that it augmented hormone secretion evoked by thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH, 100 nM; P<0.01). The inhibitory response to dopamine (DA; 1 μM) and the stimulatory response to angiotensin II (AGII; 100 nM) were not altered by early milk deprivation (P>0.1). Taken together, these results demonstrate that factors in milk from early lactation are required for normal mammotrope differentiation, and that the delay induced by early milk deprivation leads to altered secretory function of mammotropes in adult animals.

Key Words

Prolactin anterior pituitary neonate differentiation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hoeffler J. P., Boockfor F. R., and Frawley L. S. (1985).Endocrinology 117, 187–195.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Porter T. E., Chapman L. E., Van Dolah F. M., and Frawley, L. S. (1991).Endocrinology 128, 792–796.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Porter T. E., and Frawley L. S. (1991).Endocrinology 129, 2707–2713.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Porter T. E., Wiles, C. D., and Frawley, L. S. (1993).Endocrinology 133, 1284–1291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carbajo-Pérez E., and Watanabe Y. G. (1990).Cell Tissue Res. 261, 333–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shyr S. W., Crowley W. R., and Grovesnor C. E. (1986).Endocrinology 119, 1217–1221.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shah G. V., Shyr S. W., Grovesnor, C. E., and Crowley, W. R. (1988).Endocrinology 122, 1883–1889.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Skwarlo-Sonta K. (1992).Immunol. Lett.,33, 105–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kooijman, R., Hooghe-Peters, E. L., and Hooghe, R. (1996).Adv. Immunol.,63, 377–454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bartke, A. (1980).Fed. Proc. 39, 2577–2581.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bartke, A. (1965).J. Reprod. Fertil. 10, 93–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gala, R. R. (1995).Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. Med. 210, 117–125.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huhtaniemi, I. T., and Catt, K. J. (1981).Endocrinology 109, 483–490.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Russell D. H., Mills, K. T., Talamantes, F. J., and Bern, H. A. (1988).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 7404–7407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carlos, C. P., Lemonica, I. P., Kempinas, W. G., and Pereira, O. C. M. (1996),Physiol. Behav. 59, 147–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Negro-Vilar, A., Saad, W. A., and McCann, S. M. (1977).Endocinology 100, 729–737.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boockfor, F. R., Hoeffler, J. P., and Frawley, L. S. (1986).Neuroendocrinology 42, 64–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cell Biology and AnatomyMedical University of South CarolinaCharleston

Personalised recommendations