Advertisement

ECLA, prebisch, and the problem of latin american development

  • Ramón Ramírez Gómez
Article

Keywords

Foreign Investment Latin American Country Comparative International Development Private Initiative Economic Planning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Preliminary note of the report, published in a supplement ofComercio Exterior, a publication of theBanco National de Comercio Exterior, S.A., Mexico, D.F., April 1963, p. 1.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Supplement ofComercio Exterior, op. cit., p. 8.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Supplement ofComercio Exterior, op. cit., p. 25.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Supplement ofComercio Exterior, op. cit., p. 24.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    John MaynardKeynes,Teoría General de la Ocupación, el Interés y el Dinero. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1943, p. 364.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Supplement ofComercio Exterior, op. cit., p. 18.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Supplement ofComercio Exterior, op. cit., p. 19.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    GunnarMyrdal,Teoría Económica y Regiones Subdesarrolladas. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1959, pp. 95–6.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Supplement ofComercio Exterior, op. cit., p. 23.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M.Rosental and P. Iudin,Diccionario Filosófico Abreviado. Montevideo: Ediciones Pueblos Unidos, 1959, p. 439.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Charles Bettelheim, in the preface of his book,Problemas Teóricos y Prácticos de la Planificatión, likewise says that “planning is only possible if the economic contradictions deriving from the private ownership of the means of production are eliminated and replaced by social property.” Madrid: Editorial Tecnos, 1962, p. 19. Finally, Eugene Varga, a prominent Hungarian economist, affirms that “a society can only plan the economy if the means of production, or in the extreme case their most decisive part, are socialist property.”Cuba Socialista, No. 8, April 1962, Havana, p. 95.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    This has been affirmed, among others, by P. A. Baran, Charles Bettelheim, and Eugene Varga. The first writes “that it is impossible to effect any planning deserving of that name, in a society in which the means of production remain under the control of private interests which manage them with the purpose of achieving maximum profits (or guarantees or other particular advantages) for their owners.”El Trimestre Económico, No. 115, July-September 1962, Mexico, D.F., p. 453.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Supplement ofComercio Exterior, op. cit., p. 29.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    AlbertoBaltra,Crecimiento Económico de América Latina. Santiago de Chile: Editorial del Pacífico, S.A., 1961, p. 105.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Op. cit., p.110.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Supplementof Comercio Exterior, op. cit., p. 34.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Político Monetaria en Poíses Subdesarrollados, Centro de Estudios Monetarios Latinoamericanos, Mexico, D.F., 1955, p. 92.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Monthly Economic Letter, July 1963, a publication of the First National City Bank of New York.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boletin Económico de América Latina, Vol. VI, Statistical Supplement. Santiago de Chile: United Nations, Economic Committee for Latin America, November 1961, p. 46.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    N. Kaldor, “Inflation and Growth in Latin America,” Conference held at Rio de Janeiro on January 3–11, 1963.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ramón Ramírez Gómez
    • 1
  1. 1.National University of mexicoMexico

Personalised recommendations