Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Unihorses and the ontological argument

  • Published:
Sophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Footnote

  1. J. Kellenberger, “The Ontological Principle and God's Existence”,Philosophy, 45 (1970), p. 282.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Kellenberger, (op. cit.) “. who states this objection very clearly. The objection is employed by Jerome Shaffer (“Existence, Predication, and the Ontological Argument”,Mind LXXI (1962)), by Terence Penelhum (“Descartes' Ontological Argument”,Fact and Existence, ed. by J. Margolis, Oxford, Blackwell, 1960), and others. It can be traced to Caterus. (See first set of objections to Descartes'Meditations.)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cf. Anthony Kenny, (op. cit.) “.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anthony Kenny, (Ibid.) “. Robert Adams, “The Logical Structure of Anselm's Arguments”,The Philosophical Review, LXXX (1971).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

    William J. Wainwright

Authors
  1. William J. Wainwright
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wainwright, W.J. Unihorses and the ontological argument. SOPH 17, 27–32 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02798116

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02798116

Keywords

Search

Navigation