Advertisement

Sophia

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 2–16 | Cite as

Conceptual relativism and the possibility of absolute faith

  • Houston A. Craighead
Article
  • 16 Downloads

Keywords

Conceptual Schema Religious Faith Ontological Argument Cognitive Relativism Pluralist Ontology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Joseph Runzo,Reason, Relativism and God, New York: St. Martin's Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Runzo, pp. 12–13 and 60.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Runzo, chs. 3, 5, and 6.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thomas Kuhn,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962; Paul Feyerabend, “Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism,” inMinnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Herbert Feigl and Grover Maxwell (eds.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1962; Michael Polanyi,Personal Knowledge: Toward a Post-Critical Philosophy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958. In regard to Polanyi, see especially William H. Potent,Polanyian Meditations: In Search of a Post-Critical Logic, Durham, NC: Duke University Press 1985.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Runzo esp. pp. 38–41.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Runzo p. 40.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Runzo ch. 7.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Runzo pp. 223–224.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Runzo p. 201.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Runzo p. 264.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Runzo, pp. 223–224.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Runzo, pp. 204–225. My account there is drastically shortened. However, I believe I have captured the essence of Runzo's view.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jean-Paul Sartre,Being and Nothingness, New York: Philosophical Library, 1956, pp. 47–70.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Runzo, ch. 6.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Charles Hartshorne,The Logic of Perfection and Other Essays in Neo-Classical Metaphysics, LaSalle; Open Court, 1962. See especially p. 50.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Norman Malcolm, “Anselm's Ontological Arguments,”Philosophical Review, (1956), pp. 47–70.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alvin Plantinga,The Nature of Necessity, London: Oxford University Press, 1974, pp. 196–221.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schubert Ogden, “The Reality of God,” inThe Reality of God and Other Essays, New York: Harper and Row, 1966, pp. 1–70.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stephen Toulmin,An Examination of the Place of Reason in Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ogden, p. 31. The notion of “boundary situation” has been used in a similar way by any number of thinkers. See, for example, Karl Jaspers,Philosophy, vol. 2, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1970, pp. 177–222; also David Tracy,Blessed Rage for Order, New York: Seabury Press, 1975, pp. 92–118.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    Ogden, pp. 33–34.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ogden, p. 38.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
    Ogden himself argues for a “process” view based on the writings of Charles Hartshorne. See Ogden, pp. 44–70. He also contends that such a view is at least implicit in Heidegger. See “The Temporality of God,” pp. 164–173 in Ogden.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ogden, p. 38.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ogden, p. 39.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ogden, pp. 40–41.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ogden, p. 42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer SBM B.V. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Houston A. Craighead
    • 1
  1. 1.Winthrop CollegeU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations