Skip to main content
Log in

ADEPT and related concepts

  • Published:
Cell Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Antibody-based therapy has attracted interest because of its potential to improve selectivity. But the limitations of antibodies as delivery systems are well known and the objective of restricting action to tumor sites requires additional means. The ADEPT concept introduced two components, enzyme and prodrug, that have the advantage that they can be secondarily manipulated to augment the selectivity of the primary delivery systems.

An antibody-enzyme conjugate (AEC) is no more selective as a delivery system than antibody itself and total catalytic capacity in tumor, plasma, and nontumor tissues is a function not only of concentration but also of volume. It is pointless giving a prodrug that is promptly activated by enzyme in blood. The ability to inactivate or clear plasma enzyme (PENCIL) by an antibody directed at its active site and modified to have low potential to penetrate the tumor is one of several ways of improving partition of enzyme between tumor and nontumor.

A second opportunity for manipulation arises from structural differences between prodrug and active drug and the potential of enzymes to exploit that difference. However effective the enzyme delivery system, some leakage of active drug into plasma is likely and active drug access to hemopoietic tissues is dose limiting. An enzyme for which the active drug, but not the prodrug, is substrate, and which is conjugated to a macromolecule, is proposed. Some thymidylate synthetase inhibitors suggest themselves as ready agents for use in this intravascular inactivation of active drug (IVIAD). This approach is an alternative to inactivation of plasma enzyme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bagshawe, K. D. (1987)Br. J. Cancer 56, 531–532.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bagshawe, K. D., Springer, C. J., Searle, F., Antoniw, P., Sharma, S. K., Melton, R. G., et al. (1988)Br. J. Cancer 58, 700–703.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bagshawe, K. D. (1989)Br. J. Cancer 60, 275–281.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Senter, P. D., Saulnier, M. G., Schreiber, G. J., Hirschberg, D. L., Brown, J. P., Hellstrom, I., et al. (1988)Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 4842–4846.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sharma, S. K., Bagshawe, K. D., Burke, P. J., Boden, R. W., and Rogers, G. T. (1990)Br. J. Cancer 61, 659–662.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sharma, S. K., Bagshawe, K. D., Searle, F., Melton, R. G., Rogers, G. T., Boden, J. A., et al. (1991)Disease Markers 9, 225–231.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharma, S. K., Bagshawe, K. D., Burke, P. J., Boden, J. A., Rogers, G. T., Springer, C. J., et al. (1993)Cancer in press.

  8. Huennekins, F. M., Kuefner, U., Esswein, A., Fan, J., Montejano, Y., and Vitols, K. S. (1990)Chemistry and Biology of Pteridines, Walter de Gruyter, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sherwood, R. F., Melton, R. G., Alwan, S. M., and Hughes, P. (1985)Eur. J. Biochem. 148, 447–453.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Philpott, G. W., Bower, R. J., and Parker, C. W. (1973)Surgery 74, 51–58.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bertino, J. R., O'Brien, P., and McCullough, J. L. (1971)Science 172, 161–172.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bagshawe, K.D. ADEPT and related concepts. Cell Biophysics 24, 83–91 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02789218

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02789218

Keywords

Navigation