The metabolic significance of Se in plants is not well documented, though the presence of many selenoenzymes in bacteria and the essentiality of Se in higher animals is established. Since germination is an active process in plant growth and metabolism, the effect of Se was investigated in germinatingVigna radiata L, a nonaccumulating Sedeficient legume. Growth and protein were enhanced in seedlings supplemented with selenium (Se) as sodium selenite in the medium up to 1 μg/mL. The pattern of uptake of75Se in the differentiating tissues and the subcellular distribution were investigated. The percentage of incorporation of75Se was greater in the mitochondria at the lowest level (0.5 μg/mL) of Se supplementation compared to higher levels of Se exposure. Proteins precipitated from the postmitochondrial supernatant fractions, when separated by means of polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), indicated a major selenoprotein in the seedlings germinated at 2.0 μg/mL Se. In seedlings grown with supplemented Se, enhanced respiratory control ratio and succinate dehydrogenase activity were observed in the mitochondria of tissues, indicative of a role for Se in mitochondrial membrane functions.
Selenium, uptake during germination, in germinatingV. radiata, tissue and subcellular distribution, mitochondrial oxidations Plant mitochondria,V. radiata, germination,75Se uptake, oxygen uptake, succinate dehydrogenase
5-5’-dithio-bis (2-nitrobenzoic acid)
respiratory control ratio
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
J. W. Anderson and A. R. Scarf, inMetals and Micronutrients: Uptake and Utilization by Plants, D. A. Robb and W. S. Pierpoint, eds., Academic, New York, 1983, pp. 242–275.Google Scholar
R. L. Mikkelsen, A. L. Page, and F. T. Bingham, inFactors Affecting Se Accumulation by Agricultural Crops. SSSA Spec Publ,23 (Selenium Agric. Environ.), 1989, pp. 65–94 (CA Abs No. 133116z, Vol 111, 1989).Google Scholar
G. S. Banuelos, G. E. Cardon, C. J. Phene, L. Wu, S. Akohoue, and S. Zambrzuski,Plant Soil148, 253 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Y. Hatefi, inMethods in Enzymology, vol. 53, S. Fleischer and L. Packer, eds., Academic, New York, 1978, pp. 27–35.Google Scholar
W. D. Bonner Jr., inMethods in Enzymology, vol. 1, S. P. Kolowick and N. O. Kaplan, eds., Academic, New York, 1955, pp. 722–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
P. A. Altman and D. S. Dittmer, inBiology Data Book, 2nd ed., vol. 1, 1972, pp. 399–412.Google Scholar
K. Easwari and K. Lalitha, inAdvances in Plant Biotechnology and Biochemistry, M. L. Lodha, S. L. Mehta, S. Ramagopal, and G. P. Srivastava, eds., Indian Soc. Agril. Biochemists, Kanpur, India, pp. 143–147.Google Scholar