Summary
The case of a 91-yr-old man who had a tumor of the pancreas head successfully resected is reported. He was admitted to our hospital because of obstructive jaundice, and then percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) was performed. Cholangiography via PTBD tube showed marked stenosis of the bile duct in the head of the pancreas. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) showed obstruction of the main pancreatic duct in the head of the pancreas, and carcinoma in the head of the pancreas was diagnosed. Abdominal angiography showed stenosis of the celiac trunk caused by compression from the median arcuate ligament, but no tumor stain or encasement in the pancreas was detected. Because the patient had lived an extremely healthy life and had no serious concurrent disease before admission, laparotomy was performed. The tumor in the head of the pancreas was about 2 cm in diameter and restricted inside the pancreas. Pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PpPD) with regional lymph node dissection was performed. The tumor was 1.5 cm in its maximal diameter, and histopathologically was diagnosed as an invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas with moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and now, 3 yr after surgery, he is doing very well and leading a normal daily life.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Classification of Pancreatic Carcinoma. Japan Pancreas Society, First English Edition. Kanehara and Co., Ltd. Tokyo, 1996.
Hosking MP, Warner MA, Lobdell CM, Offord KP, Melton LJ III. Outcomes of surgery in patient 90 yr of age and older.JAMA 1989; 261: 1909–1915.
Thomas DR, Ritchie CS. Preoperative assessment of older adults.JAGS 1995; 43: 811–821.
Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Study of illness in the aged.JAMA 1963; 185: 914–919.
Forrest JF, Longmire WP. Carcinoma of the pancreas and periampullary region. A study of 279 patients.Ann Surg 1979; 189: 129–138.
Lerut JP, Giannello PR, Otte JB, Kestens PJ. Pancreaticoduodenal resection: surgical experience and evaluation of risk factors in 103 patients.Ann Surg 1984; 199: 432–437.
Alexander HR, Turnbull AD, Salamone J, Keefe D, Melendez J. Upper abdominal cancer surgery in the very elderly.J Surg Oncol 1991; 47: 82–86.
Fong YF, Blumgart LH, Fortner JG, Brennan MF. Pancreatic or liver resection for malignancy is safe and effective for the elderly.Ann Surg 1995; 222: 426–437.
Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Kaufman HS, Coleman JA. One hundred and forty-five consective pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality.Ann Surg 1993; 217: 430–438.
Delcore R, Thomas JH, Hermreck AS. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant pancreatic and periampullary neoplasmas in elderly patients.Am J Surg 1991; 162: 532–536.
Pitt HA. Pancreatic or liver resection for malignancy is safe and effective for the elderly (discussion).Ann Surg 1995; 222: 435,436.
Grace PA, Pitt HA, Longmire WP. Pylorus preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: an overview.Br J Surg 1990; 77: 968–974.
Yamamoto M, Kamigaki T, Ohashi O, Kasahara H, Usami M, Saito Y. Pancreatic cancer in the aged.The Biliary Tract and Pancreas (Tan to Sui) 1992; 13: 1085–1090 (in Japanese).
The Pancreatic Carcinoma Registration Committee of Japan Pancreas Society. The reports of national registration and research of pancreas carcinoma from 1992 to 1995 in Japan.J Jpn Panc Soc (Suizo) 1993–1996 (in Japanese).
Dunbar JD, Molnar W, Beman FF, Marable SA. Compression of the celiac trunk and abdominal angina.Am J Roent 1965; 95: 731–744.
Thompson NW, Eckhauser FE, Talpos G, Cho KJ. Pancreaticoduodenectomy and celiac occlusive disease.Ann Surg 1981; 193: 399–406.
Fortner JG, Watson RC. Median arcuate ligament obstruction of celiac axis and pancreatic cancer.Ann Surg 1981; 194: 698–700.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Okamura, K., Hayakawa, H., Kusagawa, M. et al. Treatment of pancreas head carcinoma in a 91-yr-old man. Int J Pancreatol 24, 133–138 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02788572
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02788572