Advertisement

Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology

, Volume 56, Issue 3, pp 235–241 | Cite as

The isolation and purification of diamine oxidase of pea seedlings and pig liver

  • Yüksel A. Güvenilir
  • Nüran Deveci
Original Articles

Abstract

Enzymes have been extensively used in many industries for the last 20 years. They are becoming more common because of new areas of application. The limitations of applications of enzymes are activity, specificity, stability, and price. Higher enzyme activities and less susceptibility of process conditions are desirable. Therefore, in some cases, purified enzyme extracts are needed. The purpose of this study is the isolation and purification of diamine oxidase (DAO) of pea seedlings and pig liver. The relationship between pea seedlings growth rate and enzyme activity is established. DAO of pea seedlings and pig liver is prepared by way of tissue disruption with homogenization, centrifugation, fractionation with ammonium sulfate, precipitation of inert components, column electrophoresis, and DEAE-cellulose column chromatography. The specific activity of disrupted pea seedlings cells was measured as 0.017 (U/mg protein), and the pig liver DAO activity was measured as 0.00037 (U/mg protein). The specific enzyme activity from pea seedlings was increased to 6.750 (U/mg protein). On the other hand, the specific enzyme activity from pig liver was increased to 0.30 (U/mg protein). The final enzyme extract from pea is 400-fold purer than raw material, and the final enzyme extract from pig liver is 820-fold purer than raw material.

Index Entries

Enzyme diamine oxidase enzyme purification pea seedlings pig liver 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Mann, P. J. G. (1961),Biochem. J. 79, 623–631.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Perin, A. (1968),Biochem. J. 234, 119–125.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shaltiel, S., Hedrick, J. L., and Fischer, E. H. (1969),Biochemistry 8, 2429–2436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hames, D. B. and Rickwood, D. (1981), inGel Electrophoresis of Proteins, IRL, Oxford, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Darbyshire, J. (1981), inTopics in Enzyme and Fermentation Biotechnology, vol. 5, Ellis Harwood, Chichester, pp. 51–70.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Price, N. C. and Stewens, L. (1982), inFundamentals of Enzymology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 29–41.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stock, R. and Rice, F. B. C. (1974),Chromatografic Methods, Chapman and Hall, Norwich.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bergmeyer J. and GraB1, M. (1981), inMethods of Enzymatic Analysis, vols. 2 and 3, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, pp. 84–95.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gerhartz, W. (1991), inEnzymes in Industry, V. C. H., Weinheim, pp. 43–62.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bristionsen, B. and Bu’lock, J. (1968), inBasic Biotechnology, Wiley, New York, pp. 385–425.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yüksel A. Güvenilir
    • 1
  • Nüran Deveci
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringIstanbul Technical UniversityMaslak, IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations