Advertisement

Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 29, Issue 5, pp 820–830 | Cite as

Horseshoe crabs (Limulus polyphemus) in an urban estuary (Jamaica Bay, New York) and the potential for ecological restoration

  • Mark L. Botton
  • Robert E. Loveland
  • John T. Tanacredi
  • Tomio Itow
Article

Abstract

We assessed the suitability of intertidal habitats for spawning by horseshoe crabs (Limulus polyphemus) at 12 proposed restoration sites identified by the United States Army Corps of Engineers along the shore of Jamaica Bay, a highly developed estuary in New York City. Based on beach geomorphology, we chose to quantify horseshoe crab activity at five of the sites during the May–July 2000 breeding season. Horseshoe crabs spawned intensively on small patches of suitable sand within larger areas of eroding shoreline with bulkheads and rubble fill. Small areas of sand behind grounded barges at Brant Point and Dubos Point had densities of over 100,000 eggs m−2, which was equal to or greater than the egg densities on longer, more natural appearing beaches at Spring Creek and Dead Horse Bay, or at a sand spit at Bayswater State Park. There were no significant differences in the percentage of Jamaica Bay horseshoe crab eggs that completed development when cultured using water from Jamaica Bay or lower Delaware Bay, a less polluted location. Only 1% of the embryos from Jamaica Bay exhibited developmental anomalies, a frequency comparable to a previously studied population from Delaware Bay. We suggest that the distribution and abundance of horseshoe crabs at our study areas in Jamaica Bay is presently limited by the availability of suitable shoreline for breeding, rather than by water quality. Restoration efforts that increase the amount of sandy beach in this urban estuary have a good likelihood of benefiting horseshoe crabs and providing additional value to migrating shorebirds that use horseshoe crab eggs as food.

Keywords

Beach Sandy Beach Horseshoe Crab Barge Spawning Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC). 1998. Interstate fishery management plan for horseshoe crab. Fishery Management Report No. 32. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  2. Bopp, R. F., H. J. Simpson, S. N. Chillrud, andD. W. Robinson. 1993. Sediment-derived chronologies of persistent contaminants in Jamaica Bay, New York.Estuaries 16:608–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Botton, M. L. 2000. Toxicity of cadmium and mercury to horseshoe crab (Limulus polyphemus) embryos and larvae.Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 64:137–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Botton, M. L. 2001. The conservation of horseshoe crabs: What can we learn from the Japanese experience?. p. 41–51.In J. T. Tanacredi (ed.),Limulus in the Limelight—A Species 350 Million Years in the Making and in Peril?. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Botton, M. L., M. Hodge, andT. I. Gonzalez. 1998b. High tolerance to tributyltin in embryos and larvae of the horseshoe crab,Limulus polyphemus.Estuaries 21:340–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Botton, M. L., K. Johnson, andL. Helleby. 1998a. Effects of copper and zinc on embryos and larvae of the horseshoe crab,Limulus polyphemus.Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 35:25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Botton, M. L. andR. E. Loveland. 1992. Body size, morphological constraints, and mated pair formation in four populations of horseshoe crabs (Limulus polyphemus) along a geographic cline.Marine Biology 112:409–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Botton, M. L., R. E. Loveland, andT. R. Jacobsen. 1988. Beach erosion and geochemical factors: Influence on spawning success of horseshoe crabs (Limulus polyphemus) in Delaware Bay.Marine Biology 99:325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Botton, M. L., R. E. Loveland, andT. R. Jacobsen. 1994. Site selection by migratory shorebirds in Delaware Bay, and its relationship to beach characteristics and the abundance of horseshoe crab (Limulus polyphemus) eggs.The Auk 111:605–616.Google Scholar
  10. Botton, M. L. andC. N. Shuster. 2003. Horseshoe crabs in a food web: Who eats whom?, p. 133–153.In C. N. Shuster, R. B. Barlow, and H. J. Brockmann (eds.), The American Horseshoe Crab. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, K. M., J. L. Tims, R. M. Erwin, andM. E. Richmond. 2001. Changes in the nesting populations of colonial waterbirds in Jamaica Bay wildlife refuge, New York, 1974–1998.Northeastern Naturalist 8:275–292.Google Scholar
  12. Chen, C. P., H. Y. Yeh, andP. F. Lin. 2004. Conservation of the horseshoe crab at Kinmen, Taiwan: Strategies and practices.Biodiversity and Conservation 13:1889–1904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiu, H. M. C. andB. Morton. 2003. The status of horseshoe crabs in Hong Kong, p. 741–756.In B. Morton (ed.), Perspectives on Marine Environment Change in Hong Kong and Southern China, 1977–2001. Hong Kong University Press, Aberdeen, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  14. Duffy, E. E., D. J. Penn, M. L. Botton, H. J. Brockmann, andR. E. Loveland. 2006. Eye and clasper damage influence male mating tactics in the horseshoe crab,Limulus polyphemus.Journal of Ethology 24:67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ehrenfeld, J. G. 2000. Evaluating wetlands within an urban context.Urban Ecosystems 4:69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Franz, D. R. 1982. A historical perspective on molluscs in lower New York harbor, with emphasis on oysters, p. 181–197.In G. F. Mayer (ed.), Ecological Stress and the New York Bight: Science and Management. Estuarine Research Federation, Columbia, South Carolina.Google Scholar
  17. Franz, D. R. andW. H. Harris. 1988. Seasonal and spatial variability in macrobenthos communities in Jamaica Bay, New York—An urban estuary.Estuaries 11:15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Franz, D. R. andJ. T. Tanacredi. 1992. Secondary production of the amphipodAmpelisca abdita Mills and its importance in the diet of juvenile winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) in Jamaica Bay, New York.Estuaries 15:193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gornitz, V., S. Couch, andE. K. Hartig. 2002. Impacts of sea level rise in the New York City metropolitan area.Global and Planetary Changes 32:61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hanna, D. H. 2001. An estimate of population sizes of two horseshoe crab (Limulus polyphemus) sites in Jamaica Bay, p. 147–153.In J. T. Tanacredi (ed.),Limulus in the Limelight—A Species 350 Million Years in the Making and in Peril. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Hartig, E. K., V. Gornitz, A. Kolker, F. Mushacke, andD. Fallon. 2002. Anthropogenic and climate-change impacts on salt marshes of Jamaica Bay, New York City.Wetlands 22:71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Itow, T., R. E. Loveland, andM. L. Botton. 1998. Developmental abnormalities in horseshoe crab embryos caused by exposure to heavy metals.Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 35:33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jackson, N. L., K. F. Nordstrom, andD.R. Smith. 2005. Influence of waves and horseshoe crab spawning on beach morphology and sediment grain-size characteristics on a sandy estuarine beach.Sedimentology 52:1097–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. James-Pirri, M. J., K. Tuxbury, S. Marino, andS. Koch. 2005. Spawning densities, egg densities, size structure, and movement patterns of spawning horseshoe crabs,Limulus polyphemus, on Cape Cod, Massachusetts.Estuaries 28:296–313.Google Scholar
  25. Jegla, T. C. andJ. D. Costlow, Jr. 1982. Temperature and salinity effects on developmental and early posthatch stages ofLimulus, p. 103–113.In J. Bonaventura, C. Bonaventura and S. Tesh (eds.), Physiology and Biology of Horseshoe Crabs: Studies on Normal and Environmentally Stressed Animals. Alan R. Liss Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  26. Kurtzke, C. 2001. Horseshoe crab surveys using underwater videography, p. 119–129.In J. T. Tanacredi (ed.),Limulus in the Limelight—A Species 350 Million Years in the Making and in Peril. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Laughlin, R. 1983. The effects of temperature and salinity on larval growth of the horseshoe crabLimulus polyphemus.Biological Bulletin 164:93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Levin, J., D. Hochstein, andT. J. Novitsky. 2003. Clotting cells andLimulus amoebocyte lysate: An amazing analytical tool, p. 310–340.In C. N. Shuster, R. B. Barlow, and H. J. Brockmann (eds.), The American Horseshoe Crab. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  29. Morton, B. 1999. On turtles, dolphins and, now, Asia's horseshoe crabs.Marine Pollution Bulletin 38:845–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nordstrom, M. F. 2005. Beach nourishment and coastal habitats: Research needs to improve compatibility.Restoration Ecology 13:215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. O'Connor, J. S., J. A. Ranasinghe, andD. A. Adams. 1998. Tem poralchange in sediment quality of the New York harbor area.Bulletin of the New Jersey Academy of Science 43:1–6.Google Scholar
  32. O'Shea, M. L. andT. M. Brosnan. 2000. Trends in indicators of eutrophication in western Long Island Sound and the Hudson-Raritan estuary.Estuaries 23:877–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Penn, D. andH. J. Brockmann. 1994. Nest-site selection in the horseshoe crab,Limulus polyphemus.Biological Bulletin 187:373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peterson, C. H andM. J. Bishop. 2005. Assessing the environmental impacts of beach nourishment.BioScience 55:887–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peterson, C. H., D. H. M. Hickerson, G. G. Johnson. 2000. Short-term consequences of nourishment and bulldozing on the dominant large invertebrates of a sandy beach.Journal of Coastal Research 16:368–378.Google Scholar
  36. Pooler, P. S., D. R. Smith, R. E. Loveland, M. L. Botton, andS. F. Michels. 2003. Assessment of sampling methods to estimate horseshoe crab (Limulus polyphemus L.) egg density in Delaware Bay.Fishery Bulletin 101:698–703.Google Scholar
  37. Riepe, D. 2001. Horseshoe crabs: An ancient wonder of New York and a great topic for environmental education, p. 131–134.In J. T. Tanacredi (ed.)Limulus in the Limelight—A Species 350 Million Years in the Making and in Peril. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Seidemann, D. E. 1991. Metal pollution in sediments of Jamaica Bay, New York, USA—An urban estuary.Environmental Management 15:73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shuster, C. N. 1979. Distribution of the American horseshoe “crab”,Limulus polyphemus (L.), p. 3–26.In E. Cohen (ed.), Biomedical Applications of the Horseshoe Crab (Limulidae). Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  40. Sokoloff, A. 1978. Observations on populations of the horseshoe crabLimulus (=Xiphosura) polyphemus).Researches on Population Ecology 19:222–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Strobel, C. J. andA. H. Brenowitz. 1981. Effects of bunker C oil on juvenile horseshoe crabs (Limulus polyphemus).Estuaries 4:157–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Swan, B. L. 2005. Migrations of adult horseshoe crabs,Limulus polyphemus, in the middle Atlantic Bight: A 17-year tagging study.Estuaries 28:28–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tanacredi, J. T. 1987. Natural resource management policy constraints and trade-offs in an urban national recreation area, p. 221–227.In L. W. Adams and D. L. Leedy (eds.), Integrating Man and Nature in the Metropolitan Environment, Proceedings of the National Symposium on Urban Wildlife. National Institute for Urban Wildlife, Columbia, Maryland.Google Scholar
  44. Tanacredi, J. T. 1995. Gateway: A Visitor's Companion. Stackpole Books, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  45. Walls, E. A., J. Berkson, andS. A. Smith. 2002. The horseshoe crab,Limulus polyphemus: 200 million years of existence, 100 years of study.Reviews in Fisheries Science 10:39–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weinstein, M. P. andD. J. Reed. 2005. Sustainable coastal development: The dual mandate and a recommendation for “commerce managed areas”.Restoration Ecology 13:174–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weis, J. S. andA. Ma. 1987. Effects of the pesticide Diflubenzuron on larval horseshoe crabs,Limulus polyphemus.Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 39:224–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. West-Valle, A. S., C. J. Decker, andR. L. Swanson. 1992. Use Impairments of Jamaica Bay—Special Report #99. The Waste Management Institute, Marine Science Research Center, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York.Google Scholar
  49. Widener, J. W. andR. B. Barlow. 1999. Decline of a horseshoe crab population on Cape Cod.Biological Bulletin 197:300–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yozzo, D. J., P. Wilber, andR. J. Will. 2004. Beneficial use of dredged material for habitat creation, enhancement, and restoration in New York-New Jersey Harbor.Journal of Environmental Management 73:39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Source of Unpublished Materials

  1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE), New York District. 2004. Jamaica Bay study area report, Hudson-Raritan estuary environmental restoration feasibility study. (http://www.nan. usace.army.mil/harbor/links/JamaicaBay_SAR_RevSep04.pdf)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark L. Botton
    • 1
  • Robert E. Loveland
    • 2
  • John T. Tanacredi
    • 3
  • Tomio Itow
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Natural SciencesFordham College at Lincoln CenterNew York
  2. 2.Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Cook CollegeRutgers UniversityNew Brunswick
  3. 3.Department of Earth and Marine ScienceDowling CollegeOakdale
  4. 4.Department of Biology, Faculty of EducationShizuoka UniversityShizuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations