, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 3–6 | Cite as

Napster, distributed peer sharing, and it’s chronology: “you say you want a revolution?”

  • R. S. Talab


Compulsory License TechTrends Volume Music Industry Awkward Position Copyright Infringement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arnold, G. (2001, February 22). Bleakhouse: The legal battle over Napster could last longer than ‘In-a-Gadda-Da-Vida.’ Metroactive Central. Retrieved April 15, 2002 fromhttp:// 02.22.01/napster-0108.html. Google Scholar
  2. Associated Press. (2002, April 15). Instant messages, intercepted messages. USA Retrieved April 14, 2002 fromhttp:// www.usatoday. com Google Scholar
  3. Featherly, K. (2001, September 6). Post-Napster, file-swappingbigger than ever. Webnoize. Retrieved April 12, 2002 fromhttp: // www.washtech. com/news/edia/ 12350-1.html Google Scholar
  4. King, B. (2001, March 23). Napster: Artists getting screwed. Wired News. RetrievedApril 10, 2002 from http: // www.wired.comGoogle Scholar
  5. Rosenberg, S. (2000, February 4). The Napster files. Salon.Com Retrieved April 12, 2002 fromhttp:// Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Intellectual Property Information CenterKansas State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations