Skip to main content
Log in

Napster, distributed peer sharing, and it’s chronology: “you say you want a revolution?”

  • Columns
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Arnold, G. (2001, February 22). Bleakhouse: The legal battle over Napster could last longer than ‘In-a-Gadda-Da-Vida.’ Metroactive Central. Retrieved April 15, 2002 fromhttp:// www.metroactive.com/papers/metrol 02.22.01/napster-0108.html.

  • Associated Press. (2002, April 15). Instant messages, intercepted messages. USA Today.com Retrieved April 14, 2002 fromhttp:// www.usatoday. com

  • Featherly, K. (2001, September 6). Post-Napster, file-swappingbigger than ever. Webnoize. Retrieved April 12, 2002 fromhttp: // www.washtech. com/news/edia/ 12350-1.html

  • King, B. (2001, March 23). Napster: Artists getting screwed. Wired News. RetrievedApril 10, 2002 from http: // www.wired.com

  • Rosenberg, S. (2000, February 4). The Napster files. Salon.Com Retrieved April 12, 2002 fromhttp:// www.salon.com/tech/col/rose/2000/02/04/napster_swap

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. S. Talab.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Talab, R.S. Napster, distributed peer sharing, and it’s chronology: “you say you want a revolution?”. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 46, 3–6 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02784834

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02784834

Keywords

Navigation