Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of shoreline modification on a Northern Puget Sound beach: Microclimate and embryo mortality in surt smelt (Hypomesus pretiosus)

  • Published:
Estuaries and Coasts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human alteration of Puget Sound shorelines is extensive yet its ecological consequences are largely undocumented. This study evaluates differences between natural and heavily modified beaches in terms of microclimate and one aspect of biological condition. Electronic data laggers were placed at a tidal height of approximately 3.7 m (12 ft) above mean lower low water during July 16–20, 2001, to monitor light intensity, substrate and air temperatures, and humidity. Substrate samples were collected at the end of the monitoring period to evaluate condition and density of eggs from surf smelt (Hypomesus pretiosus), a forage fish species that spawns on gravel-sand beaches in the upper intertidal zone. The modified beach had significantly higher daily mean light intensity, air temperature and substrate temperature, and significantly lower daily mean relative humidity. Particularly striking were the differences in substrate temperature which, on the natural beach, ranged from 12.1°C to 18.2°C (mean=14.1°C) and on the modified beach ranged from 14.4°C to 29.4°C (mean=18.8°C). In addition to these different means and more extreme values, microclimate conditions on the modified beach were more variable, indicative of a less buffered environment. The proportion of smelt eggs containing live embryos on the altered beach was approximately half that of the natural beach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Angermeier, P. L. andJ. R. Karr 1994. Biological integrity versus biological diversity as policy directives.Bioscience 44:690–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attill, M. J., D. T. Bilton, A. A. Rowden, S.D. Rundle andR. M. Thomas. 1999. The impact of encroachment and bankside development on the habitat complexity and supralittoral invertebrate communities of the Thames Estuary fore-shore.Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 9:237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J. S. andH. Culverwell 2004. Marine riparian: An assessment of riparian functions in marine ecosystem. Washington Sea Grant, Seattle, Washington. http://www.wsg. washington edn/research/ecohealth/brennanlr.pdf (accessed 8/4/2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosofske, K. D., J. Chen, R. J. Naiman, andJ. F. Franklin. 1997. Harvesting effects on microclimatic gradients from small streams to uplands in western Washington.Ecological Applications 7:1188–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. Q., S. C. Saunders, T. R. Crow, R. J. Naiman, K. D. Brosoeske, G. D. Mroz, B. L. Brookshire, andJ. F. Franklin. 1999. Microclimate in forest ecosystem and landscape ecology—Variations in local climate can be used to monitor and compare the effects of different management regimes.Bioscience 49:288–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombini, I. andL. Chelazzi. 2003. Influence of marine allochthonous input on sandy beach communities.Oceanography and Marine Biology 41:115–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. H. 1978. Diversity on tropical rain forests and coral reefs.Science 199:1302–1310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day J. W., C. A. S. Hall, W. M. Kemp andA. Yanez-Arancibia. 1989. Estuarine Ecology, 1st edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demartini, E. E. 1999. Intertidal spawning. p. 143–164.In M. H. Horn, K. L. M. Martin, and M. A. Chotkowski (eds.), Intertidal Fishes: Life in Two Worlds, 1st edition. Academic Press, San Diego, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, T. M. andF. R. Thompson. 2001. Modeling the ecological trap hypothesis: A habitat and demographic analysis for migrant songbirds.Ecological Applications 11:871–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing, J. 1983. The Coast of Puget Sound: Its Processes and Development, 1st edition. Washington Sea Grant, Seattle, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugan, J. E., D. M. Hubbard, M. D. McCrary, andM. O. Pierson. 2003. The response of macrofauna communities and shorebirds to macrophyte wrack subsidies on exposed sandy beaches of southern California.Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 58:25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, K. F. andD. A. Farris. 1971. Some influences of temperature on the development of the grunionLeuresthes tenuis (Ayres).California Fish and Game 57:58–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feist, B. E., E. A. Steel, G. R. Pess, and R. E. Bilby. 2003. The Influence of scale on salmon habitat restoration priorities.Animal Conservation 6:271–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, K. T. andW. C. Leggett. 1981a. Prediction of egg development and mortality rates in capelin (Mallotus villosus) from meteorological, hydrographic, and biological factors.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38:1327–1338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, K. T. andW. C. Leggett. 1981b. Wind regulation of emergence times and early larval survival in capelin (Mallotus villosus).Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38:215–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, R. 1965. The Climate Near the Ground. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jedrzejczak, M. F. 2002. Spatio-temporal decay “hot spots” of stranded wrack in a Baltic sandy coastal system. Part I. Comparative study of the pattern: 1 type of warck vs 3 beach sites.Oceanologia 44:491–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, O. W., W. S. Grant, R. G. Kope, K. Neely, F. W. Waknitz, and R. S. Waples. 1997. Status review of chum salmon from Washington, Oregon, and California. Technological Memo. U.S. Department of Commerce, national Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NMFS-NWFSC-32, Seattle, Washington.

  • Karr, J. R. 1991. Biological integrity: A long neglected aspect of water resource management.Ecological Applications 1:66–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey, K. A. andD. W. West 1998. Riparian wildlife, p. 235–260.In R. J. Naiman and R. E. Bilby (eds.), River Ecology and Management: Lessons from the Pacific Coastal Ecoregion. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, G. A. 2001. The Ecology of Seashores, 1st edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozloff, E. N. 1983. Seashore life of the northern Pacific Coast, 1st edition. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruckeberg, A. R. 1991. The Natural History of the Puget Sound Country, 1st edition. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S. A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology.Ecology 73:1943–1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levings C. D. and G. Jamieson. 2001. Marine and estuarine riparian habitats and their role in coastal ecosystem, Pacific region. Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Research Document 2001/109. Ottowa, Canada.

  • Loosanoff, V. L. 1937. The spawning run of the Pacific surf smelt.Hypomesus pretiosus (Girard).Internationale Revue der gesamter Hydrobiologie and Hydrographie 36:170–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, K., D. Simpson, B. Paulson, J. Cox, and J. Gendron. 1994. Shoreline Armoring Effects on Physical Coastal Processes in Puget Sound, Washington, Washington Department of Ecology. Report 94–78. Olympia. Washington

  • Martin, K. L. M. andD. L. Swiderski. 2001. Beach spawning in fishes: Phylogenetic tests of hypotheses.American Zoologist 41:526–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middaugh, D. P., H. W. Kohl, andL. E. Burnett. 1983. Concurrent measurement of intertidal environmental variables and embryo survival for the California grunion.Leureshes tenuis, and Atlantic silverside,Menidia menidia (Pisces, Atherinidae).California Fish and Game 69:89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J. M., R. G. Kope, G. J. Bryant, D. Teel, L. J. Lierheimer, T. C. Wainwright, W. S. Grant, F. W. Waknitz, K. Neely, S. T. Lindley, and R. S. Waples. 1998. Status review of chinook salmon from Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and California. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Tech Memo NMFS-NWFSC-35, Seattle, Washington.

  • Naiman R. J., K. L. Fetherson, S. J. McKay, andJ. Chen. 1998. Riparian Forests, p. 289–323.In R. J. Naiman and R. E. Bilby (eds.) River Ecology and Management: Lessons from the Pacific Coastal Ecoregion, 1st edition. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penttila, D. E. 1973. Observations on some Puget Sound spawning beaches of the surf smelt (Hypomesus pretiosus). Supplemental Progress Report. Washington Department of Fisheries, Olympia, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penttila, D. E. 1978. Studies of the surf smelt (Hypomesus pretiosus) in Puget Sound. Washington Department of Fisheries, Technical Report No. 42, Olympia, Washington.

  • Penttila, D. E. 1995. The WDFW's Puget Sound in tertidal baitfish spawning beach survey project. Puget Sound Research '95. Conference proceedings 235–241.

  • Penttila, D. E. 2001. Effects of shading upland vegetation on egg survival for summer-spawning surf smelt on upper intertidal beaches in Puget Sound. Puget Sound Research 2001 Conference Proceedings. http://www. psat.wa.gov/Publications/ 01_proceedings/sesions/oral/2_pentt.pdf (accessed July 17, 2005).

  • Phillips, R. C. 1984. The Ecology of Eelgrass Meadows in the Pacific Northwest: A Community Profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-84/24, Washington, D.C.

  • Polis, G. A. andS. D. Hurd. 1996. Linking marine and terrestrial food webs: Alloch thonous input from the ocean supports high secondary productivity on small islands and coastal land communities.American Naturalist 147:396–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team (PSWQAT) 2002. 2002 Puget Sound Update: Eighth Report of the Puget Sound Ambient Monitoring Program. Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team. Olympia, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, P. J. A. andH. E. Macalister 1994. Acari of the supralittoral zone on sub-Antarctic South Georgia.Pedobiologia 38:552–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafaelli, D. andS. Hawkins. 1996. Intertidal Ecology. 1st edition. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts, E. F., J. Calvin, J. W. Hedgpeth, andD. W. Phillips. 1985. Between Pacific Tides, 5th edition. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs, R. E. andG. Miller. 2000. Ecology, 4th edition, W. H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanuk, T. N. andC. D. Levings. 2003. Associations between arthropods and the supralittoral ecotone: Dependence of aquatic and terrestrial taxa on riparian vegetation.Environmental Entomology 32:1343–1353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, M. B. 1936. Contributions to the life history of the surf smelt (Hypomesus pretiosus) in Puget Sound. Washington Department of Fisheries, Biological report 35-B, Olympia, Washington.

  • Simenstad, C. A. 1983. The ecology of estuarine channels of the Pacific Northwest: A community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Services Program. FWS/OBS-83/05. Washington, D.C.

  • Simenstad, C. A., B. S. Miller, C. F. Nyblade, K. Thornburgh, and L. J. Bledsoe. 1979. Food web relationships of Northern Puget Sound and the Straight of Juan de Fuca. Office of Engineering and Technology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 600/7-79-259, Washington, D.C.

  • Smyder, E. A. andK. L. M. Martin. 2002. Temperature effects on egg survival and hatching during the extended incubation period of California grunion,Leuresthes tenuis.Copeia 2:313–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobocinski K. L. 2003. The Impact of Shoreline Armoring on Supratidal Beach Fauna of Central Puger Sound. M.S. Thesis. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, R. M. and D. K. Shreffler. 1994. Shoreline Armoring Effects on Coastal Ecology and Biological Resources in Puget Sound, Washington. Washington Department of Ecology, Report 94–80. Olympia, Washington.

  • Thompson, W. F. and associates. 1936. The spawning of the silver smelt,Hypomesus pretiosus.Ecology 17:158–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1999. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: Determination of threatened status for bull trout in the coterminous United States. Federal Register Volume 64, number 210, pages 58909–58933, Washington, D.C.

  • Valiela, I. 1995. Marine Ecological Processes, 2nd edition. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, W., S. Szarek, W. Lauenroth, R. Kinerson, andM. Smith. 1978. Primary productivity and water use in native forest, grassland, and desert ecosystems.Ecology 59:1239–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitkamp, L. A., T. C. Wainwright, G. C. Bryant, G. B. Milner, D. J. Teel, R. G. Kope, and R. S. Waples. 1995. Status Review of Coho Salmon from Washington, Oregon, and California, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Tech Memo NMFS-NWFSC-24, Seattle, Washington.

  • Williams, G. D. and R. M. Thom. 2001. Marine and estuarine shoreline modification issues: White paper submitted to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington Department of Ecology, and Washington Department of Transportation. http://wdfw.wa.gov/hab/ahg/marnrsrc.htm (accessed July 17, 2005).

  • Yap-Chionggo, J. V. 1941.Hypomesus pretiosus, its development and early life history. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Washington. Seattle, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J. H. 1996. Biostatistical Analysis, 3rd edition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

Source of Unpublished Materials

  • Lee, C. personal communication. Keystone Environmental Ltd., 320–4400 Dominion Street, Burnaby, B.C., Canada V5G-4M7.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mukilteo Field Facility, National Marine Fisheries Service, 10 Park Avenue Building B, 98275, Mukilteo, Washington

    Casimir A. Rice

  2. University of Washington School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, 1122 Boat Street NE, 98105, Seattle, Washington

    Casimir A. Rice

Authors
  1. Casimir A. Rice
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rice, C.A. Effects of shoreline modification on a Northern Puget Sound beach: Microclimate and embryo mortality in surt smelt (Hypomesus pretiosus). Estuaries and Coasts: J ERF 29, 63–71 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02784699

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02784699

Keywords

Search

Navigation