Biological Trace Element Research

, Volume 68, Issue 1, pp 63–78 | Cite as

Tissue-Specific antioxidant profiles and susceptibility to lipid peroxidation of the newly hatched chick

  • Peter F. Surai
  • Brian K. Speake
  • Raymond C. Noble
  • Nick H. C. Sparks
Original Articles


The hatching process is characterized by a range of adaptive changes, and a newly hatched chick is considered as an intermediate stage between prenatal and postnatal development. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the characteristic relationships between tissue-specific fatty acid composition and antioxidant protection in newly hatched chicks. Liver, yolk sac membrane, heart, kidney, lung, and four brain regions (cerebrum, cerebellum, stem, and optic lobes) were collected. Fatty acid composition of total lipids and phosphoglycerides, α-tocopherol, lutein, ascorbic acid, reduced glutathione, and the activities of Mn-and Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase (SOD) and Se-dependent and non-Se-glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), and catalase (CAT) were determined. The levels of Fe, Cu, Zn, and Mn as well as tissue susceptibility to lipid peroxidation were also studied. The tissues of the newly hatched chick showed distinctive features in fatty acid profiles, antioxidant accumulation, and susceptibility to lipid peroxidation. The brain clearly displayed the greatest susceptibility to spontaneous and Fe-stimulated lipid peroxidation, was highly unsaturated and contained very low levels of vitamin E, no detectable carotenoids, low GSH-Px, and low CAT activity. At the same time, the brain was characterized by high ascorbic acid concentration and comparatively high SOD activity. It was suggested that in postnatal development, antioxidant enzymes presumably play the major role in antioxidant protection of the chick tissues.

Index Entries

Chicken embryo antioxidants antioxidant enzymes lipid peroxidation fatty acids PUFA 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. L. Romanoff,The Avian Embryo. Structural and Functional Development, The Macmillan Company, New York (1960).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. C. Noble and B. K. Speake, Observations on fatty acid uptake and utilization by the avian embryo,Prenat. Neonat. Med. 2, 92–100 (1997).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. F. Surai, R. C. Noble, and B. K. Speake, Tissue-specific differences in antioxidant distribution and susceptibility to lipid peroxidation during development of the chick embryo,Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1304, 1–10 (1996).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. H. J. Visschedijk, The air space and embryonic respiration. 1. The pattern of gaseous exchange in the fertile egg during the closing stages of incubation,Br. Poultry Sci. 9, 173–184 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. A. Jerret, S. Jefferson, D. Mengel, and C. E. Seizures, H2O2 formation and lipid peroxides in brain during exposure to oxygen under high pressure,Aerospace Med. 44, 40–44 (1973).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. K. Stock, K. K. Silvernail, and J. Metcalfe, Prenatal oxidative stress: 1. Malondialdehyde in hypoxic and hyperoxic chick embryos,Free Radical Biol. Med. 8, 313–318 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Gaal, M. Mezes, R. C. Noble, J. Dixon, and B. K. Speake, Development of antioxidant capacity in tissues of the chick embryo.Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 112B, 711–716 (1995).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. X. Wilson, Antioxidant defence of the brain: a role for astrocytes,Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 75, 1149–1163 (1997).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. W. Christie, Isolation of lipids from tissues, inLipid Analysis: Isolation, Separation, Identification and Structural Analysis of Lipids, 2nd ed., W. Christie, ed., Pergamon, Oxford, pp. 17–25. (1982).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. W. Christie, R. C. Noble, and J. H. Moore, Determination of lipid classes by gas Chromatographic procedure.Analys,95, 940–944 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. H. McMurray, W. J. Blanchflower, and D. A. Rice, Influence of extraction techniques on the determination of a-tocopherol in animal feedstuffs,J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 63, 1258–1261 (1980).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. E. Craft, Carotenoid reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography methods: reference compendium, inMethods in Enzymology, L. Packer, ed., Academic Press, Inc., San Diego-New York,213, 185–205 (1992).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. T. Omaye, J. D. Turnbull, and H. E. Sauberlich, Selected methods for the determination of ascorbic acid in animal cells, tissues, and fluids, inMethods in Enzymology, D. B. McCormic and L. D. Wright, eds. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego-New York,62, 3–14 (1979).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    O. W. Griffith, Determination of glutathione and glutathione disulphide using glutathione reductase and 2-vinylpyridine,Anal. Biochem. 6, 213–222 (1980).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. J. Wilson, T. S. Oostdyk, and P. N. Keliher, Determination of arsenic and selenium in environmental and agricultural samples by hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry,J. Assoc.Off. Anal. Chem. 71, 1090–1093 (1988).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. X. Wilson, E. M. K. Lui, and R. F. Del Maestro, Developmental profiles of antioxidant enzymes and trace metals in chick embryo,Mech. Aging Dev. 65, 51–64 (1992).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. St. Clair and C. Chow, Glutathione peroxidase: activity and steady-state level of mRNA, inFree Radicals: A Practical Approach, N. Punchard and E Kelly, eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 227–240 (1996).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    W. Michalski, Resolution of three forms of Superoxide dismutase by immobilised metal affinity chromatography,J. Chromatogr. B 576, 340–345 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Ohkawa, N. Ohishi, and K. Yagi, Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction,Anal. Biochem. 139, 292–298 (1979).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    H. Fuhrmann and H-P. Sallmann, The influence of dietary fatty acids and vitamin E on plasma prostanoids and liver microsomal alkane production in broiler chickens with regard to nutritional encephalomalacia,J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 41, 553–561 (1995).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    L. Packer and S. Landvik, Vitamin E — introduction to its biochemistry and health benefits, inVitamin E Biochemistry and Health Implications. A. T. Diplock, L. J. Machlin, L. Packer, and W. A. Pryor W. A., eds., New York Academy of Science, New York, pp. 1–6 (1989).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    L. Packer, Interactions among antioxidants in health and disease: vitamin E and its redox cycle,Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 200, 271–276 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    P. F. Surai, I. A. Ionov, E. F. Kuchmistova, R. C. Noble, and B. K. Speake, The relationship between the levels of cc-tocopherol and carotenoids in the maternal feed, yolk and neonatal tissues: comparison between the chicken, turkey, duck and goose,J. Sci. Food Agric. 76, 593–598 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    C. A. Rice-Evans, J. Sampson, P. M. Bramley, and D. E. Holloway, Why do we expect carotenoids to be antioxidants in vivo?Free Radical Res. 26, 381–398 (1997).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. C. Noble and M. Cocchi, Lipid metabolism in the neonatal chicken,Prog. Lipid Res. 29, 107–140 (1990).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. F. Turrens, Superoxide production by the mitochondrial respiratory chain,Bioscience Rep. 17, 3–8 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    W. G. Bottje and R. F. Wideman, Potential role of free radicals in the pathogenesis of pulmonary hypertension syndrome,Poultry Avian Biol. Rev. 6, 211–231 (1995).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Hassan, J. Hakkarainen, L. Jonsson, and J. Tyopponen, Histological and biochemical changes associated with selenium and vitamin E deficiency in chicks,J. Vet. Med. A 37, 708–720 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. J. Christensen and K. W. Burgener, Dietary selenium stabilizes glutathione peroxidase mRNA in rat liver,J. Nutr. 122, 1620–1626 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    P. F. Surai, Tissue-specific changes in the activities of antioxidant enzymes during the development of the chicken embryo,Br. Poultry Sci., in press (1999).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter F. Surai
    • 1
    • 2
  • Brian K. Speake
    • 1
  • Raymond C. Noble
    • 1
  • Nick H. C. Sparks
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biochemistry and NutritionScottish Agricultural CollegeAuchincruiueScotland, UK
  2. 2.Department of PhysiologyBiochemistry and Nutrition Poultry Research InstituteKharkov RegionUkraine

Personalised recommendations