Skip to main content
Log in

Evidence for lymphocyte chemotaxis toward monocytes during PHA-induced aggregation in vitro

  • Published:
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An important, early phenomenon during the development of immune cell interactions in vitro is the formation of multicellular aggregates. We have developed a quantitative assay to determine the kinetics of multicellular aggregate formation within a heterotypic population of cells on a flat surface. This assay follows the time rate of change in the value of an aggregation index for cells in undisturbed culture. For an initial, well-separated population of cells, the index is a minimum and remains at this value if the cells do not move and interact. By contrast, for conditions that promote active cell movement followed by interaction, the index value increases with time. The index, which reflects cells’ relative spatial distributions, is an “indirect enumeration” of the number of cells within aggregates as a function of time.

We used this index to follow the aggregative behavior of a population of freshly isolated human peripheral lymphocytes and monocytes. Previous studies have shown that monocytes are centrally located within aggregates and that lymphocytes move to surround monocytes. In order to test if lymphocyte movements are random or directed prior to interactions with monocytes, we formulated a simple model to describe changes in the expected number of cells in an “idealized aggregate” as a function of time. A comparison of the model curves with curves generated from the changes in the aggregation index shows that the best fit derives from a model that involves directed movement of lymphocytes toward monocytes. These results suggest that monocytes produce a chemoattracting agent for lymphocytes for these experimental conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Unanue, E. R. and Allen, P. M. (1987) The basis for the immunoregulatory role of macrophages and other accessory cells.Science 236, 551–557.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Paul, W. E. (1984)Fundamental Immunology, Raven, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Springer, T. A. (1990) Adhesion receptors of the immune system.Nature 346, 425–434.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hall, D. J., O’Leary, J. J., and Rosenberg, A. (1984) Effects of temperature on aggregation and the mitogen-induced exit of lymphocytes from the resting state.J. Cell Physiol. 121, 206–214.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Breanstrup, O., Andersen, V., and Werdelin, O. (1976) Macrophage-lymphocyte clusters in the immune response to soluble protein antigen. VIII. Cinephotomicrographic studies.Cell Immunol. 25, 207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Petri, J., Br≸nstrup, O., and Werdelin, O. (1979)Scand. J. Immunol. 10, 493–498.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jackola, D. R. and O’Leary, J. J. (1989) Monocyte requirement for mitogeninduced aggregation of human peripheral blood mononuclear leukocytes in vitro.Exp. Cell Res. 184, 119–130.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fisher, E. S. and Lauffenberger, D. A. (1987) Mathematical analysis of celltarget encounter rates in two dimensions: the effect of chemotaxis.Biophys. J. 51, 705–716.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Feller, W. (1968)An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, vol. 1, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 68–72, 228.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weiss, G. H. (1967) First passage time problems in chemical physics, inAdvances in Chemical Physics, vol. 13 (Prigogine, I., ed.), Interscience Publishers, London, pp. 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Raman, R. K. (1977) Cellular aggregation towards steady point sources of attractant.J. Theoret. Biol. 64, 43–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bell, G. I. (1978) Models for the specific adhesion of cells to celsl.Science 200, 618–627.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Szabo, A., Schulten, K., and Schulten, Z. (1980) First passage time approach to diffusion controlled reactions.J. Chem. Phys.,72, 4350–4357.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Neter, J. and Wasserman, W. (1974)Applied Linear Statistical Models, Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, IL, pp. 113–121.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Raman, R. K. (1976) Analysis of the chemotactic response during aggregation in dictyoselium minutum.J. Cell Sci. 20, 497–512.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Parrott, D. M. V. and Wilkinson, P. C. (1981) Lymphocyte locomotion and migration.Prog. Allergy 28, 193–284.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilkinson, P. C. (1986) The cocomotor capacity of human lymphocytes and its enhancement by cell growth.Immunology 57, 281–289.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilkinson, P. C. (1987) Lymphocyte locomotion in vitro: the role of growth activators and chemoattractants.Biomed. Pharmacotherapy 41, 329–336.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Grimes, G. J., and Barnes, F. S. (1973) A technique for studying chemotaxis of leukocytes in well-defined chemotactic fields.Exp. Cell Res. 79, 375–384.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jackola, D.R., O’Leary, J.J. Evidence for lymphocyte chemotaxis toward monocytes during PHA-induced aggregation in vitro. Cell Biochem Biophys 20, 33–56 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02782653

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02782653

Index Entries

Navigation