Advertisement

Sophia

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 139–142 | Cite as

A third (meta-)critique

  • Nick Trakakis
Replies
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

I begin my third reply by answering some of the criticisms raised by Tierno against theodical attempts to account for the pervasiveness of moral evil. I then take the discussion to a meta-philosophical level, where I question the very way of thinking about God and evil implicit in Tierno’s critique and in much contemporary philosophy of religion.

Keywords

Human Freedom Level Playing Field Moral Choice Moral Evil Natural Evil 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer SBM B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Philosophy of ReligionUniversity of Notre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations