Abstract
I begin my third reply by answering some of the criticisms raised by Tierno against theodical attempts to account for the pervasiveness of moral evil. I then take the discussion to a meta-philosophical level, where I question the very way of thinking about God and evil implicit in Tierno’s critique and in much contemporary philosophy of religion.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trakakis, N. A third (meta-)critique. SOPHIA 45, 139–142 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02782489
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02782489