Skip to main content
Log in

Continuous xylose fermentation byCandida shehatae in a two-stage reactor

  • Session 2 Original Papers
  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent work has identified ethanol toxicity as a major factor preventing continuous production of ethanol at the concentrations obtainable in batch culture. In this paper we investigate the use of a continuous two-stage bioreactor design to circumvent toxic effects of ethanol. Biomass is produced via continuous culture in the first stage reactor in which ethanol concentrations are either absent or maintained at low levels. The freshly grown cells are fed into the second bioreactor in which high ethanol concentrations are produced. The steady influx of fresh cells and continuous removal of spent cells helps minimize the loss of fermentative activity that results from anaerobiosis and exposure to high ethanol concentrations. A final ethanol concentration of 37 g L−1 and overall yield of .32 g g−1 were obtained with the two-stage reactor as compared to corresponding values of 38 g L−1 and .32 g g−1 obtained in batch. The volumetric rate in the two-state process was .96 g L−1 as compared to .46 g L−1 h−1 in batch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sreenath, H., Chapman, T. and Jeffries, T. (1986),Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24, 294.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander, M., Chapman, T. and Jeffries, T. (1987),Biotechnol. Bioeng. 30, 685.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pironti, F. (1971), PhD. thesis, Cornell University, New York.

  4. Navarro, J. and Durand, G. (1978),Ann. Microbiol. (Inst. Pasteur),129b, 215.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, J., Williamson, D. and Rogers, P. (1980).Biotechnol. Lett.,2, 141.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, S., Oliver, S., Harrison, D. and Righelato, R. (1981),Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 11, 151.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Benitez, T., Castillo, L., Aguiler, A., Conde, J. and Cerda-Olmeda, E. (1983),Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45, 1429.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kalmokoff, M. and Ingledew, W. (1985).J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 43, 189.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. du Preez, J., Prior, B. and Monteiro, A. (1984),Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 19, 261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Delgenes, J., Moletta, R. and Navarro, J. (1986),Biotechnol. Lett. 8, 897.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. du Preez, J. and van der Walt, J. (1983),Biotechnol. Lett., 5, 357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeffries, T. (1985),Biotechnology and Bioengineering Symp. No. 15.

  13. Bruinenberg, P., de Bot, P., van Dijken, J. and Scheffers, W. (1984),Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 19, 256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jeffries, T. (1984),Biotechnol. Lett. 6, 777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Maintained in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the US Department of Agriculture of any product or service to the exclusion of others which may be suitable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alexander, M.A., Chapman, T.W. & Jeffries, T.W. Continuous xylose fermentation byCandida shehatae in a two-stage reactor. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 17, 221–229 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02779159

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02779159

Index Entries

Navigation