Audiovisual communication review

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 114–123 | Cite as

The effectiveness of an educational film without direct visual presentation of content

  • Carl H. Ketcham
  • Robert W. Heath


Single Showing Sound Track Test Film Educational Film Introductory College 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Arnspiger, Varney C.Measuring the Effectiveness of Sound Pictures as Teaching Aids. New York: Columbia University Press, 1933.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ash, Philip, and Carlton, Bruce J. “The Value of Note-Taking During Film Learning. ”British Journal of Educational Psychology 23: 121–25; June 1953.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ford, W. R, Jr. “Is Note-Taking When Viewing Motion Pictures Effective in High School Science?”Education 68: 125–27; October 1947.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gutzeit, C. L. “Teaching an Abstract Concept in Science by Means of the Motion Picture. ”Educational Screen 16: 147–48, 150-51; March 1937.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jaspen, Nathan.Effects on Training of Experimental Film Variables. Study I: Verbalization, Rate of Development, Nomenclature Errors, “How-It Works,” Repetition. Port Washington, N.Y.: Special Devices Center, 1952.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ketcham, Carl H., and Heath, Robert W. “Teaching Effectiveness of Sound with Pictures That Do Not Embody the Material Being Taught. ”AV Communication Review 10: 89–93; March-April 1962.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lumsdaine, A. A., editor.The Value of Using Multiple Examples in Training Film Instruction. Washington, D.C.: Human Resources Research Laboratories, Boiling Air Force Base, 1952.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McTavish, C. L.Effects of Repetitive Film Showings on Learning. Port Washington, N.Y.: Special Devices Center, 1950.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    May, Mark A., and others.Learning from Films. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nelson, Harold E., and Moll, Karl R.Comparisons of the Audio and Video Elements of Instructional Films. Port Washington, N.Y.: Special Devices Center, 1952.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Radlow, Robert. “The Relation of Some Measures of Ability to Measures of Learning from Sound Motion Pictures. ”AV Communication Review 4: 162–63; Spring 1956.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vernon, P. E. “An Experiment on the Value of Film and Filmstrip in Instruction of Adults. ”British Journal of Educational Psychology 16: 149–62; November 1946.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vincent, W. S.; Ash, P.; and Greenhill, L. P. “A Preliminary Report on Project No. 12: Relationship of Length and Fact Frequency to Effectiveness of Instructional Motion Pictures. ”Progress Report No. 13, Instructional Film Research Program. State College: Pennsylvania State College, 1950. pp. 14–24.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wagner, Robert Walter. “Design in the Educational Film. ”AV Communication Review 4: 167; Spring 1956.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 1963

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carl H. Ketcham
  • Robert W. Heath

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations