Skip to main content
Log in

The effectiveness of an educational film without direct visual presentation of content

  • Articles
  • Published:
Audiovisual communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Arnspiger, Varney C.Measuring the Effectiveness of Sound Pictures as Teaching Aids. New York: Columbia University Press, 1933.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Ash, Philip, and Carlton, Bruce J. “The Value of Note-Taking During Film Learning. ”British Journal of Educational Psychology 23: 121–25; June 1953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ford, W. R, Jr. “Is Note-Taking When Viewing Motion Pictures Effective in High School Science?”Education 68: 125–27; October 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gutzeit, C. L. “Teaching an Abstract Concept in Science by Means of the Motion Picture. ”Educational Screen 16: 147–48, 150-51; March 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jaspen, Nathan.Effects on Training of Experimental Film Variables. Study I: Verbalization, Rate of Development, Nomenclature Errors, “How-It Works,” Repetition. Port Washington, N.Y.: Special Devices Center, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ketcham, Carl H., and Heath, Robert W. “Teaching Effectiveness of Sound with Pictures That Do Not Embody the Material Being Taught. ”AV Communication Review 10: 89–93; March-April 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lumsdaine, A. A., editor.The Value of Using Multiple Examples in Training Film Instruction. Washington, D.C.: Human Resources Research Laboratories, Boiling Air Force Base, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McTavish, C. L.Effects of Repetitive Film Showings on Learning. Port Washington, N.Y.: Special Devices Center, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  9. May, Mark A., and others.Learning from Films. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nelson, Harold E., and Moll, Karl R.Comparisons of the Audio and Video Elements of Instructional Films. Port Washington, N.Y.: Special Devices Center, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Radlow, Robert. “The Relation of Some Measures of Ability to Measures of Learning from Sound Motion Pictures. ”AV Communication Review 4: 162–63; Spring 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vernon, P. E. “An Experiment on the Value of Film and Filmstrip in Instruction of Adults. ”British Journal of Educational Psychology 16: 149–62; November 1946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vincent, W. S.; Ash, P.; and Greenhill, L. P. “A Preliminary Report on Project No. 12: Relationship of Length and Fact Frequency to Effectiveness of Instructional Motion Pictures. ”Progress Report No. 13, Instructional Film Research Program. State College: Pennsylvania State College, 1950. pp. 14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wagner, Robert Walter. “Design in the Educational Film. ”AV Communication Review 4: 167; Spring 1956.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

This report summarizes the results of a project supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, under Title VII of the National Defense Education Act. Carl H. Ketcham is associate professor of English at the University of Arizona. Robert W. Heath is with the Educational Testing Service in Princeton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ketcham, C.H., Heath, R.W. The effectiveness of an educational film without direct visual presentation of content. AVCR 11, 114–123 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769082

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769082

Keywords

Navigation