AV communication review

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 235–249 | Cite as

Exploratory studies in the effectiveness of visual illustrations

  • Francis M. Dwyer


Student Achievement Criterial Test Oral Instruction Visual Illustration Improve Student Achievement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, W. H. Audio-visual communication. In C. W. Harris (Ed.),Encyclopedia of Educational Research. New York: Macmillan, 1960. Pp. 155–187.Google Scholar
  2. Attneave, F. Some informational aspects of visual perception.Psychological Review, 1954,61, 183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Broadbent, D. E.Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon, 1958.Google Scholar
  4. Broadbent, D. E. Information processing in the nervous system.Science, 1965,150, 457–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A.A Study of Thinking. New York: Wiley, 1956.Google Scholar
  6. Carpenter, C. R. A theoretical orientation for instructional film research.AV Communication Review, 1953,1, 38–52.Google Scholar
  7. Dale, E.Audio-visual methods in teaching. New York: Holt, 1946. Pp. 12–52.Google Scholar
  8. Dwyer, F. M. Adapting visual illustrations for effective learning.Harvard Educational Review, 1967,37, 250–263. (a)Google Scholar
  9. Dwyer, F. M. The relative effectiveness of varied visual illustrations in complementing programed instruction.The Journal of Experimental Education, 1967,36, 34–42. (b)Google Scholar
  10. Dwyer, F. M. When visuals are not the message.Educational Broadcasting Review, 1968,2, 38–43. (a)Google Scholar
  11. Dwyer, F. M. Effect of visual stimuli on varied learning objectives.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1968,27, 1067–1070. (b)Google Scholar
  12. Dwyer, F. M. An experiment in visual learning at the eleventhgrade level.The Journal of Experimental Education, 1968,37, 1–6. (c)Google Scholar
  13. Dwyer, F. M. Effect of varying amount of realistic detail in visual illustrations designed to complement programmed instruction.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1968,27, 351–354. (d)Google Scholar
  14. Dwyer, F. M. An experiment in visual communication.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1969,6, 185–195. (a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dwyer, F. M. The effect of stimulus variability on immediate and delayed retention.Journal of Experimental Education, 1969,38, (1), 30–37. (b)Google Scholar
  16. Dwyer, F. M. An analysis of the instructional effectiveness of visual illustrations presented via television.Journal of Psychology, 1969,72, 61–64. (c)Google Scholar
  17. Dwyer, F. M. An evaluation of image size as an instructional variable on television. University Park, Pa.: University Division of Instructional Services, The Pennsylvania State University, May 1969. (d)Google Scholar
  18. Dwyer, F. M. Effect of visual stimuli in complementing televised instruction.California Journal of Educational Research, 1970,21, 43–47.Google Scholar
  19. Finn, J. D. Professionalizing the audio-visual field.AV Communication Review, 1953,1, 6–17.Google Scholar
  20. Gibson, J. J. A theory of pictorial perception.AV Communication Review, 1954,2, 2–23.Google Scholar
  21. Hoban, C. F. The usable residue of educational film research. In Carpenter, et al. (Eds.),New Teaching Aids for the American Classroom. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University, Institute for Communication Research, 1960. Pp. 95–115.Google Scholar
  22. Jacobson, H. The informational capacity of the human ear.Science, 1951,112, 143–144 (a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jacobson, H. The informational capacity of the human eye.Science, 1951,113, 292–293. (b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Livingstone, R. B. Central control of afferent activity. In H. H. Jasper, et al., (Eds.),Reticular Formation of the Brain. Boston: Little, Brown, 1958. Pp. 177–185.Google Scholar
  25. Livingstone, R. B. Central control of receptors and sensory transmission systems. In M. J. Field, H. W. Magoun, & V. E. Hall (Eds.),Handbook of physiology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkens, 1959. Pp. 741–759.Google Scholar
  26. Livingstone, R. B. An adventure shared by psychology and neurophysiology. In S. Koch (Ed.),Psychology: A Study of a Science. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962. Pp. 51–99.Google Scholar
  27. Miller, N. E. (Ed.), Graphic communication and the crisis in education.AV Communication Review, 1957, 5,1-120.Google Scholar
  28. Morris, C. W.Signs, language and behavior. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1946.Google Scholar
  29. Schramm, W. Television in the life of the child—implications for the school. In Carpenter, et al. (Eds.),New Teaching Aids for the American Classroom. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University, Institute for Communication Research, 1960, 50–70.Google Scholar
  30. Travers, R. M. W., et al.Research and theory related to audiovisual information transmission. Salt Lake City, Utah: University of Utah, Bureau of Educational Research, 1964.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francis M. Dwyer
    • 1
  1. 1.University Division of Instructional ServicesThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park

Personalised recommendations