Strength of Materials

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 84–92 | Cite as

Effect of structure and texture on the anisotropy of strength properties arising in the rolling of steel tubes

  • S. B. Nizhnik
Scientific and Technical Section


Studies are made of the laws governing changes in the structure and crystallographic texture of tubes of austenitic (12Kh18N10T) and martensitic (38Kh5MSFA, 42Kh2N5SMA) steels that affect the anisotropy of the ultimate and yield strengths of these materials. These changes take place with a directional change in the strain characteristics of the rolled tubes. Features of transformation of the main components of texture in relation to initial structure and level and direction of plastic deformation are examined for rolled thin-walled tubes of austenitic and the same tubes when also heat-treated after rolling. The anisotropy of the strength properties is substantiated from the viewpoint of the effect of the crystalline orientation of the tension axis on the rate of strain-hardening of the material. For high-strength tubes made of martensitic steels, the measure of anisotropy of ultimate strength in longitudinal and transverse tension is determined to be dependent on the volume fraction of crystallites that form the secondary texture. The volume fraction of crystallites is determined by a quantitative relation linking the strain components over the diameter and wall thickness of the tube during rolling.


Austenite Ultimate Strength Crystallographic Texture Maraging Steel Rolled Product 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    V. I. Trefilov, Yu. V. Mil'man, R. K. Ivashchenko, et al., Structure, Texture, and Mechanical Properties of Deformed Molybdenum Alloys [in Russian], Nauk. Dumka, Kiev (1983).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. S. Smirnov and V. D. Durnev, Texture Formation in Metals during Rolling [in Russian], Metallurgiya, Moscow (1971).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. A. Pazlov, Physical Principles of the Cold-Working of bcc Metals [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1978).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. J. Asaro and A. Needleman, “Texture development and strain hardening in rate dependent polycrystals”, Acta Metall,33, No. 6, 923–953 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. A. Adamesku, P. V. Gel'd, and E. A. Mityushov, Anisotropy of the Physical Properties of Metals [in Russian], Metallurgiya, Moscow (1985).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. R. Irwin and D. Washington, “Analysis of stresses and strains near the end of a crack traversing a plate”, J. Appl. Mech.,24, No. 3, 361–364 (1957).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Ya. Leonov and V. V. Panasyuk, “Growth of induced cracks in solids,” Prikl. Mekh.,5, No. 4, 391–401 (1959).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. T. Hahn and A. R. Rosenfield, “Sources of fracture toughness,” in: Am. Soc. Test. Mater. Spec. Tech. Publ. Applied Phenomena in Titanium Alloys, No. 432, 5–32 (1968).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. A. Kaminskii and S. B. Nizhnik, “Study of the laws governing changes in the plastic zone at a crack tip and characteristics of the fracture toughness of metallic materials in relation to their structure (survey)” Prikl. Mekh.,31, No. 10, 3–27 (1995).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. B. Nizhnik and S. P. Doroshenko, “Structural approach to evaluating the fracture toughness of metals with strain anisotropy,” Probl. Prochn., No. 5, 53–62 (1996).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. B. Nizhnik, “Structural sensitivity of the fracture toughness characteristic KIc”, ibid., No. 8, 17–23 (1994).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. I. Chernyak, R. P. Radchenko, S. B. Nizhnik, et al., “Effect of the strain characteristics of low-temperature thermomechanical treatment on the structure and texture of high-strength tubes”, Fiz. Khim. Obrab. Mater., No. 1, 77–81 (1976).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. B. Nizhnik, “Effect of structure on the strain-hardening of austenitic and maraging steels in a plane stress state”, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Metally, No. 1, 152–158 (1992).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. B. Nizhnik, “Stress-strain diagrams of stable and metastable two-phase steel in relation to structure and the volume contents of the phases,” Probl. Prochn., No. 3, 57–61 (1980).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Wasserman and I. Greven, Textures of Metallic Materials [Russian translation], Metallurgiya, Moscow (1969).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Honeycomb, Plastic Deformation of Metals [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1972).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. S. Kudryavtsev, R. A. Adamesku, and E. V. Chudakov, “Effect of the degree of deformation during the hot rolling of flat products of titanium alloys on the formation of texture and the anisotropy of the yield point,” Fiz. Met. Metalloved.,75, No. 5, 158–160 (1993).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    H. J. Back, “The role of prior austenite grain size on the tensile ductility and fracture toughness of 18Ni maraging steels”, Scr. Metall.,13, No. 7, 577–582 (1979).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. B. Nizhnik
    • 1
  1. 1.S. P. Timoshenko Institute of MechanicsNational Academy of Science of UkraineKiev

Personalised recommendations