, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 91–101 | Cite as

An information processing approach to a theory of instruction

  • Iva Linnell Bruning
Articles ECTJ/ERIC-IR Young Scholar Paper


This paper is a version of the sixth ECTJ/ERIC-IR Young Scholar Paper, an annual award initiated to stimulate writing by young professionals in the field of instructional technology. Preparation of the paper was supported by the ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Resources at Syracuse, NY 13210.


Learner Control Instructional System Prose Imagery Instruction Instructional Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H.Human associative memory. Washington, D.C.: Winston, 1973.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. C. Control of student mediating processes during verbal learning and instruction.Review of Educational Research, 1970,40, 349–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, R. C. Schemata directed processes in language comprehension. In A. M. Lesgold, J. W. Pellegrino, S. D. Fokkema, & R. Glaser (Eds.),Cognitive psychology and instruction. New York: Plenum Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, R. C, & Hidde, J. L. Imagery and sentence learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1971,62, 526–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkinson, R. C, & Raugh, M. R. An application of the mnemonic keyword method to the acquisition of a Russian vocabulary.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1975,1, 126–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atkinson, R. C, & Shiffrin, R. M. Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.),Advances in the psychology of learning and motivation research and theory (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  7. Ausubel, D. P. Acognitive-structure theory of school learning. In L. Siegel (Ed.),Instruction: Some contemporary viewpoints. San Francisco: Chandler, 1967.Google Scholar
  8. Baker, E. L. The technology of instructional development. In R. M. W. Travers (Ed.),Second handbook for research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973.Google Scholar
  9. Bobrow, D. G., & Norman, D. A. Some principles of memory schemata. In D. G. Bobrow & A. M. Collins (Eds.),Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science. New York: Academic Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  10. Bovy, R. C. Successful instructional methods: A cognitive information processing approach.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 1981,29, 203–217.Google Scholar
  11. Briggs, L. J. (Ed.),Instructional design. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications, 1977.Google Scholar
  12. Broadbent, D. E.Perception and communication. New York: pergammon Press, 1958.Google Scholar
  13. Broadbent, D. E., & Gregory, M. On the interaction of S-R compatibility with variables affecting reaction time.British Journal of Psychology, 1965,56, 61–67.Google Scholar
  14. Bruner, J. S.Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  15. Bruning, I. L.Effects of study strategies on outcome in recall and classification tests. Paper presented at the AERA annual meeting, New York, March 1982. (a)Google Scholar
  16. Bruning, I. L. Student use of conscious cognitive strategies in instructional situations as a function of task-type and outcome measure (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1982).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1982,43, 1984-A. (b)Google Scholar
  17. Clark, H. H., & Clark, E. V.Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics.New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1977.Google Scholar
  18. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cronbach, L. J. Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology.American Psychologist, 1975,30, 116–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E.Aptitudes and instructional methods.New York: Irvington Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  21. Dansereau, D. The development of a learning strategies curriculum. In H. F. O’Neil (Ed.),Learning strategies. New York: Academic Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  22. Dansereau, D. F., Collins, K. W., McDonald, B. A., Holley, C. D., Garland, J., Diekhoff,& G., Evans S.H. Development and evaluation of a learning strategy training program.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1971,781, 64–73.Google Scholar
  23. Flavell, J. H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new era of cognitivedevelopmental inquiry.American Psychologist, 1979,34, 906–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gagnè, R. M., & Briggs, L. J.Principles of instructional design (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1979.Google Scholar
  25. Gauvarin, E. I. The relationship of mental ability to anagram solving.Journal of Psychology, 1967,66, 227–230.Google Scholar
  26. Greeno, J. G. Psychology of learning, 1960–1980: One participant’s observations.American Psychologist, 1980,35, 713–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Horton, D. L., & Turnage, T. W.Human learning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1976.Google Scholar
  28. Kavale, K., & Schreiner, R. The reading processes of above average and average readers: A comparison of the use of reasoning strategies in responding to standardized comprehension measures.Reading Research Quarterly, 1979,15, 102–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levin, J. R., McCormick, C. B., Miller, G. E., Berry, J. K., & Pressley, M. Mnemonic versus nonmnemonic vocabulary-learning strategies for children.American Educational Research Journal, 1982,19, 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Massaro, D. W.,Experimental psychology and information processing. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1975.Google Scholar
  31. Merrill, M. D. Learner control in computer based learning.Computers and Education, 1980,4, 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Merrill, M. D. Component display theory. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, in press.Google Scholar
  33. Merrill, M. D., Kowallis, T., & Wilson, B. G. Instructional design in transition. In F. H. Farley&N. J. Gordon (Eds.),Psychology and education: The state of the union. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan, 1981.Google Scholar
  34. Merrill, M. D., Olsen, J. B., & Coldeway, N. A. Research support for the instructional strategy design profile. (Tech. Rep. No. 3.) San Diego: Courseware, Inc., 1976.Google Scholar
  35. Neisser, U.Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: Freeman, 1976.Google Scholar
  36. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A.Human problem solving. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1972.Google Scholar
  37. Norman, D. A., & Rumelhart, D. E. A system for perception and memory. In D. A. Norman (Ed.),Models of human memory. New York: Academic Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  38. Paivio, A.Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1971.Google Scholar
  39. Paivio, A.Language and knowledge of the world.Educational Researcher, 1974,3, 5–12.Google Scholar
  40. Pitchert, J. W., & Anderson, R. C. Taking different perspectives on a story,journal of Educational Psychology, 1977,69, 309–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pressley, M., Levin, J. R., & Delaney, H. D. The mnemonic keyword method.Review of Educational Research, 982,52, 61–91.Google Scholar
  42. Rasco, R. W., Tennyson, R. D., & Boutwell, R. C. Imagery instructions and drawings in learning prose,journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,67, 188–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Raugh, M. R., & Atkinson, R. C. A mnemonic method for learning a second-language vocabulary.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,67, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rigney, J. W. Learning strategies: A theoretical perspective. In H. F. O’Neil (Ed.),Learning strategies. New York: Academic Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  45. Rumelhart, D. E.Introduction to human information processing. New York: Wiley, 1977.Google Scholar
  46. Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. Analogical processes in learning. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.),Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1981.Google Scholar
  47. Rumelhart, D. E., & Ortony, A. The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. F. Montague (Eds.),Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1977.Google Scholar
  48. Salomon, G. Heuristic models for the generation of aptitude-treatment interaction hypotheses.Review of Educational Research, 1971,42, 327–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Salomon, G.Interaction of media, cognition, and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1979.Google Scholar
  50. Schneider, W., & Shiffron, R. M. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review, 1977,84, 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schustack, M. W., & Anderson, J. R. Effects of analogy to prior knowledge on memory for new information.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1979,18, 565–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sherman, J. L., & Kulhavy, R. W. Processing flexibility in connected discourse.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1980,5, 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W., Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.Psychological Review, 1977,84, 127–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Snow, R. E. Theory construction for research on teaching. In R. M. W. Travers (Ed.),Second handbook for research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973.Google Scholar
  55. Steffenson, M. S., Joag-Dev, C, & Anderson, R. C. A cross-cultural perspective on reading comprehension.Reading Research Quarterly, 1979,15, 10–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Steingart, S. K., & Glock, M. D. Imagery and the recall of connected discourse.Reading Research Quarterly, 1979,15, 66–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sternberg, R. J. The nature of mental abilities.American Psychologist, 1979,34, 214–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sternberg, R. J., Ketron, J. L., & Powell, J. S. Componential approaches to the training of intelligent performance. (Tech. Rep. No. 22.) Office of Naval Research, April, 1980. (NTIS No. NR 150–412)Google Scholar
  59. Tobias, S.Achievement treatment interactions.Review of Educational Research, 1976,46,161–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Treisman, A. M. Shifting attention between the ears.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,23, 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Waugh, N. C, & Norman, D. A. The measure of interference in primary memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1968,7, 617–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Weinstein, C. E. Elaboration skills as a learning strategy. In H. F. O’Neill (Ed.),Learning strategies. New York: Academic Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  63. Wittrock, M. C. The cognitive movement in instruction.Educational Researcher, 1979,8, 5–11.Google Scholar
  64. Wittrock, M. C, & Lumsdaine, A. A. Instructional psychology.Annual Review of Psychology, 1977,28, 417–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iva Linnell Bruning
    • 1
  1. 1.Fullerton Union High School DistrictFullerton

Personalised recommendations