, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 83–98 | Cite as

Cerebral hemisphere asymmetry: Methods, issues, and implications

  • Joseph B. Hellige
Articles ERIC/ECTJ Annual Review Paper


This is the seventh ERIC/ECTJ Annual Review Paper, preparation of which was supported by the ERIC (Educational Resources Information Center) Clearing-house on Information Resources, Syracuse University. The material in this article was prepared pursuant to a contract with the National Institute of Education, U.S. Department of Education. Contractors undertaking such projects under government sponsorship are encouraged to express freely their judgment in professional and technical matters. Points of view or opinions do not necessarily represent the official view or opinion of the NIE. - Ed.


Left Hemisphere Cerebral Hemisphere Hemispheric Asymmetry Verbal Task Dichotic Listening 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference Notes

  1. Zaidel, E.Dichotic listening and hemispheric specialization in the split brain: A case study. Paper presented at the 17th annual meeting of the Academy of Aphasia, San Diego, Calif., October 15, 1979.Google Scholar
  2. Kinsbourne, M.Developmental studies of verbal-manual time sharing. Paper presented at the 17th annual meeting of the Academy of Aphasia, San Diego, Calif., October 15, 1979.Google Scholar
  3. Gardner, H., Hamby, S., Wapner, W., Cicone, M., Michel, D., & Shapiro, B.The role of the right hemisphere in the organization of linguistic materials. Paper presented at the 17th annual meeting of the Academy of Aphasia, San Diego, Calif., October 15, 1979.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, R. E.Visual instruction and visual aptitude. Paper submitted for publication, May 1, 1979.Google Scholar


  1. Ausburn, L. J., & Ausburn, F. B. Cognitive styles: Some information and implications for instructional design.Educational Communication and Technology, 1978,26, 337–354.Google Scholar
  2. Berlin, C. I. Hemisphere asymmetry in auditory tasks. In S. Harnad, R. Doty, L. Goldstein, J. Jaynes, & G. Krauthamer (Eds.),Lateralization in the nervous system. New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  3. Berlin, C. I., & McNeil, M. R. Dichotic listening. In N. J. Lass (Ed.),Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics. New York: Academic Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  4. Broca, P. Sur la faculte du langage articule.Bulletin Societe Anthropologia, 1865,6, 493–494.Google Scholar
  5. Bryden, M. P. Evidence for sex differences in cerebral organization. In M. A. Wittig & A. C. Petersen (Eds.),Sex-related differences in cognitive functioning: Developmental issues. New York: Academic Press, 1978. (a)Google Scholar
  6. Bryden, M. P. Strategy effects in the assessment of hemispheric asymmetry. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Strategies of information processing. London: Academic Press, 1978. (b)Google Scholar
  7. Bryden, M. P., & Allard, F. Visual hemifield differences depend on typeface.Brain and Language, 1976, 3, 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caramazza, A., & Berndt, R. S. Semantic and syntactic processes in aphasia: A review of the literature.Psychological Bulletin, 1978,85, 898–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carrier, C. A., & Clark, R. E. Effects of presentation modes, explicitness, and student aptitudes on learning.Educational Communication and Technology, 1978,26, 329–336.Google Scholar
  10. Case, R. A developmentally based theory and technology of instruction.Review of Educational Research, 1978, 48, 439–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, R. L. Media, mental imagery, and learning.Educational Communication and Technology, 1978,26, 355–363.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, G. Hemisphere differences in the effects of cueing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1975,1, 366–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, G.The psychology of cognition. London: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  14. Day, J. Right-hemisphere language processing in normal right handers.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977,3, 518–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Renzi, E. Hemispheric asymmetry as evidenced by spatial disorders. In M. Kinsbourne (Ed.),Asymmetrical function of the brain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  16. Dimond, S.The double brain. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1972.Google Scholar
  17. Donchin, E., Kutas, M. & McCarthy, G. Electrocortical indides of hemispheric utilization. In S. Harnad, R. Doty, L. Goldstein, J. Jaynes, & G. Krauthamer (Eds.),Lateralization in the nervous system. New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  18. Ehrlichman, H. & Weinberger, A. Lateral eye movements and hemispheric asymmetry: A critical review.Psychological Bulletin, 1978,85, 1080–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ellis, H. D. & Shepherd, J. W. Recognition of abstract and concrete words presented in the left and right visual fields.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974, 203, 1035–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Galambos, R., Benson, P., Smith, T. S., Schulman-Galambos, C. & Osier, H. On hemispheric differences in evoked potentials to speech stimuli.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neuropsychology, 1975,39, 279–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Galin, D. & Ellis, R. R. Asymmetry in evoked potentials as an index of lateralized cognitive processes: Relation to EEG alpha asymmetry.Neuropsychologia, 1975,13, 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Galin, D. & Ornstein, R. Lateral specialization of cognitive mode: An EEG study.Psychophysiology, 1972,9, 412–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gardner H.The shattered mind. New York: Vintage Books, 1974.Google Scholar
  24. Gardner, H. What we know (and don’t know) about the two halves of the brain.Harvard Magazine, 1978,80, 24–27.Google Scholar
  25. Gazzaniga, M. S.The bisected brain. New York: Appelton-Century-Crofts, 1970.Google Scholar
  26. Gazzaniga, M. S., & Le Doux, J.The integrated mind. New York: Plenum, 1978.Google Scholar
  27. Geffen, G., Bradshaw, J. L., & Nettleton, N. C. Attention and hemispheric differences in reaction time during simultaneous audio-visual tasks.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 25, 404–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Geschwind, N. The organization of language and the brain.Science, 1970, 270, 940–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Glaser, R. Components of a psychology of instruction: Toward a science of design.Review of Educational Research, 1976,46, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Glaser, R., & Resnick, L. B. Instructional psychology. In P. Mussen & M. Rosenzweig (Eds.),Annual Review of Psychology, 1972,23, 181–276.Google Scholar
  31. Glass, A. L., Holyoak, K. S. & Santa, J. L.Cognition. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1979.Google Scholar
  32. Gur, R. & Gur, R. Correlates of conjugate lateral eye movements in man. In S. Harnad, R. Doty, L. Goldstein, J. Jaynes, & G. Krauthamer (Eds.),Lateralization in the nervous system. New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  33. Guyer, L. B., & Friedman, M. P. Hemispheric processing and cognitive styles in learningdisabled and normal children.Child Development, 1975,46, 658–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Haber, R. N. Introduction.Information processing approaches to visual perception. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1969.Google Scholar
  35. Hannay, H. J. Real or imagined incomplete lateralization of function in females?Perception & Psychophysics, 1976, 19, 349–352.Google Scholar
  36. Hardyck, C., & Petrinovich, L. F. Left-handedness.Psychological Bulletin, 1977,84, 385–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hellige, J.B. Changes in same-different laterality patterns as a function of practice and stimulus quality.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,20, 267–273.Google Scholar
  38. Hellige, J. B. Effects of perceptual quality and visual field of probe stimulus presentation on memory search for letters.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, in press. (a)Google Scholar
  39. Hellige, J. B. Visual laterality and cerebral hemisphere specialization: Methodological and theoretical considerations. In J. B. Sidowski (Ed.),Conditioning, cognition, and methodology: Contemporary issues in experimental psychology. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, in press. (b)Google Scholar
  40. Hellige, J. B. & Cox, P. J. Effects of concurrent verbal memory on recognition of stimuli from the left and right visual fields.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976, 2, 210–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hellige, J. B., Cox, P. J., Litvac, L. Information processing in the cerebral hemispheres: Selective hemispheric activation and capacity limitations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1979,108, 251–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hellige, J. B. & Webster, R. Right hemisphere superiority for initial stages of letter processing.Neuropsychologia, 1979,17, 653–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Herron, J., Galin, D., Johnstone, J., & Omstein, R. E. Cerebral specialization, writing posture, and motor control of writing in left-handers.Science, 1979,205, 1285–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hicks, R. E. Intrahemispheric response competition between vocal and unimanual performance in normal adult human males.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1975,89, 50–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hines, D. Recognition of verbs, abstract nouns, and concrete nouns from the left and right visual half-fields.Neuropsychologia, 1976,13, 27–33.Google Scholar
  46. Johnson, O. & Kozma, A. Effects of concurrent verbal and musical tasks on a unimanual skill.Cortex, 1977,13, 11–16.Google Scholar
  47. Kimura, D. Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1961,15, 166–171.Google Scholar
  48. Kimura, D. Speech lateralization in young children as determined by an auditory test.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1963, 56, 899–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kimura, D. Left-right differences in the perception of melodies.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964,16, 355–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kimura, D. Dual functional asymmetry of the brain in visual perception.Neuropsychologia, 1966,4, 275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kimura, D. Spatial localization in left and right visual fields.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1969,23, 445–458.Google Scholar
  52. Kimura, D. The asymmetry of the human brain.Scientific American, 1973,228, 70–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kinsbourne, M. Eye and head turning indicates cerebral lateralization.Science, 1972,176, 589–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kinsbourne, M. Direction of gaze and distribution of cerebral thought processes.Neuropsychologia, 1974,12, 279–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kinsbourne M. (Ed.).Asymmetrical function of the brain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  56. Kinsbourne, M., & Cook, J. Generalized and lateralized effects of concurrent verbalization on a unimanual skill.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,23, 341–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kroll, N. E. A., & Madden, D. J. Verbal and pictorial processing by hemisphere as a function of the subject’s Scholastic Aptitude Test score. In J. Requin (Ed.),Attention and performance VII. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1978.Google Scholar
  58. Levy, J. & Reid, M. L. Variations in cerebral organization as a function of handedness, hand posture in writing, and sex.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1978,107, 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Madden, D. J., & Nebes, R. D. Visual perception and memory. In M. D. Wittrock (Ed.),The brain and psychology. New York: Academic Press, in press.Google Scholar
  60. Massaro, D. W.Experimental psychology and information processing. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1975.Google Scholar
  61. Mayes, A. & Beaumont, G. Does visual evoked potential asymmetry index cognitive activity?Neuropsychologia, 1977,15, 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McKeever, W. F. Does post-exposure directional scanning offer a sufficient explanation for lateral differences in tochistoscopic recognition?Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1974,38, 43–50.Google Scholar
  63. Milner, B. Interhemispheric differences and psychological processes.British Medical Bulletin, 1971,27, 272–277.Google Scholar
  64. Milner, B., Taylor, L. & Sperry, R. Lateralized suppression of dichotically presented digits after commissural section in man.Science, 1968,161, 184–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Molfese, D. L. Infant cerebral asymmetry. In S. J. Segalowitz & F. A. Gruber (Eds.),Language development and neurological theory. New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  66. Moscovitch M. Information processing and the cerebral hemispheres. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.),Handbook of behavioral neurobiology (Vol. 2). New York: Plenum Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  67. Moscovitch, M., Scullion, D. & Christie, D. Early versus late stages of processing and their relation to functional hemispheric asymmetries in face recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976,2, 401–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Moscovitch, M. & Smith, L. C. Differences in neural organization between individuals with inverted and noninverted handwriting postures.Science, 1979,205, 710–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Patterson, K. & Bradshaw, J. L. Differential hemispheric mediation of nonverbal visual stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1975,1, 246–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Polich, J. M. Hemispheric differences in stimulus identification.Perception & Psychophysics, 1978,24, 49–57.Google Scholar
  71. Rizzolatti, G., & Buchtel, H. A. Hemispheric superiority in reaction time to faces: A sex difference.Cortex, 1977,13, 300–305.Google Scholar
  72. Salomon, G. Heuristic models for the generation of aptitude-treatment interaction hypotheses.Review of Educational Research, 1971,42, 327–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Segalowitz, S. J., & Gruber, F. A. (Eds.).Language development and neurological theory. New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  74. Spellacy, F. & Blumstein, S. The influence of language set on ear preference in phoneme recognition.Cortex, 1970,6, 430–439.Google Scholar
  75. White, M. J. Laterality differences in perception: A review.Psychological Bulletin, 1969,72, 387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. White, M. J. Hemispheric asymmetries in tachistoscopic information processing.British Journal of Psychobgy, 1972,63, 497–508.Google Scholar
  77. Witelson, S. F. Hemispheric specialization for linguistic and nonlinguistic tactual perception using a dichotomous stimulation technique.Cortex, 1974,10, 3–17.Google Scholar
  78. Witelson, S. F. Sex and the single hemisphere: Specialization of the right hemisphere for spatial processing.Science, 1976,193, 425–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Witelson, S. F. Developmental dyslexia: Two right hemispheres and none left.Science, 1977,195, 309–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph B. Hellige
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations