Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Privacy versus disclosure in gamete donation: A clash of interest, of duties, or an exercise in responsibility?

  • News And Views
  • Controversies In Assisted Reproduction And Genetics
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Templeton A. Gamete donation and anonymity. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;98:343–350

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Daniels KR, Taylor K. Secrecy and openness in donor insemination. Politics Life Sci 1993;12:200–203

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Haimes EV: Do clinicians benefit from gamete donor anonymity? Hum Reprod 1993;9:1518–1520

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shenfield F: Genitor, genitrix and anonymity in gamete donation: Comments on secretes and the welfare of the child. Hum Reprod, 1996 (in press)

  5. Giavizzi MT, Brewaeys A, Cook R, Guerra D, Mantovani A, Golombock S: The European Study of Assisted Reproduction Families: Family functioning and child development. Hum Reprod 1996; 11:Abstract book 1

  6. Bioethique L, 29 July 1994, Nos. 94–654 and 94–654

  7. Daniels K, Lalos O: The Swedish insemination act and the availability of donors. Hum Reprod 1995;10:1871–1874

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, London, HMSO

  9. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Code of Practice, revised Dec 1995. London, HFEA (Paxton House, 30 Artillary Lane)

  10. Glover J: The Glover Report on Reproductive Technologies to the European Commission, Fourth Estate Ltd. Fertil Steril 1989

  11. Snowden R, Snowden E: The Gift of a Child, 2nd rev ed. Exeter, University of Exeter Press, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shenfield F: Filiation in assisted reproduction: Potential conflicts and legal implications. Hum Reprod 1994;7:1348–1354

    Google Scholar 

  13. Golombock S, Cook R, Bish A, Murray C: Families created by the new reproductive technologies: Quality of parenting and social and emotional development of the children. Child Dev 1995;66:285–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Klock SC, Jacob MC, Maier D: A prospective study of donor insemination recipients: Secrecy, privacy, and disclosure. Fertil Steril 1994;62:477–484

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Weil E, Cornet D, Sibony C, Mendelbaum J, Salat-Baroux J: Psychological aspects in anonymous and non-anonymous oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 1994;7:1344–1347

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Middlesex Hospital UCL Medical School, Fertility Unit, London, England

    F. Shenfield

Authors
  1. F. Shenfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shenfield, F. Privacy versus disclosure in gamete donation: A clash of interest, of duties, or an exercise in responsibility?. J Assist Reprod Genet 14, 371–373 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766140

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766140

Keywords

Search

Navigation