Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the role of cervical and intrauterine insemination techniques on the incidence of multiple pregnancy after Artificial Insemination with Donor Sperm

  • Clinical Assisted Reproduction
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: Our purpose was to investigate the role of the insemination technique used in an artificial insemination program with donor sperm (AID) in multiple pregnancy rates.

Methods: We carried out a retrospective nonrandom analysis of 300 pregnancies corresponding to 300 cycles in women from our Artificial Insemination Donor Sperm Program. All cycles were stimulated with gonadotropins. Single and multiple pregnancy cycles and intracervical and intrauterine pregnant cycles were compared.

Results: Intracervical insemination was performed in 173 cycles (58%), and intrauterine insemination in 127 (42%). Two hundred twenty-three pregnancies were single (74%), and 77 multiple (26%). In multiple pregnancy cycles, initial dose and mean total daily dose of gonadotropins, plasma estradiol levels, and number of follicles≥14 mm were significantly higher compared to those in single pregnancy cycles. Multiple pregnancy rate was significantly higher among pregnancies after intrauterine insemination (32%) than after intracervical insemination (21%).

Conclusions: The intrauterine technique of insemination in AID-stimulated cycles with gonadotropins is related to multiple pregnancy risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Fertility Society: Revised new guidelines for the use of semen-donor insemination. Fertil Steril 1988;49:211

    Google Scholar 

  2. Silva PD, Meisch J, Schauberger CW: Intrauterine insemination of cryopreserved donor semen. Fertil Steril 1989; 52:243–245

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Keel BA, Webster BW: Semen analysis data from fresh and cryopreserved donor ejaculates: Comparison of cryoprotectens cryoprotectans and pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril 1989;52:100–105

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barrat CL, Chauhan M, Cooke ID: Donor insemination—a look to the future. Fertil Steril 1990;54:375–385.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Urry RL, Middleton RG, Jones K, Poulson M, Worley R, Keye W: Artificial insemination: A comparison of pregnancy rates with intrauterine versus cervical insemination and washed sperm versus serum swim-up sperm preparations. Fertil Steril 1988;49:1036–1038

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Byrd W, Bradshaw K, Carr B, Edman C, Odom J, Ackerman G: A prospective randomized study of pregnancy rates following intrauterine and intracervical insemination using frozen donor sperm. Fertil Steril 1990;53:521–527

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Patton PE, Burry KA, Thurmond A, Novy MJ, Wolf DP: Intrauterine insemination outperforms intracervical insemination in a randomized, controlled study with frozen, donor semen. Fertil Steril 1992;57:559–564

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hurd WW, Randolph JF, Ansbacher R, Menge AC, Ohl DA, Brown AN: Comparison of intracervical, intrauterine, and intratubal techniques for donor insemination. Fertil Steril 1993;59:339–342

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Peters AJ, Hecht B, Wentz AC, Jeyendran RS: Comparison of the methods of artificial insemination on the incidence of conception in single unmarried women. Fertil Steril 1993;59:121–124

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Williams DB, Moley KH, Cholewa C, Odem RR, Willand J, Gast MJ: Does intrauterine insemination offer an advantage to cervical cap insemination in a donor insemination program? Fertil Steril 1995;63:295–298

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ripps BA, Minhas BS, Carson SA, Buster JE: Intrauterine insemination in fertile women delivers larger numbers of sperm to the peritoneal fluid than intracervical insemination. Fertil Steril 1994;61:398–400

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang CF and Gemzel C: The use of human gonadotropins for the induction of ovulation in women with polycystic ovarian disease. Fertil Steril 1980;33:479–486

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pardo M, Barri PN, Bancells J, Coroleu B, Buxaderas R, Pomerol JM, Sabater J: Spermatozoa selection in discontinuous Percoll gradients for use in artificial insemination. Fertil Steril 1988;3:505–509

    Google Scholar 

  14. Makler A: A new multiple exposure photography (MEP) method in routine sperm motility analysis and for research purposes. Fertil Steril 1980;33:160–166

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dodson W, Hughes CL, Haney AF: Multiple pregnancies conceived with intrauterine insemination during super ovulation: An evaluation of clinical characteristics and monitored parameters of conception cycles. AM J Obstet Ginecol 1988;159:382–385

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shelden R, Kemmann E, Bohrer M, Pasquale S: Multiple gestation is associated with the use of high sperm numbers in the intrauterine insemination specimen in women undergoing gonadotropin stimulation. Fertil Steril 1988;49:607–610

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Navot D, Goldstein N, Mor-Josef S, Simon A, Relou A, Birkenfeld A: Multiple pregnancies: Risk factors and prognostic variables during induction of ovulation with human menopausal gonadotropins. Hum Reprod 1991;6:1152–1155

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Balasch J, Ballescá JL, Pimentel C, Creus M, Fábregues F, Vanrell JA: Late low-dose pure follicle stimulating hormone for ovarian stimulation in intra-uterine insemination cycles. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1863–1866

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Balasch J, Tur R, Peinado A: The safety and effectiveness of stepwise and low-dose administration of follicle stimulating hormone in WHO Group II anovulatory infertile women: Evidence from a large multicenter study in Spain. J Assist Reprod Genet 1996;13:551–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tur, R., Buxaderas, C., Martínez, F. et al. Comparison of the role of cervical and intrauterine insemination techniques on the incidence of multiple pregnancy after Artificial Insemination with Donor Sperm. J Assist Reprod Genet 14, 250–253 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765825

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765825

Key Words

Navigation