International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 209–212 | Cite as

Initial experience with the modified vaginal wall sling in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence

  • A. K. Batra
  • R. Mathews
  • A. Lopresti
Original Article


From March 1995 to March 1996 24 women aged 29–73 years with stress urinary incontinence underwent a modified vaginal wall sling procedure following videourodynamic evaluation. Of these 24, 2 had stress urinary loss due to urethral hypermobility (UH), 3 had intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD) and 19 had both UH and ISD. Thirteen (54%) had preoperative urge incontinence, 13 (54%) had associated pelvic floor weakness, including cystocele, and 12 (50%) had had previous pelvic surgery and bladder neck suspension. Twenty-two patients were evaluable for a mean follow-up of 14 months (range 9–21 months). Stress urinary incontinence was resolved in all patients (100%). Of the patients with preoperative urge symptoms, 58% reported resolution but in 42% the urge symptoms remained unresolved. One new patient developed urge and occasional urge incontinence. Out of 22 patients 20 (90.9%) are totally continent; 2 (9.1%) are incontinent and both have documented detrusor instability and occasionally wear pads. The vaginal wall sling is an ideal procedure for the treatment of the various forms of stress urinary incontinence in women. In our series the early results indicate excellent patient acceptability and continence. Long-term follow-up will determine the durability of the procedure.


Incontinence Urethra Urethral sphincter Vagina 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Resnick NM, Yalla SV. Evaluation and medical management of urinary incontinence. In: Walsh PC, Retick AB, Stamey TA, Vaughan ED Jr, eds. Campbell’s Urology, 6th edn. Philadelphia, Saunders 1992:647–648Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Delancey JD. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:1713–1720PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hodgkinson CP. Relationships of the female urethra and bladder in stress urinary incontinence.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1953;65:560–575PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blaivas JG, Olsson CA. Stress incontinence: classification and surgical approach.J Urol 1988;139:727–731PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blaivas JG, Salinas J. Type III stress urinary incontinence: importance of proper diagnosis and treatment.Surg Forum 1984;35:473–475Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Raz S, Sussman EM, Erickson DB, Bregg KJ, Nitti VW. The Raz bladder neck suspension: results in 206 patiens.J Urol 1992;148:845–850PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elia G, Bergman AT. Estrogen effects on the urethra: beneficial effects in women with genuine stress urinary incontinence.Obstet Gynecol Surv 1993;48:509–517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davila GW, Osterman KV. The bladder neck support prosthesis: a nonsurgical approach to stress incontinence in adult women.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:206–211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cammu H, Van Nylen M, Derde MP, DeBruyne R, Amy JJ. Pelvic physiotherapy in genuine stress urinary incontinence.Urology 1991;38:332–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sand PK, Richardson DA, Staskin DR et al. Pelvic floor electrical stimulation in the treatment of genuine stress incontinence: a multicenter placebo-controlled trial.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Walker GT, Texter JH Jr. Success and patient satisfaction following the Stamey procedure for stress urinary incontinence.J Urol 1992;147:1521–1523PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Monga AK, Robinson D, Stanton SL. Preiurethral collagen injections for genuine stress incontinence: a 2-year follow-up.Br J Urol 1995;76:156–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Richardson TD, Kennelly MJ, Faerber GJ. Endoscopic injection of glutaraldehyde cross-linked collagen for the treatment of intrinsic sphincter deficiency in women.Urology 1995;46:378–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Webster GD, Perez LM, Khoury JM, Timmons SL. Management of type III stress urinary incontinence using artificial urinary sphincter.Urology 1992;39:449–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Blaivas JG, Jacobs BZ. Pubovaginal fascial sling for the treatment of complicated stress urinary incontinence.J Urol 1991;145:1241–1248Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bergman A, Elia G. Three surgical procedures for genuine stress incontinence: five year follow-up of a prospective randomized study.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:66–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Couillard DR, Deckard-Janatpour KA, Stone AR. The vaginal wall sling: a compressive suspension procedure for recurrent incontinence in elderly patients.Urology 1994;43:203–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nitti VW, Bregg KJ, Sussman EM, Raz S. The Raz bladder neck suspension in patients 65 years old and older.J Urol 1993;149:802–807PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pidutti RW, George SW, Morales A. Correction of recurrent stress urinary incontinence by needle urethropexy with a vaginal wall sling.Br J Urol 1994;73:418–422PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Juma S, Little NA, Raz S. Vaginal wall sling: few years later.Urology 1992;39:424–428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Benderev TV. Anchor fixation and other modifications of endoscopic bladder neck suspension.Urology 1992;40:409–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Raz S, Little N, Juma S. Female urology. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Stamey TA, Vaughan ED Jr, eds. Campbell’s Urology, 6th edn. Philadelphia, Saunders 1992:2782–2828Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. K. Batra
    • 1
  • R. Mathews
    • 2
  • A. Lopresti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of UrologySUNY Health Science CenterSyracuseUSA
  2. 2.Division of Pediatric Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological InstituteJohns Hopkins HospitalBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations